IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviy2023i3p602-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Use of Financial Instruments – Regional Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Przemyslaw Pluskota

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to indicate how provinces in Poland support regional development with European Union money, especially with repayable instruments. The article poses the following research hypothesis – repayable financial instruments can effectively support regional development and previous experience is useful in the implementation of this support nowadays. The article first addresses the essence of EU cohesion politics and explains the essence and role of financial instruments and the type of support used in every region in Poland. A key element of the article is the calculation of the share of repayable instruments which will be used in the years 2021-2027, and indicating reason, and aims using that kind of support. Design/Methodology/Approach: A critical analysis of the literature and an observational method using argumentation to support generalized theses were used to achieve the aim. In addition, the induction and deduction method, the comparison and generalization method, and the synthesis method were used. Findings: The analysis carried out allowed the identification of the kind of support used in the Polish regions. The analysis has shown that the popularity of using repayable instruments is growing in voivodeships in Poland, although grants are popular as well. Practical Implications: Implementation of EU money is very crucial for regional development however the is a visibly increasing share of financial instruments, which have many advantages and should be introduced at a larger scale. Those politics in FI case will generate the regional financial institutions and regional support system. Originality/Value: The article presents the results of its own desk research and calculations. The issue presented has not previously been addressed in discussions published internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemyslaw Pluskota, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Use of Financial Instruments – Regional Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 602-611.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:3:p:602-611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3235/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel HavlÃ­Ä ek & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Liliana Berezkinova, 2013. "Innovation Management and Controlling in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 57-70.
    2. Becker, Sascha O. & Egger, Peter H. & von Ehrlich, Maximilian, 2012. "Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 648-668.
    3. Shakeel Ahmed & M. Ejaz Majeed & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Yannis Thalassinos, 2021. "The Impact of Bank Specific and Macro-Economic Factors on Non-Performing Loans in the Banking Sector: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. repec:ers:journl:v:xvi:y:2013:i:sisme:p:57-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Giua, Mara & Hoxhaj, Rezart & Pierucci, Eleonora, 2022. "Inclusive Europe: the impact of the EU Cohesion Policy on immigrants’ economic integration in Italy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 532-549.
    6. Michele Boldrin & Fabio Canova, 2001. "Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 16(32), pages 206-253.
    7. Pociovalisteanu Diana-Mihaela & Thalassinos Eleftherios, 2009. "The Structural Funds and the Economic and Social Cohesion Process," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 313-330, May.
    8. Scotti, Francesco & Flori, Andrea & Pammolli, Fabio, 2022. "The economic impact of structural and Cohesion Funds across sectors: Immediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Marco Di Cataldo, 2017. "The impact of EU Objective 1 funds on regional development: Evidence from the U.K. and the prospect of Brexit," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 814-839, November.
    10. Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu & Emilian M. Dobrescu, 2009. "The Role of Structural Funds in Economic and Social Cohesion Process," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 27-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prof. Dr. Ion Criveanu & Dr. Ec. Loredana Iordache, 2015. "Establishing Human Resources Strategies and Policies Correlating with Company's Objectives," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 3-10.
    2. Carlos San Juan Mesonada & Carlos Sunyer Manteiga, 2021. "European Structural Funds and Resilient and Recovery Facility Governance," EconPol Working Paper 67, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Paolo Di Caro & Ugo Fratesi, 2022. "One policy, different effects: Estimating the region‐specific impacts of EU cohesion policy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 307-330, January.
    4. Panagiotis KOUDOUMAKIS & George BOTZORIS & Angelos PROTOPAPAS, 2021. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy To The Development And Convergence Of The Regions Of The European Union," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 277-290, June.
    5. T.V. Shatkovskaya & N.G. Romanenko & Y.A. Naumenko & E.A. Parshina, 2017. "The Problem of Individualization of Legal Entities in Terms of Innovative Development of the Russian Federation and the European Union Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 162-171.
    6. Adijati Utaminingsih & Sony Heru Priyanto & John J.O.I. Ihalauw & Linda Kusuma, 2020. "Green Business Behaviour, Green Technologies, and Sustainability in SMEs," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 417-424.
    7. Grigory Viktorovich Prytkov & Natalia Yurievna Tsvetus & Artem Alexandrovich Balyakin & Andrey Sergeevich Malyshev & Sergey Borisovich Taranenko, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the Development and Use of Large Research Infrastructure," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 338-353.
    8. Evgenij Petrovich Vasilyev & Irina Vladimirovna Filimonenko & Tatyana Petrovna Likhacheva & Irina Rudolfovna Rouiga, 2017. "The Rationale for Increasing the Theoretical Understanding on the Basic Concepts of Economic Theory," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 386-407.
    9. Maximilian v. Ehrlich & Henry G. Overman, 2020. "Place-Based Policies and Spatial Disparities across European Cities," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 128-149, Summer.
    10. Huseyin Ozdeser, 2018. "Separation Process of Britain From the EU and its Impacts on Both Sides," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 14-23.
    11. Aleksey Vladimirovich Gribanov & Vladimir Vladimirovich Mitrokhin & Mariya Viktorovna Vilkova, 2017. "Innovation as the Main Factor for Sustainable Development of a Commercial Bank," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 408-416.
    12. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2018. "Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 386-423, March.
    13. Malgorzata K. Guzowska & Barbara Kryk, 2020. "Implementation of the Social Goals of the Europe 2020 Strategy by EU Member States," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 58-74.
    14. Cerqua, Augusto & Pellegrini, Guido, 2018. "Local policy effects at a time of economic crisis," MPRA Paper 85621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marco Di Cataldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2020. "Regional needs, regional targeting and regional growth: an assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 35-47, January.
    16. V.A. Slepov & V.K. Burlachkov & T.P. Danko & M.E. Kosov & I.I. Volkov & N.V. Ivolgina & V.D. Sekerin, 2017. "Model for Integrating Monetary and Fiscal Policies to Stimulate Economic Growth and Sustainable Debt Dynamics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 457-470.
    17. Hristina Blagoycheva, 2016. "Employment and the 'Working Poor' Phenomenon in the EU," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 3-18.
    18. Kilroy,Austin Francis Louis & Ganau,Roberto, 2020. "Economic Growth in European Union NUTS-3 Regions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9494, The World Bank.
    19. Monica Raileanu Szeles & Ileana Tache, 2016. "The Role of Education in Stimulating Economic Development in the Framework of Europe 2020 Strategy: Evidence from South-Eastern Europe," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 54-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Grants; repayable financial instruments; regional development.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:3:p:602-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.