IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3ap370-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Behavior of Business Entities, Culture and Institutions: Specifics of their Interrelations in Conditions of Neo-Industrialization

Author

Listed:
  • Vitaliy Vasilievich Biryukov
  • Elena Vasilievna Romanenko

Abstract

Goal of the research is to develop an approach for a system-value study of endogenous links between the economic behavior of business entities and ethic-cultural values and institutions. Objectives are to develop an approach for a systematic and comprehensive interpretation of dynamic and endogenous relationships of behavioral, cultural-value and institutional variables; to clarify the specifics of the systemic relationships of culture and institutions; to determine the specifics of system-endogenous influence of ethic-cultural values and institutions on the economic efficiency of entrepreneurship; to study shifts in the distribution of personal incomes and contemporary problems caused by disfunctions related to culture, values and national specifics. Central hypothesis of the research deals with the assumption that it is impossible to study the systemic links in the economic behavior emerging between business entities, culture and institutions at the required level using traditional approaches, mechanisms and methods in the dramatically changing economic reality. Research methods: theoretical and methodological approach combining the methods of the interdisciplinary research theory: synergetic, complex systems, social constructivism, metaethics, multicultural modernization and structurally active methodology, as well as methods of theoretical and empirical research. The institutional basis of the empirical part of the analysis was comprised by the statistical data of many international organizations and the main findings of cross-cultural research on this topic published in scientific journals over 2001-2016. The authors developed a theoretical and methodological approach that allows a system-holistic study of the endogenous links between behavioral, cultural-value and institutional variables, combining the individualistic and holistic methodology, as well as positive and normative approaches. The article proposes an approach for systematic study of endogenous links between the efficiency of business entities’ economic activity and cultural-value variables. Using the example of the US economy, it was proved that the dis-functionality of the value-normative and institutional systems is the fundamental factor of the abnormal inequality of personal incomes and the problems caused by it. Provisions and conclusions presented in the article enable a spacious approach to the problem and a deeper theoretical understanding of the relationship between culture and institutions, the composition and functions of the main structure-forming elements of the economic system and the national model, the role of cultural-value and institutional variables in economic efficiency of business entities. The main provisions and conclusions of the paper can be used for further theoretical and empirical studies on this issue and in practice to develop strategic approaches and priorities that can increase the effectiveness of economic policy and business. Relevance of research stems from the rise of a qualitatively new wave of global changes in the national economy caused by a shift in the nature and mechanisms of economic activities of business entities, the growing role of knowledge and innovation, culture and institutions in economic development; as well as the lack of appropriate theoretical and methodological approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitaliy Vasilievich Biryukov & Elena Vasilievna Romanenko, 2017. "Economic Behavior of Business Entities, Culture and Institutions: Specifics of their Interrelations in Conditions of Neo-Industrialization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 370-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:370-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Toboso, 2013. "Methodological developments in the Old and the New Institutional Economics," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 21(1), pages 77-115.
    2. Buchanan, John & Chai, Dominic Heesang & Deakin, Simon, 2014. "Empirical analysis of legal institutions and institutional change: multiple-methods approaches and their application to corporate governance research," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Starr, Martha A., 2009. "The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 916-925, December.
    4. Hausman,Daniel M. & McPherson,Michael S., 2006. "Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521608664, December.
    5. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2007. "Social Capital as Good Culture," NBER Working Papers 13712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Dody Hapsoro & Tulus Suryanto, 2017. "Consequences of Going Concern Opinion for Financial Reports of Business Firms and Capital Markets with Auditor Reputation as a Moderation Variable - An Experimental Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 197-223.
    7. Mongin, Philippe, 2006. "A Concept Of Progress For Normative Economics," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 19-54, March.
    8. Irma Setyawati & Sugeng Suroso & Tulus Suryanto & Dini Siti Nurjannah, 2017. "Does Financial Performance of Islamic Banking is better? Panel Data Estimation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 592-606.
    9. R. M. Harstad & R. Selten, 2014. "Bounded-rationality models:tasks to become intellectually competitive," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 5.
    10. Mark Blaug, 2001. "Is Competition Such a Good Thing? Static Efficiency versus Dynamic Efficiency," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 19(1), pages 37-48, August.
    11. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2009. "Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(3), pages 1095-1131.
    12. Tony Lawson, 2013. "What is this 'school' called neoclassical economics?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(5), pages 947-983.
    13. Eleftherios Thalassinos & Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu, 2007. "A Time Series Model for the Romanian Stock Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 57-72.
    14. Pieter Keizer, 2005. "A socio-economic framework of interpretation and analysis," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 32(1/2), pages 155-173, January.
    15. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2006. "Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 23-48, Spring.
    16. Alberto Alesina & Paola Giuliano, 2015. "Culture and Institutions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 53(4), pages 898-944, December.
    17. Sen, Amartya, 2005. "Why Exactly Is Commitment Important For Rationality?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 5-14, April.
    18. Erzo F. P. Luttmer & Monica Singhal, 2011. "Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 157-179, February.
    19. Spiegler, Peter & Milberg, William, 2009. "The taming of institutions in economics: the rise and methodology of the ‘new new institutionalism’," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 289-313, December.
