IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p228-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Drivers of European Agriculture: Output, Income, and Stocks in Focus

Author

Listed:
  • Roma Rys-Jurek

Abstract

Purpose: The article attempts to analyze stock in relation with output and incomes in agricultural farms in the European Union. We answer the following questions: 1. How important are stocks in farms in relation with balance sum, agricultural area, output and income?; 2. Does the importance of stock depends on the economic size or type of production?; 3. What is the relation between stock output, income and other categories? Methodology: Research is based on the FADN (RICA) database. The scope of the research covers the years 2004-2021. The panel data models are used. Findings: The larger the farm in terms of economic size, the more agricultural area it has, the higher balance sum it manages, and the higher the production and income it generates. Stock of agricultural products increases also with these categories. Taking into account the level of stock, the geographical location of farm is important too but not a type of production. After conducting panel regression, it turns out that the level of stock in farm is influenced by: labour, utilised agricultural area, output, and to a lesser extent: income, liabilities and cash flow. Practical Implications: Farms play an important role as part of agricultural systems in the process of sustainable development. EU policy is focused on agriculture, especially on family farms. When farms generate income, they are able to perform their production functions continuously and efficiently. They become resilient to disruptions and unexpected crises occurring in the economic environment. The appropriate amount of stock helps maintain the continuity of production, it is a part of current assets dedicated for use in case of necessity. Originality/Value: Nowadays issues related to stock management in the context of production and income of the agricultural farms are of interest only to farmers. They are not the subject of discussion among scientists, journalists, politicians, social activists, employees of agricultural advisory centers or banks. Only the methodology for elaborating the life cycle inventory of agricultural products is discussed. Lack of the economic research in this area is a big research gap in the science.

Suggested Citation

  • Roma Rys-Jurek, 2024. "Key Drivers of European Agriculture: Output, Income, and Stocks in Focus," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 228-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:228-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3515/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Tabares & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Jose Alejandro Cano & Rodrigo Gómez-Montoya, 2022. "Rural Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Current and Emerging Issues from the Sustainable Livelihood Framework," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Vander Donckt, Marie & Chan, Philip & Silvestrini, Andrea, 2021. "A new global database on agriculture investment and capital stock," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Mirela Cristea & Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Constantin Ștefan Ponea & Carmen Claudia Durău, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials of Agricultural Companies—The Interplay with Company Size," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Runowski, Henryk & Zietara, Wojciech, 2011. "Future Role Of Agriculture In Multifunctional Development Of Rural Areas," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 5(01-2), pages 1-10.
    5. Brelik, Agnieszka, 2016. "Economic Activity of Farms Against Farms Countries of the European Union," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 16(31), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Pan A. Yotopoulos, 1967. "From Stock to Flow Capital Inputs for Agricultural Production Functions: A Microanalytic Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 49(2), pages 476-490.
    7. Sara Carter, 1998. "Portfolio entrepreneurship in the farm sector: indigenous growth in rural areas?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 17-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Arkadiusz Sadowski, 2023. "Use of Union Funds in Developing Agricultural Entrepreneurship between 2014 and 2020 in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Rodríguez del Valle, Adrián & Fernández-Vázquez, Esteban, 2024. "Analyzing market power of the agricultural industry in Asia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 652-669.
    3. Mohd Yasir Arafat & Imran Saleem & Amit Kumar Dwivedi & Adil Khan, 2020. "Determinants of agricultural entrepreneurship: a GEM data based study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 345-370, March.
    4. De Rosa, Marcello & McElwee, Gerard & Smith, Robert, 2019. "Farm diversification strategies in response to rural policy: a case from rural Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 291-301.
    5. Tan, Xiujie & Xiao, Ziwei & Liu, Yishuang & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Wang, Banban & Dong, Hanmin, 2022. "The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Minviel, Jean Joseph & De Witte, Kristof, 2017. "The influence of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A robust conditional nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1112-1120.
    7. Graskemper, Viktoria & Yu, Xiaohua & Feil, Jan-Henning, 2021. "Farmer typology and implications for policy design – An unsupervised machine learning approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2022. "Linking natural resources and performance of small agricultural businesses: Do entrepreneurial orientation and environmental sustainability orientation matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 713-725, August.
    9. Bohátová Zuzana & Schwarcz Pavol & Schwarczová Loreta & Bandlerová Anna & Tľčik Vojtech, 2016. "Multifunctionality – Interactions and Implications: The Case of the Podkylava Village (Western Slovakia)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 147-159, June.
    10. McGaughey, Sara L., 2007. "Hidden ties in international new venturing: The case of portfolio entrepreneurship," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 307-321, September.
    11. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. del Olmo-García, Francisco & Domínguez-Fabián, Inmaculada & Crecente-Romero, Fernando Javier & del Val-Núñez, María Teresa, 2023. "Determinant factors for the development of rural entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Kusz, Dariusz & Zając, Stanisław & Dziekan, Ryszard, 2020. "Regional Diversification of Investment Outlays and Labor Profitability in Agriculture in Poland," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(4).
    14. Heike Mayer & Yas Motoyama, 2017. "Entrepreneurship in small and medium-sized towns/communities," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1015-1016, October.
    15. Mingqian Li & Lingping Zhang & Junyan Huang & Yiyi Lu, 2024. "A Quantitative Evaluation Study on Return-to-Hometown Entrepreneurship Policies in 16 Provinces (Municipalities) and Autonomous Regions in China Under the Rural Revitalization Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-29, November.
    16. Qingmei Zeng & Bin Fan & Fuzeng Wang, 2024. "Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Coupling of Industrial Agglomeration and Carbon Emission Efficiency—Evidence from China’s Animal Husbandry Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Friederike Welter, 2011. "Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 165-184, January.
    18. Viktoria Graskemper & Xiaohua Yu & Jan‐Henning Feil, 2021. "Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 569-589, July.
    19. Verhees, Frans J.H.M. & Lans, Thomas & Verstegen, Jos A.A.M., 2011. "Entrepreneurial Proclivity, Market Orientation and Performance of Dutch Farmers and Horticultural growers," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115548, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & Verstegen, Jos A.A.M. & Lans, Thomas, 2018. "Searching for the entrepreneurs among new entrants in European Agriculture: the role of human and social capital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 19-30.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    The European Union; EU policy; FADN; family farm; income; output; stock.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:228-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.