IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2023i28p110-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness and legitimacy of Amicus Curiae submission before WTO judiciary organs

Author

Listed:
  • Rezana Konomi
  • Dorina Gjipali
  • Ntastin Perola

Abstract

‘Amicus curiae’ is a latin term that means a ‘friend of the court’. In essence, this term encapsulates “[a] person who is not a party to a lawsuit but who petitions the court or is requested by the court to file a brief in the action because that person has a strong interest in the subject matter’’. This presents a non-party with the opportunity to submit its views regarding the outcome of a particular dispute regarding a broad range of issues (e.g. the appraisal of the merits in light of contemporary developments, the submission of factual elements etc.). These submissions have been present also during the predecessor of the current institutionalized WTO, namely the GATT system, albeit never being considered by those panels. However, there was gradual a shift in the panels’ position regarding the engagement with amicus curiae submissions. In this regard, the first amicus curiae submission in the US - Gasoline case was rejected by the WTO panel of that case. It was only the US - Shrimp case that paved the way for amicus curiae to find their way into the WTO adjudicative system. This was followed by a great polarization regarding the legitimacy of engaging with submission of non-state actors in an inherently inter-governmental system. This paper, therefore, sustains that the amicus curiae submissions facilitate effectiveness if exercised within the constraints of legitimacy (as conceptualized within the ambit of the WTO), by framing the analysis through doctrinal discussions as well as empirical evidence that is derived from other research that is appropriately referenced.

Suggested Citation

  • Rezana Konomi & Dorina Gjipali & Ntastin Perola, 2023. "Effectiveness and legitimacy of Amicus Curiae submission before WTO judiciary organs," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 28, pages 110-120, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2023:i:28:p:110-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr28/Academicus-MMXXIII-28-110-120.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr28/Academicus-MMXXIII-28-110-120.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dukgeun Ahn, 2021. "Why Reform is Needed: WTO ‘Public Body’ Jurisprudence," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S3), pages 61-70, April.
    2. Jackson, John H, 1998. "Dispute Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 329-351, September.
    3. SMITH, JAMES McCALL, 2003. "WTO dispute settlement: the politics of procedure in Appellate Body rulings," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 65-100, March.
    4. Arta Musaraj, 2019. "Technocracy and the questionable moral philosophy of management. A Southeast Europe inside," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 19, pages 37-48, March.
    5. Donald McRae, 2004. "What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 3-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emanuel Pietrobon, 2021. "The Eagles Belt: The Unsuspected Stage of the Great Power Competition," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 24, pages 78-84, July.
    2. José Manuel Álvarez Zárate (Editor), 2016. "¿Hacia dónde va América Latina respecto al derecho económico internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 860.
    3. Arvind PANAGARIYA, 2000. "The Millennium Round And Developing Countries: Negotiating Strategies And Areas Of Benefits," G-24 Discussion Papers 1, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    4. Sjöholm, Fredrik, 2023. "The Return of Borders in the World Economy: An EU-Perspective," Working Paper Series 1469, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Keck, Alexander & Schropp, Simon, 2007. "Indisputably essential: The economics of dispute settlement institutions in trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. Johan Lindeque & Steven McGuire, 2007. "The United States and trade disputes in the World Trade Organization: Hegemony constrained or confirmed?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 725-744, September.
    7. Khan, Haider & Liu, Yibei, 2008. "Globalization and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Making a Rules-based Trading Regime Work," MPRA Paper 7613, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    8. Forere Malebakeng, 2013. "Revisiting African States Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement through Intra-Africa RTA Dispute Settlement," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 155-179, August.
    9. Arta Musaraj, 2023. "The Maastricht Treaty and the accession of the Western Balkans. Reflections at its 30th anniversary over the coherence in the EU integration processes," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 27, pages 92-102, January.
    10. Ekardt, Felix, 2012. "Sicherung sozial-ökologischer Standards durch Partizipation: Das Beispiel nichtstaatlicher Akteure im internationalen Recht," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 264, March.
    11. Julián Tole Martínez, 2014. "Solución de controversias en los TLC. Aportes del Derecho de la OMC," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, edition 1, volume 1, number 702.
    12. Arta Musaraj, 2020. "The Pandemic and Rhetoric of Organization," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 22, pages 21-29, July.
    13. Nizamettin Dogar, 2021. "A Cultural Perspective to Leadership Practices in Balkans," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 23, pages 110-136, January.
    14. Enika Abazi, 2021. "Geopolitics in the Western Balkans: linkages, leverages and gatekeepers," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 24, pages 85-108, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2023:i:28:p:110-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.