IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedfcr/y2010p1-46nv.6no.1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building scale in community impact investing through nonfinancial performance measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Colby Dailey
  • Ben Thornley

Abstract

The measurement of nonfinancial performance is becoming increasingly important in the community impact investing industry, where individuals and institutions actively deploy capital in low-income domestic markets for both financial and social returns. Quality data ensure that the creation of jobs, construction of community facilities, financing of affordable housing, and other benefits that characterize the sector are delivered cost-effectively and transparently. This paper discusses the limited practice and future direction of nonfinancial performance measurement by revisiting four key questions: ; 1. Does nonfinancial performance measurement really matter for investors? ; 2. If it does matter, is nonfinancial performance measurement even possible? ; 3. If nonfinancial performance is possible to measure, what form should it take? ; 4. How will nonfinancial performance measurement increase community impact investing? ; The paper examines the barriers to a more robust regime of nonfinancial performance measurement and posits both that innovation in the sector ought to be driven by the discrete but explicit needs and demands of investors, and that greater accountability has a special role to play in making disclosure more attractive. The report concludes that nonfinancial performance measurement directly informs the investment process and is essential to growing community impact investing because it provides latent sources of capital with market-level information on the tradeoffs between financial and social return. Although the industry is unlikely to discover the ?silver bullet? of nonfinancial performance measurement in the near future, there is reason to be hopeful: measurement strategies can ? and will ? converge through private- and public-sector innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Colby Dailey & Ben Thornley, 2010. "Building scale in community impact investing through nonfinancial performance measurement," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 01, pages 01-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2010:p:1-46:n:v.6no.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.frbsf.org/community-development/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/Community-Development-Investment-Review_Vol6-Num1-1.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben S. Bernanke, 2007. "By the numbers: Data and measurement in community economic development," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 01-07.
    2. Gordon L. Clark & Lisa A. Hagerman & Tessa Hebb, 2007. "Investment intermediaries in economic development: Linking public pension funds to urban revitalization," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 1, pages 45-65.
    3. Ellen Seidman, 2006. "Bridging the information gap between capital markets investors and CDFIs," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 36-39.
    4. Lisa A. Hagerman & Janneke Ratcliffe, 2009. "Increasing access to capital: could better measurement of social and environmental outcomes entice more institutional investment capital into underserved communities?," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 43-64.
    5. Lauren Lambie-Hanson, 2008. "Addressing the prevalence of real estate investments in the new markets tax credit program," Community Development Working Paper 2008-04, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    6. Jill Manning & Glenn Yago & Betsy Zeidman, 2007. "Hunting for data sources: how improving data can increase capital for emerging domestic markets," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 16-33.
    7. Mary Tingerthal, 2006. "Turning uncertainty into risk: why data are the key to greater investment," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 24-30.
    8. Winston Chang & Weili Chen, 2007. "Standard & Poor’s Small Business Portfolio Model introduces a potential new tool for community development loan risk analysis," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 34-43.
    9. Saurabh Narain & Joseph Schmidt, 2009. "NCIF social performance metrics:increasing the flow of investments in distressed neighborhoods through community development banking institutions," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 65-75.
    10. Antony Bugg-Levine & John Goldstein, 2009. "Impact investing: harnessing capital markets to solve problems at scale," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 30-41.
    11. Heidi A. Kaplan, 2007. "First mover: the CDFI fund’s CIIS database holds promise to create substantial data repository for community development investments," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 2, pages 51-59.
    12. James P Hawley & Andrew T Williams, 2005. "Shifting Ground: Emerging Global Corporate-Governance Standards and the Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(11), pages 1995-2013, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirsten Andersen & Rebecca Tekula, 2022. "Value, Values, and Valuation: The Marketization of Charitable Foundation Impact Investing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1033-1052, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Céline Louche & Daniel Arenas & Katinka Cranenburgh, 2012. "From Preaching to Investing: Attitudes of Religious Organisations Towards Responsible Investment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 301-320, October.
    2. Taylor R Gray, 2011. "Channels of Convergence: Investor Engagement and Interlocked Directorates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(9), pages 2202-2216, September.
    3. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    4. Thierry Theurillat & Jose Corpataux & Olivier Crevoisier, 2008. "Property Sector Financialization: The Case of Swiss Pension Funds (1992--2005)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 189-212, December.
    5. Clarkin John E. & L. Cangioni Carole, 2016. "Impact Investing: A Primer and Review of the Literature," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 135-173, April.
    6. Kevin Leichner, 2010. "Enhancing New Markets Tax Credit pipeline flow: Maintaining a continuous deal flow in spite of funding gaps and market volatility," Community Development Working Paper 2010-06, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    7. Bridget M Horel & Kevin McKague, 2018. "Community Contribution Companies and Access to Social Finance," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 126-126, September.
    8. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
    9. Ivan Stepanets & Leila Shafiieva, 2021. "Development of conceptual provisions for investment support of balanced socio-economic development of the region," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(4(60)), pages 52-56.
    10. Shermain Hardesty & Gail Feenstra & David Visher & Tracy Lerman & Dawn Thilmany-McFadden & Allison Bauman & Tom Gillpatrick & Gretchen Nurse Rainbolt, 2014. "Values-Based Supply Chains," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(1), pages 17-27, February.
    11. Julia Sass Rubin, 2009. "Shifting ground: Can community development loan funds continue to serve the neediest borrowers?," Community Development Working Paper 2009-01, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    12. Hilary Botein & C Patrick Heidkamp, 2013. "Tax lien sales as local neoliberal governance strategy: The case of Waterbury, Connecticut," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(5), pages 488-498, August.
    13. Thierry Theurillat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2013. "The Sustainability of a Financialized Urban Megaproject: The Case of Sihlcity in Zurich," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2052-2073, November.
    14. Kai Hockerts & Lisa Hehenberger & Stefan Schaltegger & Vanina Farber, 2022. "Defining and Conceptualizing Impact Investing: Attractive Nuisance or Catalyst?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 937-950, September.
    15. Guillermo Casasnovas & Jessica Jones, 2022. "Who Has a Seat at the Table in Impact Investing? Addressing Inequality by Giving Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 951-969, September.
    16. Freedman, Matthew, 2012. "Teaching new markets old tricks: The effects of subsidized investment on low-income neighborhoods," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1000-1014.
    17. Gordon L Clark & Adam D Dixon, 2024. "Legitimacy and the extraordinary growth of ESG measures and metrics in the global investment management industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(2), pages 645-661, March.
    18. Xiangping Jia & Geoffrey Desa, 2020. "Social entrepreneurship and impact investment in rural–urban transformation: An orientation to systemic social innovation and symposium findings," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1217-1239, December.
    19. Gordon L Clark & Tessa Hebb, 2005. "Why Should They Care? The Role of Institutional Investors in the Market for Corporate Global Responsibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(11), pages 2015-2031, November.
    20. Icíar C. Jiménez-Barandalla & Carlos Velasco-Márquez, 2023. "Inversión sostenible y de impacto para la viabilidad financiera de la empresa social. El caso Liight," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 39(166), pages 67-76, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedfcr:y:2010:p:1-46:n:v.6no.1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbsfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.