    20. Hausman,Daniel M. & McPherson,Michael S., 2006. "Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521846295, September.
    21. Atkinson, Anthony B., 2015. "Inequality: what can be done?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. David Smallbone & Friederike Welter, 2012. "Entrepreneurship and institutional change in transition economies: The Commonwealth of Independent States, Central and Eastern Europe and China compared," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 215-233, April.
    23. Paola Giuliano & Antonio Spilimbergo, 2014. "Growing up in a Recession," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(2), pages 787-817.
    24. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2008. "Alfred Marshall Lecture Social Capital as Good Culture," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 6(2-3), pages 295-320, 04-05.
    25. Chavance, Bernard, 2012. "John Commons's organizational theory of institutions: a discussion," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 27-47, March.
    26. I. Van Staveren., 2009. "Ethics of Efficiency," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 12.
    27. V. Klinov., 2016. "Trends in the distribution of income between labor and capital: Factors, consequences and problems of adjustment," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 7.
    28. D. Frolov., 2016. "Methodological institutionalism 2.0: From institutions to institutional configurations," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 7.
    29. Ostrom, Elinor, 2007. "Challenges and growth: the development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 239-264, December.
    30. Boyer, Pascal & Petersen, Michael Bang, 2012. "The naturalness of (many) social institutions: evolved cognition as their foundation," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    31. Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, 2007. "Moral Rules, the Moral Sentiments, and Behavior: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(3), pages 494-514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grayna Wolska & Iwona Bak & Maciej Oesterreich & Joanna Hawlena, 2020. "Institutions in the Context of Implementing the CSR Concept and Social Trust," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 131-146.
    2. Adijati Utaminingsih & Sony Heru Priyanto & John J.O.I. Ihalauw & Linda Kusuma, 2020. "Green Business Behaviour, Green Technologies, and Sustainability in SMEs," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 417-424.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Dmitrievna Burkaltseva & Oleg Valerievich Boychenko & Olga Sergeevna Sivash & Nicholas Maksimovich Mazur & Snezhana Anatolyevna Zotova & Aleksey Valeryevich Novikov, 2017. "The Construction of the Digital Organizational, Social and Economic Production Mechanism in the Agro-industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 350-365.
    2. Francesco Giavazzi & Ivan Petkov & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2019. "Culture: persistence and evolution," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 117-154, June.
    3. Anna Maria Koukal, 2017. "How Vatican II influenced female enfranchisement: A story of rapid cultural change," CREMA Working Paper Series 2017-07, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    4. Xu, Xu & Jin, Xin, 2018. "The autocratic roots of social distrust," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 362-380.
    5. Alberto Alesina & Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Paola Giuliano, 2015. "Family Values And The Regulation Of Labor," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 599-630, August.
    6. Kudo, Yuya, 2017. "Why Is the Practice of Levirate Marriage Disappearing in Africa? HIV/AIDS as an Agent of Institutional Change," IDE Discussion Papers 627, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    7. Corrado Giulietti & Enrico Rettore & Sara Tonini, 2023. "The chips are down: the influence of family on children’s trust formation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 211-233, January.
    8. Ek, Andreas, 2021. "Cross-country differences in preferences for leisure," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Katrin Schmelz & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2020. "State Coercion and Control Aversion: Evidence from an Internet Study in East and West Germany," TWI Research Paper Series 117, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    10. Yann Algan & Thierry Mayer & Mathias Thoenig, 2013. "The Economic Incentives of Cultural Transmission: Spatial : Spatial Evidence from Naming Patterns across France," Working Papers 2013-25, CEPII research center.
    11. Schmelz, Katrin & Ziegelmeyer, Anthony, 2019. "State coercion and control aversion: An internet study in East and West Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203622, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Guiso, Luigi & Herrera, Helios & Morelli, Massimo, 2016. "Cultural Differences and Institutional Integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(S1), pages 97-113.
    13. Pevzner, Mikhail & Xie, Fei & Xin, Xiangang, 2015. "When firms talk, do investors listen? The role of trust in stock market reactions to corporate earnings announcements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 190-223.
    14. Firth, Michael & He, Xianjie & Rui, Oliver M. & Xiao, Tusheng, 2014. "Paragon or pariah? The consequences of being conspicuously rich in China's new economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 430-448.
    15. Filippini, Massimo & Wekhof, Tobias, 2021. "The effect of culture on energy efficient vehicle ownership," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    16. Yann Algan & Clément Malgouyres & Thierry Mayer & Mathias Thoenig, 2022. "The Economic Incentives of Cultural Transmission: Spatial Evidence from Naming Patterns Across France," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(642), pages 437-470.
    17. Scott L. Fulford & Ivan Petkov & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2020. "Does it matter where you came from? Ancestry composition and economic performance of US counties, 1850–2010," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 341-380, September.
    18. Michael Haliassos & Thomas Jansson & Yigitcan Karabulut, 2017. "Incompatible European Partners? Cultural Predispositions and Household Financial Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3780-3808, November.
    19. Chaudhary, Latika & Rubin, Jared & Iyer, Sriya & Shrivastava, Anand, 2020. "Culture and colonial legacy: Evidence from public goods games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 107-129.
    20. Yehonatan Givati, 2014. "Legal Institutions and Social Values: Theory and Evidence from Plea Bargaining Regimes," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 867-893, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic behavior; business entities; institutions; actors; culture; ethics; neo-industrialization. JEL Classification: O35; O38; О43; D01; D04; D31; D33;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:370-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.