IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p805-d1320946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Evaluation of Eco-Environmental Protection Policy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A PMC-Index Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zeyu Wang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yachao Xiong

    (School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Changli Zhang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

The eco-environmental protection policy of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) is paramount in upholding biodiversity and fostering sustainable development within the Yangtze River Basin. To assess the effectiveness of this policy, an evaluation system was established utilising text mining and the PMC-Index model. Subsequently, thirteen representative policies were evaluated, and their performance was visualised through PMC-Surface plots. The study showed that nine of the thirteen representative policies were assessed as “Excellent”, the remaining four were assessed as “Acceptable”, and no policy was assessed as either “Perfect” or “Poor”. It shows that the general design of the eco-environmental protection policy of the YREB is reasonable and scientific but still has much to improve. The performance is as follows: short- and medium-term policies are the most prevalent, while long-term planning is lacking; the issuing agency is relatively single, and the awareness and capacity of collaborative governance need to be strengthened; the regulatory scope of local policies does not focus on the YREB as a whole. Based on this, subsequent policies should be improved by focusing on policy timeliness, the policy issuing agency, and the regulation scope.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeyu Wang & Yachao Xiong & Changli Zhang, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of Eco-Environmental Protection Policy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A PMC-Index Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:805-:d:1320946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xufeng Cui & Ting Cai & Wei Deng & Rui Zheng & Yuehua Jiang & Hongjie Bao, 2022. "Indicators for Evaluating High-Quality Agricultural Development: Empirical Study from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1101-1127, December.
    2. Thomas Bernauer & Tobias Bohmelt, 2014. "Basins at Risk: Predicting International River Basin Conflict and Cooperation," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(4), pages 116-138, November.
    3. Paul Cairney & Christopher M. Weible, 2017. "The new policy sciences: combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 619-627, December.
    4. Dietmar Braun, 2008. "Lessons on the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 289-298, May.
    5. Changsheng Jin & Yuxi Liu & Zhongwu Li & Rizhao Gong & Mei Huang & Jiajun Wen, 2022. "Ecological consequences of China’s regional development strategy: evidence from water ecological footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13732-13747, December.
    6. Nuno Quental & Júlia M. Lourenço & Fernando Nunes da Silva, 2011. "Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 15-29, January/F.
    7. Dietmar Braun, 2008. "Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 227-239, May.
    8. Andy Pike & Kean Birch & Andrew Cumbers & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2009. "A Geographical Political Economy of Evolution in Economic Geography," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(2), pages 175-182, April.
    9. Michael Howlett & Jeremy Rayner, 2013. "Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 170-182.
    10. Ghura, Dhaneshwar, 1995. "Macro Policies, External Forces, and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(4), pages 759-778, July.
    11. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    12. Andy Pike & Kean Birch & Andrew Cumbers & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2009. "A Geographical Political Economy of Evolution in Economic Geography," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(2), pages 175-182, April.
    13. Bangjun Wang & Qiaoqiao Xing, 2022. "Evaluation of the Wind Power Industry Policy in China (2010–2021): A Quantitative Analysis Based on the PMC Index Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Thomas Griessen & Dietmar Braun, 2008. "The political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies in Switzerland," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 277-288, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    2. Henderson, Dylan & Roche, Neil, 2018. "From consensus to conflict in the regional policy mix for broadband deployment: examining the role of informal coordination," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184944, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    4. Wouter Jacobs & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Port Systems: The Role of Windows of Opportunity in Shaping Seaport Competition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1674-1692, July.
    5. Davide Luca, 2022. "National elections, sub-national growth: the politics of Turkey’s provincial economic dynamics under AKP rule [Shift-share designs: theory and inference]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 829-851.
    6. Michaela Trippl & Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Elena Goracinova & David A Wolfe, 2021. "Automotive regions in transition: Preparing for connected and automated vehicles," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1158-1179, August.
    7. Martina Manara & Erica Pani, 2023. "Institutional work: how lenders transform land titles into collateral in urban Tanzania," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 1213-1236.
    8. Neill Marshall & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Jane Pollard & Mike Coombes, 2019. "An evolutionary perspective on the British banking crisis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 1143-1167.
    9. Hassink, Robert & Gong, Huiwen, 2017. "Sketching the Contours of an Integrative Paradigm of Economic Geography," Papers in Innovation Studies 2017/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. Liam Keenan, 2020. "The geographies of the institutional and industrial constraints on the financialization of German brewing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1662-1680, November.
    11. Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers & Stuart Dawley & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2015. "Doing evolution in economic geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1532, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2015.
    12. Pierre-Alex Balland & Ron Boschma, 2024. "An Evolutionary Approach to Regional Development Traps in European Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2420, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2024.
    13. Robert Hassink, Huiwen Gong, Fabian Faller & Huiwen Gong, & Fabian Faller, 2016. "Can we learn anything from economic geography proper? Yes, we can!," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1622, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2016.
    14. Liu Zhi-gao & Dunford Michael, 2012. "Rejuvenating old industries in new contexts: The traditional Chinese medicine cluster in Tonghua, China," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 56(1-2), pages 185-202, October.
    15. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2019. "The behavioural foundations of urban and regional development: culture, psychology and agency," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 121-146.
    16. Manara, Martina & Pani, Erica, 2023. "Institutional work: how lenders transform land titles into collateral in urban Tanzania," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120208, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Luca, Davide, 2022. "National elections, sub-national growth: the politics of Turkey's provincial economic dynamics under AKP rule," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112682, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Sebastian Fastenrath & Boris Braun, 2018. "Lost in Transition? Directions for an Economic Geography of Urban Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Isaksen , Arne & Trippl , Michaela, 2014. "Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/17, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. repec:ehl:lserod:115939 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Arsani Alina & Stefan George, 2024. "Energy Transition and European Sub-Models. Restructuring EU Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 86-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:805-:d:1320946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.