IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p962-973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in Security Management within an Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Kopczewski
  • Jolanta Wojtowicz-Zygadlo
  • Slawomir Żurawski
  • Sylwester Pietrzyk

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to analyse the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizational security management, including its impact on improving protection effectiveness and identifying challenges associated with implementing these technologies. The first part of the article addresses contemporary challenges in organizational security management and the essence of AI in modern management. The second part discusses specific applications of AI, including the use of machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and image recognition algorithms that support both digital and physical security. The third part analyses the challenges associated with implementing AI. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research problem is formulated as a question: Does the application of artificial intelligence in security management contribute to a significant reduction in risk and improvement in protection efficiency? The research hypothesis assumes that the use of AI increases the effectiveness of protective actions through process automation, threat prediction, and faster response, but it also involves challenges such as personal data protection and high system complexity. The article employs theoretical methods, including literature analysis, industry reports, and international research findings. This approach provides a comprehensive view of security management topics utilizing AI. Findings: The conclusions indicate that artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize security management by offering effective predictive and analytical tools. However, its full utilization requires addressing issues related to privacy protection, decision-making transparency by algorithms, and the availability of specialists. Further research in this area is necessary for AI technologies to responsibly and sustainably support organizations in ensuring safety. Practical implications: AI technologies, such as machine learning and real-time data analysis, facilitate faster anomaly detection and provide more accurate risk assessments. This enables organizations to better prepare for cyber threats and other forms of operational risk. Simultaneously, advanced AI systems integrate with existing security tools, enhancing their effectiveness without requiring a complete overhaul of technological infrastructure. Originality/value: Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize security management in organizations by offering more efficient, scalable, and precise solutions. However, its full utilization requires not only appropriate technological implementation but also an understanding of emerging threats and the development of suitable risk management strategies. Further research and investment in this area are crucial to ensure that AI development strengthens security in a sustainable and responsible manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Kopczewski & Jolanta Wojtowicz-Zygadlo & Slawomir Żurawski & Sylwester Pietrzyk, 2024. "Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in Security Management within an Organization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 962-973.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:962-973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3760/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Bankins & Paul Formosa, 2023. "The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 725-740, July.
    2. Aneta Chrzaszcz & Marek Ciekanowski & Slawomir Zurawski & Wieslawa Zaloga & Sylwester Pietrzyk, 2024. "Managing Organizational Security in the Context of Global Challenges," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 765-777.
    3. Julia Nowicka & Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Janis Kudins & Pawel J. Dabrowski, 2024. "Managing Organizational Security in the Era of Digital Transformation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-471.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olimpia Ban & Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Gabriel Cristian Sabou & Betty Cohen Tzedec, 2024. "AI between Threat and Benefactor for the Competences of the Human Working Force," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 762-762, August.
    2. Li, Yunjian & Song, Yixiao & Sun, Yanming & Zeng, Mingzhuo, 2024. "When do employees learn from artificial intelligence? The moderating effects of perceived enjoyment and task-related complexity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Krzysztof Rejman & Slawomir Zurawski & Marzena Kacprzak & Zdzislaw Sirojc, 2025. "Personal Safety in the Management of Contemporary Organisations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 57-66.
    4. Slawomir Zurawski & Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Yury Pauliuchuk & Emil Ratter, 2025. "The Impact of Supply Chain Security Management on the Functioning of Modern Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 44-56.
    5. Martin Obschonka & Moren Levesque, 2024. "A Market for Lemons? Strategic Directions for a Vigilant Application of Artificial Intelligence in Entrepreneurship Research," Papers 2409.08890, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Security; management; artificial intelligence; organization; new technologies.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:962-973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.