IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p228-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Drivers of European Agriculture: Output, Income, and Stocks in Focus

Author

Listed:
  • Roma Rys-Jurek

Abstract

Purpose: The article attempts to analyze stock in relation with output and incomes in agricultural farms in the European Union. We answer the following questions: 1. How important are stocks in farms in relation with balance sum, agricultural area, output and income?; 2. Does the importance of stock depends on the economic size or type of production?; 3. What is the relation between stock output, income and other categories? Methodology: Research is based on the FADN (RICA) database. The scope of the research covers the years 2004-2021. The panel data models are used. Findings: The larger the farm in terms of economic size, the more agricultural area it has, the higher balance sum it manages, and the higher the production and income it generates. Stock of agricultural products increases also with these categories. Taking into account the level of stock, the geographical location of farm is important too but not a type of production. After conducting panel regression, it turns out that the level of stock in farm is influenced by: labour, utilised agricultural area, output, and to a lesser extent: income, liabilities and cash flow. Practical Implications: Farms play an important role as part of agricultural systems in the process of sustainable development. EU policy is focused on agriculture, especially on family farms. When farms generate income, they are able to perform their production functions continuously and efficiently. They become resilient to disruptions and unexpected crises occurring in the economic environment. The appropriate amount of stock helps maintain the continuity of production, it is a part of current assets dedicated for use in case of necessity. Originality/Value: Nowadays issues related to stock management in the context of production and income of the agricultural farms are of interest only to farmers. They are not the subject of discussion among scientists, journalists, politicians, social activists, employees of agricultural advisory centers or banks. Only the methodology for elaborating the life cycle inventory of agricultural products is discussed. Lack of the economic research in this area is a big research gap in the science.

Suggested Citation

  • Roma Rys-Jurek, 2024. "Key Drivers of European Agriculture: Output, Income, and Stocks in Focus," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 228-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:228-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3515/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vander Donckt, Marie & Chan, Philip & Silvestrini, Andrea, 2021. "A new global database on agriculture investment and capital stock," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Runowski, Henryk & Zietara, Wojciech, 2011. "Future Role Of Agriculture In Multifunctional Development Of Rural Areas," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 5(01-2), pages 1-10.
    3. Brelik, Agnieszka, 2016. "Economic Activity of Farms Against Farms Countries of the European Union," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 16(31), pages 1-6, December.
    4. Pan A. Yotopoulos, 1967. "From Stock to Flow Capital Inputs for Agricultural Production Functions: A Microanalytic Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 49(2), pages 476-490.
    5. Sara Carter, 1998. "Portfolio entrepreneurship in the farm sector: indigenous growth in rural areas?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 17-32, January.
    6. Mirela Cristea & Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Constantin Ștefan Ponea & Carmen Claudia Durău, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials of Agricultural Companies—The Interplay with Company Size," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Alexander Tabares & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Jose Alejandro Cano & Rodrigo Gómez-Montoya, 2022. "Rural Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Current and Emerging Issues from the Sustainable Livelihood Framework," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Xiujie & Xiao, Ziwei & Liu, Yishuang & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Wang, Banban & Dong, Hanmin, 2022. "The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Minviel, Jean Joseph & De Witte, Kristof, 2017. "The influence of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A robust conditional nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1112-1120.
    3. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2022. "Linking natural resources and performance of small agricultural businesses: Do entrepreneurial orientation and environmental sustainability orientation matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 713-725, August.
    4. Bohátová Zuzana & Schwarcz Pavol & Schwarczová Loreta & Bandlerová Anna & Tľčik Vojtech, 2016. "Multifunctionality – Interactions and Implications: The Case of the Podkylava Village (Western Slovakia)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 147-159, June.
    5. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Marta Wiacek, 2025. "The Leader in ESG Change Management: The Transformation of the Chief Financial Officer’s Role in Organization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 372-382.
    7. Kusz, Dariusz & Zając, Stanisław & Dziekan, Ryszard, 2020. "Regional Diversification of Investment Outlays and Labor Profitability in Agriculture in Poland," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(4).
    8. Mingqian Li & Lingping Zhang & Junyan Huang & Yiyi Lu, 2024. "A Quantitative Evaluation Study on Return-to-Hometown Entrepreneurship Policies in 16 Provinces (Municipalities) and Autonomous Regions in China Under the Rural Revitalization Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Friederike Welter, 2011. "Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 165-184, January.
    10. Viktoria Graskemper & Xiaohua Yu & Jan‐Henning Feil, 2021. "Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 569-589, July.
    11. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & Verstegen, Jos A.A.M. & Lans, Thomas, 2018. "Searching for the entrepreneurs among new entrants in European Agriculture: the role of human and social capital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 19-30.
    12. Borch, Odd Jarl & Roaldsen, Ingrid H.E., 2007. "Competitive positioning and value chain configuration in international markets for traditional food specialties," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7857, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 1985. "Estimates Of Cobb-Douglas And Translog Production Functions For Milk," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278514, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Sarah Fitz-Koch & Mattias Nordqvist & Sara Carter & Erik Hunter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 129-166, January.
    15. Yunwei Li & Qiuping Ji & Zijie Wang & Zishan Xiong & Simeng Zhan & Yiping Yang & Yu Hao, 2022. "Green energy mismatch, industrial intelligence and economics growth: theory and empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11785-11816, October.
    16. Mark Bomford, 2023. "More bytes per acre: do vertical farming’s land sparing promises stand on solid ground?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 879-895, September.
    17. Tarja Niemelä & Reija Häkkinen, 2014. "The Role of Pluriactivity for Continuity and Survival in Family Farm Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 7-43.
    18. Jensen, Harald R., 1977. "PART I. Farm Management and Production Economics, 1946-70," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337213.
    19. Stephen Morse, 2025. "Having Faith in the Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    20. Vlada Vitunskienė & Lina Lauraitienė, 2025. "Green Growth in Agriculture: Long-Term Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    The European Union; EU policy; FADN; family farm; income; output; stock.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:228-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.