IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiy2018i4p195-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Socioeconomic Development of Russia: Some Historical Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • A.E. Skhvediani
  • T.Y. Kudryavtseva

Abstract

The study is devoted to the analysis of the socioeconomic development of Russia in the context of changing technological paradigms. The authors determined the main theoretical characteristics of changing technological paradigms in the context of developing socioeconomic systems.They introduce characteristics of technological paradigms, identify processes that occurred during changing technological paradigms in the world's leading countries, and present the analysis of social, technological and economic development in Russia from the late 19th century until now.

Suggested Citation

  • A.E. Skhvediani & T.Y. Kudryavtseva, 2018. "The Socioeconomic Development of Russia: Some Historical Aspects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 195-207.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:4:p:195-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2018_XXI_4_16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Ivanova Danilina & Oksana Sergeevna Gaifutdinova & Nikolay Kuznetsof, 2015. "Reduction in Budgetary Expenditure on Social Services as one of the Russian Economy Stabilization Plan Direction," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 247-260.
    2. Melissa A. Schilling, 2015. "Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 668-686, June.
    3. Perez, Carlota, 1985. "Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: New perspectives for developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 441-463, March.
    4. I.P. Denisova & S.N. Rukina & K.N. Samoylova & A.S. Takmazyan, 2017. "Financial Instruments of the Socially Responsible Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 284-293.
    5. Carlota Perez, 2009. "Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 20, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    6. Olga Viktorovna Kitova & Viktoriya Mikhailovna Savinova & Ludmila Pavlovna Dyakonova & Sergey Naumovich Bruskin & Anton Andreevich Beshmelnitskiy & Tamara Petrovna Danko & Vladimir Dmitrievich Sekerin, 2017. "Information-Analytical System for Forecasting Indicators of the Social and Economic Sphere of the Russian Federation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 275-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Rytova & Svetlana Gutman & Cristina Sousa, 2021. "Regional Inclusive Development: An Assessment of Russian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Andrey Zaytsev, 2020. "Rental Income Structure in Economy as a Basis for Sustainable Agrarian Relations in the Agro-Industrial Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. S. A. Chernogorskiy & A. V. Kozlov & A. B. Teslya, 2020. "Game-theoretic modeling of decision-making on state support for the infrastructure development in the Russian Far North," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 10-18, May.
    4. Sergey Dianov & Lyudmila Koroleva & Natalia Pokrovskaia & Natalia Victorova & Andrey Zaytsev, 2022. "The Influence of Taxation on Income Inequality: Analysis of the Practice in the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. K. Kikkas & E. Chagina & I. Garbuzyuk & J. L. Mazzaccaro, 2020. "The experience of increasing labor productivity in the Arctic nations," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 69-75, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:195-207 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-06, Joint Research Centre.
    3. V.A. Slepov & V.K. Burlachkov & T.P. Danko & M.E. Kosov & I.I. Volkov & N.V. Ivolgina & V.D. Sekerin, 2017. "Model for Integrating Monetary and Fiscal Policies to Stimulate Economic Growth and Sustainable Debt Dynamics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 457-470.
    4. BEN KHALIFA, Adel, 2017. "Territoire Appropriant Et Economie De La Connaissance Basee Sur Les Tic : Une Approche Eclectique [Appropriating Territory and ICT-Based Knowledge economy: An Eclectic Approach]," MPRA Paper 77535, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Lisa Kustina & Junedi, 2017. "ASEAN Economic Community Impact on SMSs: A Regional Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 432-438.
    6. Olga Viktorovna Kitova & Viktoriya Mikhailovna Savinova & Ludmila Pavlovna Dyakonova & Sergey Naumovich Bruskin & Anton Andreevich Beshmelnitskiy & Tamara Petrovna Danko & Vladimir Dmitrievich Sekerin, 2017. "Information-Analytical System for Forecasting Indicators of the Social and Economic Sphere of the Russian Federation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 275-283.
    7. Pavel Pavlovich Vetrenko & Vitaly Anatolievich Mordovets & Elena Vasilievna Yaluner, 2017. "Development of Intellectual Capital in the Russian Economy to Ensure the Economic Security of a Corporation Under Competition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 604-618.
    8. Yury Yuryevich Rusanov & Natalia Nikolaevna Natocheeva & Tatiana Viktorovna Belyanchikova & Gulmira Sultanovna Bektenova, 2017. "Project Lending in Banking Risk Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 453-471.
    9. Risna Triandhari & Sugiharso Safuan & M. Syamsudin & Halim Alamsyah, 2017. "The Effect of Allocation of Dividend of the Regional Government-Owned Enterprises and the Empowerment Efforts on the Revenue of Regional Government: The Case of Indonesia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 244-258.
    10. V.A. Slepov & V.K. Burlachkov & T.P. Danko & M.E. Kosov & I.I. Volkov & O.A. Grishina & V.D. Sekerin, 2017. "The Country's Economic Growth Models and the Potential for Budgetary, Monetary and Private Financing of Gross Domestic Product Growth," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 488-500.
    11. Didier, Nicolas, 2024. "Turning fragments into a lens: Technological change, industrial revolutions, and labor," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Ben Caldecott, 2017. "Introduction to special issue: stranded assets and the environment," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    14. Kitagawa, Akiomi & Shibata, Akihisa, 2001. "Long gestation in an overlapping generations economy: endogenous cycles and indeterminacy of equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 99-127, February.
    15. Falch, Morten, 2021. "Surveillance capitalism – a new techno-economic paradigm?," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238019, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Dodi Permana, 2017. "Toward the Best Model of Strategy Implementation in Indonesian Islamic Banking from the Lens of Strategic Clarity," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 3-15.
    17. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "Mass-Produced Food: the Rise and Fall of the Promise of Health and Safety," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2013-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    18. Binz, Christian & Gosens, Jorrit & Hansen, Teis & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer, 2017. "Toward Technology-Sensitive Catching-Up Policies: Insights from Renewable Energy in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 418-437.
    19. A.L. Amin, 2000. "Challenges for Renewable Electricity in Dcs," Energy & Environment, , vol. 11(4), pages 511-530, July.
    20. Ekateryna. V. Astakhova & Alexey Yu. Mamychev & Sergey S. Shestopal & Anna A. Kritskaya & Ashkhen S. Aroyan, 2019. "The Legal and Economic Aspects of Teaching High Technology Trends," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(7), pages 132-132, October.
    21. Olga Evgenyevna Kachkova & Maria Aramovna Vakhrushina & Irina Dmitriyevna Demina & Taisiya Ivanovna Krishtaleva & Marina Ilyinichna Sidorova & Elena Nikolaevna Dombrovskaya & Lyudmila Vasilyevna Klepi, 2018. "Developing the Accounting Concept in the Public Sector," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 636-649.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Technological paradigm; technical and economic paradigm; economic growth; labor productivity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:4:p:195-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.