IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p884-897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of Selected Aspects of Sustainable Development in the Opinion of Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Bekisz
  • Michal Kruszynski

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to present the theoretical aspects of sustainability and to diagnose the perception of sustainability in the opinion of Generation Z. Design/Methodology/Approach: The source materials used in the study can be broadly divided into two main groups: primary and secondary materials. The former primarily includes empirical research, i.e. data collected directly from respondents by means of a questionnaire and participatory observation. Key legal acts and normative documents were analyzed. In addition, the article uses data from the Central Statistical Office (Local Data Bank) on selected socio-economic indicators from 2019-2021. In the research process, the literature on the subject was analyzed, which made it possible to classify, generalize, describe and systematize the collected information. A questionnaire survey was also conducted among students aged 19 - 24 residing in Wrocław. Findings: The first part presents an analysis of the foundations of the theory of sustainable development. The second part describes the research methodology and presents the results of the research illustrating the issues discussed. The result of the analysis is the presentation of research on the perception of sustainability by Generation Z on the example of a selected city in Poland. Practical Implications: The analysis of the results of the study made it possible to formulate recommendations on the possibility of shaping sustainable development, taking into account the quality of life and well-being, as well as social equality, while limiting the depletion of natural resources and inhibiting environmental hazards. The problems of the studied area are many times complex, so the paper will analyze selected aspects of sustainable development. Originality/value: For the purpose of this article, a multifaceted, synthetic and critical analysis of the data available in the source literature was conducted. The proposed research can contribute to increasing awareness of sustainability among Generation Z

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Bekisz & Michal Kruszynski, 2024. "Perception of Selected Aspects of Sustainable Development in the Opinion of Generation Z," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 884-897.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:884-897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3824/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inese TRUSINA & Elita JERMOLAJEVA, 2021. "The scientific discourse on the concept of sustainable development," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 298-322, December.
    2. Janusz Gierszewski & Piotr Siemiątkowski & Andrzej Urbanek, 2020. "Local Security in the Idea of Sustainable Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 405-420.
    3. Nuno Quental & Júlia M. Lourenço & Fernando Nunes da Silva, 2011. "Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 15-29, January/F.
    4. Iwona Bak & Malgorzta Kurtz, 2021. "Selected Aspects of Sustainable Tourism in the European Union Countries form the Point of View of the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 114-129.
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:114-129 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Siemiątkowski & Patryk Tomaszewski & Joanna Marszałek-Kawa & Janusz Gierszewski, 2020. "The Financing of Renewable Energy Sources and the Level of Sustainable Development of Poland’s Provinces in the Area of Environmental Order," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Xiaoli Zhao & Pavel Castka & Cory Searcy, 2020. "ISO Standards: A Platform for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan, 2016. "Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 200-211.
    4. Falko Leukhardt & Simon Allen, 2013. "How environmentally focused is the German sustainability strategy? A critical discussion of the indicators used to measure sustainable development in Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 149-166, February.
    5. Emília Duľová Spišáková & Barbora Gontkovičová & Emil Spišák, 2021. "Assessment of Research and Development Financing Based on the Strategies in EU: Case of Sweden, Slovakia and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Agata Balinska & Ewa Jaska & Agnieszka Werenowska, 2023. "Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Behavior of Generation Z in the Context of Tourist Trips," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 945-959.
    7. Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Maria Jablonska-Woloszyn, 2020. "Assessment of Services Rendered by a Public Organization to the Citizen: The Perspective of Security in Peacetime," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 623-637.
    8. Rosario Adapon Turvey & Nandakumar Kanavillil & Christopher Murray & Gerardo Reyes, 2018. "Creating sustainable communities: skills and learning in Ontario’s small urban municipalities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1173-1190, June.
    9. Emilio Galdeano-Gómez & José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Juan C. Pérez-Mesa, 2012. "Sustainability dimensions of agricultural development in Almería (Spain): The experience of 50 years," ERSA conference papers ersa12p256, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Vandeventer, James Scott & Cattaneo, Claudio & Zografos, Christos, 2019. "A Degrowth Transition: Pathways for the Degrowth Niche to Replace the Capitalist-Growth Regime," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 272-286.
    11. Nuno Quental & Júlia M. Lourenço, 2012. "References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: a citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 361-381, February.
    12. Kang Tian & Yanrong Wang & Annan Chen & Jia Yao, 2023. "Exploring characterizing factors and mechanisms of citizens' water literacy to promote sustainable water use: A grounded systems analysis method," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1311-1327, June.
    13. Nicolai Abramovich & Alexandru Vasiliu, 2023. "Sustainability as fairness: A Rawlsian framework linking intergenerational equity and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) with business practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1328-1342, June.
    14. Piotr Siemiatkowski & Patryk Tomaszewski & Joanna Marszalek-Kawa & Zdzislaw Polcikiewicz, 2020. "The Assessment of the Local Security Policy Efficiency," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 217-237.
    15. Inese TRUSINA & Elita JERMOLAJEVA, 2022. "The Main Indicators Of The Economy Digital Transformation In The Context Of New Approach To Sustainability," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9, pages 255-278, December.
    16. Tom Waas & Jean Hugé & Thomas Block & Tarah Wright & Francisco Benitez-Capistros & Aviel Verbruggen, 2014. "Sustainability Assessment and Indicators: Tools in a Decision-Making Strategy for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Zeyu Wang & Yachao Xiong & Changli Zhang, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of Eco-Environmental Protection Policy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A PMC-Index Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa & Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2017. "Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 543-565, March.
    19. Tom Waas & Jean Hugé & Aviel Verbruggen & Tarah Wright, 2011. "Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Kibler, Ewald & Salmivaara, Virva & Stenholm, Pekka & Terjesen, Siri, 2018. "The evaluative legitimacy of social entrepreneurship in capitalist welfare systems," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 944-957.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable development; ecology; high school students.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:884-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.