IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p560-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming Barriers to Sustainability: Architectural and Social Challenges for Polish Micro-Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Malecka
  • Dominik Czerkawski

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the potential of micro-enterprises in the Wielkopolska Voivodeship as inclusive and sustainable workplaces for individuals with disabilities. It assesses employment strategies, workplace adaptations, and awareness of statutory regulations and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 8 (decent work) and SDG 10 (reduced inequalities). Design/Methodology/Approach: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative and qualitative data from 60 micro-enterprises, including those in the open labor market (OLM) and Sheltered Employment Workshops (SEWs). Data were collected through direct observation, document analysis, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI), with descriptive statistics to assess compliance and awareness. Findings: SEWs showed higher compliance with disability employment requirements, with 96.67% meeting the 6% employment rate, compared to 46.67% of OLM enterprises. SEWs also demonstrated greater awareness of SDGs (63.33% vs. 50% in OLM). Significant architectural and social barriers, limiting inclusion, were reported by 24.80% and 36.00% of enterprises, respectively, highlighting the need for workplace adaptations and attitude shifts. Practical Implications: The study emphasizes the need for policy initiatives to support OLM micro-enterprises in enhancing accessibility. Increased training on SDGs and incentives for compliance are recommended to foster inclusive practices. Addressing physical and social barriers is essential to create supportive environments for individuals with disabilities. Originality/Value: This study offers insights into the capacity of micro-enterprises to advance SDGs through inclusive employment, particularly highlighting SEWs' compliance strengths. Findings support further research on inclusivity in small-scale enterprises, aligning local practices with global sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Malecka & Dominik Czerkawski, 2024. "Overcoming Barriers to Sustainability: Architectural and Social Challenges for Polish Micro-Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 560-570.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:560-570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3608/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Amartya, 2001. "Development as Freedom," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192893307.
    2. Yosef Jabareen, 2008. "A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-192, April.
    3. Bill Hopwood & Mary Mellor & Geoff O'Brien, 2005. "Sustainable development: mapping different approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 38-52.
    4. Reinhard Steurer & Markus Hametner, 2013. "Objectives and Indicators in Sustainable Development Strategies: Similarities and Variances across Europe," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 224-241, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Peterson K. Ozili, 2022. "Sustainability and Sustainable Development Research around the World," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 20(3 (Fall)), pages 259-293.
    4. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    5. Chad S. Boda & Turaj Faran, 2018. "Paradigm Found? Immanent Critique to Tackle Interdisciplinarity and Normativity in Science for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Hametner, Markus & Kostetckaia, Mariia, 2020. "Frontrunners and laggards: How fast are the EU member states progressing towards the sustainable development goals?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Eleni Sinakou & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Peter Van Petegem, 2019. "Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, February.
    8. Teresa Berglund & Niklas Gericke, 2018. "Exploring the Role of the Economy in Young Adults’ Understanding of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Radu CIOBANU, 2015. "The Role Of European Regions In The Area Of Sustainable Development. A Comparative Analysis Between Romania, Poland And Bulgaria," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 80-91.
    10. Chad S. Boda & Turaj Faran & Murray Scown & Kelly Dorkenoo & Brian C. Chaffin & Maryam Nastar & Emily Boyd, 2021. "Loss and damage from climate change and implicit assumptions of sustainable development," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Ziheng Zhang & Rui Patricio & Gianluca Carella & Francesco Zurlo, 2022. "Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Tom Waas & Jean Hugé & Aviel Verbruggen & Tarah Wright, 2011. "Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Tendai Zawaira & Matthew W. Clance & Carolyn Chisadza, 2020. "Social Institutions and Gender-Biased Outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 2020101, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    14. Chen Yu, 2020. "Targeted industrial poverty alleviation in China’s Rural Areas: Evidence From Yulin Township," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 6(2), pages 78-88.
    15. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    17. Espinoza-Tenorio, Alejandro & Espejel, Ileana & Wolff, Matthias, 2015. "From adoption to implementation? An academic perspective on Sustainable Fisheries Management in a developing country," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 252-260.
    18. Erwin Van Tuijl & Leo Van den Berg, 2016. "Annual City Festivals as Tools for Sustainable Competitiveness: The World Port Days Rotterdam," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    20. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disability; SMEs; micro-enterprises; professional activation; recommendations.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:560-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.