IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3-part1p20-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation of Effective Organ Procurement Rates and the Role of Legislation in Individual European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona Kiel-Puslecka
  • Mateusz Puslecki
  • Marek Dabrowski
  • Bartłomiej Janyga
  • Bartłomiej Perek
  • Agnieszka Zawiejska

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical transplantation has proven to be a lifesaving method since the last century. The shortage of donors and organs pool for transplantation is a worldwide subject of discussion and legislation. Design/Methodology/Approach: Authors did a critical review and identified actual donation models in individual European countries. Findings: Critical revision of the distribution of donation models in individual European countries were presented: no country has chosen the model of strict consent, 18 countries adopted a model of opt-out, of which 13 were based on a strict model of opposition, and five decided to use an extended opposition system. The extended consent model was adopted in 1/3 of European countries (14 countries), three European countries adopted the information solution, Bulgaria is the only country adopting a higher necessity model. Authors identified in European countries opt-in to opt-out movement trend and “hard” presumed consent paradox. Practical implications: Different models adopted in European countries and the shortage of organs for transplantation implicate some countries' transfer from opt-in to an opt-out model. It can benefit in increasing organ pool. Originality/value: The article includes the first complex and critical analysis of effective organ procurement and legislation models in European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona Kiel-Puslecka & Mateusz Puslecki & Marek Dabrowski & Bartłomiej Janyga & Bartłomiej Perek & Agnieszka Zawiejska, 2021. "Correlation of Effective Organ Procurement Rates and the Role of Legislation in Individual European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 20-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:20-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2338/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:20-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.