IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3-part1p197-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Methods of Measuring the Well-being at the Level of Local Self-government Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Pol
  • Stanislaw Czaja

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to identify both the advantages and disadvantages of conducting surveys and face-to-face interviews to measure well-being at the local government community level. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology was based on the analysis and evaluation of questionnaire surveys, which included residents' opinions on the functioning of municipalities in many basic dimensions and their institutions. The research was conducted in seven communes of Lower Silesia in Poland (Wałbrzych, Świdnica, Świebodzice, Strzegom, Jawor, Dobromierz, Mieroszów). When assessing the results obtained, information from other sources was also used, mainly collected statistics and direct knowledge of the surveyed communes. Findings: The developed statistical materials were prepared to make diagnoses necessary to develop new local development strategies for the studied communes and local communities, emphasizing the directly understood well-being of the local community. Practical Implications: During the analysis of the questionnaires, the authors of the study listed the primary types of mistakes made during surveys on prosperity and well-being at the level of local communities in Poland. Originality/Value: The conclusions from the research on survey research carried out in seven Lower Silesian municipalities allow for highlighting the crucial clues that will avoid several basic mistakes that reduce the results' cognitive and implementation value. Knowing the potential advantages and disadvantages of questionnaire surveys may protect against the deterioration of their values, which are very useful for implementing welfare (well-being) at the level of local communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Pol & Stanislaw Czaja, 2021. "The Methods of Measuring the Well-being at the Level of Local Self-government Communities," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 197-207.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:197-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2349/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amartya Sen & Joseph Stiglitz & Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 2010. "Mis-measuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03415632, HAL.
    2. Amartya Sen & Joseph Stiglitz & Jean-Paul Fitoussi, 2010. "Mis-measuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up?," Post-Print hal-03415632, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4vsqk7docb9nmophtp29pk68cr is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabish Nawab & Saqlain Raza & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Ghulam Yahya Khan & Sana Bashir, 2023. "Multidimensional poverty index across districts in Punjab, Pakistan: estimation and rationale to consolidate with SDGs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1301-1325, February.
    2. Shengyun Wang & Yaxin Zhang & Xingren Yao, 2021. "Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-23, September.
    3. chen, shuning & Managi, Shunsuke, 2024. "Tracing the Evolution of Natural Capital in Global Sustainability Metrics: The Advance of Inclusive Wealth," MPRA Paper 122597, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Nov 2024.
    4. Allin Paul, 2015. "Official Statistics on Personal Well-Being: Some Reflections on the Development and use of Subjective Well-Being Measures in the UK," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 16(3), pages 397-408, September.
    5. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra, 2022. "Measuring resilience in the food-energy-water nexus based on ethical values and trade relations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Ali Fisunoglu & Kyungkook Kang & Tad Kugler & Marina Arbetman-Rabinowitz, 2023. "Relative political capacity: A dataset to evaluate the performance of nations, 1960–2018," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 325-345, May.
    7. Barrozo, Ligia Vizeu & Serafim, Mirela Barros & Gomes, Lucas Antonio Cividanes & Uhrigshardt, Gabriela Guimarães & Martins, Nathália Ferraz Alonso & Oliveira, Thalita Ferreira de & Resende, João Franc, 2024. "Targeting the “poorest of the poor”: A multi-scale approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Messner, Wolfgang, 2023. "The contingency impact of culture on health security capacities for pandemic preparedness: A moderated Bayesian inference analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    9. Silva, Rui, 2024. "Well-being foundations of populism in Europe," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Ramaz Otinashvili & Shota Veshapidze & Gia Zoidze, 2023. "Impact Of Economic Crime On The Sustainable Development Of The State," Three Seas Economic Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    11. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao, 2023. "Does smart city implementation improve the subjective quality of life? Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Rudolf Wirawan & Janet J. McIntyre-Mills & Mphatheleni Makaulule & Patricia Vhahangwele Lethole & Enid Pitsoane & Akwasi Arko-Achemfuor & Norma R. A. Romm, 2023. "Together We Can Grow: Resourcing the Commons Through Pathways to Wellbeing," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 641-690, October.
    13. Onil Banerjee & Martin Cicowiez & Žiga Malek & Peter H. Verburg & Renato Vargas & Sean Goodwin & Kenneth J. Bagstad & Josué Ávila Murillo, 2024. "Banking on strong rural livelihoods and the sustainable use of natural capital in post-conflict Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26517-26538, October.
    14. Jose Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal & Jose Alberto Molina, 2022. "The gender gap in time allocation," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 497-497, July.
    15. Alberti, Manfredi & Asso, Pier Francesco, 2024. "Hazel Kyrk and the rise of empirical research in interwar America," SocArXiv 2uqya, Center for Open Science.
    16. Nam, Hyun-Jung & Ryu, Doojin, 2023. "FDI and human development: The role of governance, ODA, and national competitiveness," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Marek Kapera & Martyna Kobus, 2024. "The Gini and Mean Log Deviation Indices of Multivariate Inequality of Opportunity," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Arman Canatay & Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin, 2023. "Integrating “Neoliberal-Turn” and “Social-Turn” Constructs in Examining Sustainable Development and Happiness and Life Satisfaction: A Global-, Country Cluster-, and Country-Level Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-56, June.
    19. Ankur Betageri, 2022. "Quality of Life and the Experience of Context," Papers 2210.03639, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    20. Rosalia Castellano & Gabriella Bernardo & Gennaro Punzo, 2023. "Well-being in OECD countries: an assessment of technical and social efficiency using data envelopment analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(2), pages 141-176, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Measuring well-being; local society; welfare; analyze survey research.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:197-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.