IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2-part1p369-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Security: Revolution or Utopia?

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Trochowska-Sviderok

Abstract

Purpose: This article lays the foundations for the Sustainable Security Paradigm (SSP), which features national security as a holistic and synergistic complex-adaptive system that can integrate various domains of international, social, and individual activity in a long-term, sustainable fashion. The novel paradigm informs the original Sustainable Security Culture Development Cycle (SSCDC) that provides a model of transformation for organizations that wish to act sustainably in the security realm. Design/Methodology/Approach: The theoretical framework is centered around three pillars, the scientific study of the socio-ecological systems of the Anthropocene, a holistic understanding of security, and the realization of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. During research, the study adopted the pragmatic, critical world view with the grounded theory approach and employed mixed methods of research. Case studies of the global security consequences of the COVID epidemic, the paradoxes of the 2020 Polish National Security Strategy, and the military impact on environment, provided a cross-cultural and cross-contextual proof of data. Findings: Contemporary global security paradigm is unsustainable and unjust. Both in security studies theory and security policy at various levels, a shift is imperative. We need to move from a narrow understanding of security (in national security/defense terms) and replace it with a holistic and synergistic system. We also need a re-orientation of philosophical approaches, knowledge systems, principles, values, management practices, behaviors, and governance arrangements to ones that build sustainability in an increasingly interconnected, turbulent, and unpredictable world. Practical implications: The above allowed to create an operational SSCDC, designed to facilitate the transformation of security and defense organizations into institutions that continually create an environment of sustainable security and just development for all. Originality/Value: This is the first article that systemizes a comprehensive SSP, accompanied with an original and operational SSCDC.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Trochowska-Sviderok, 2021. "Sustainable Security: Revolution or Utopia?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 369-395.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2-part1:p:369-395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2132/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjeev Khagram & William Clark & Dana Firas Raad, 2003. "From the Environment and Human Security to Sustainable Security and Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 289-313.
    2. Bjørn Grinde & Ragnhild Bang Nes & Ian F. MacDonald & David Sloan Wilson, 2018. "Quality of Life in Intentional Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 625-640, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danuta Dziawgo, 2021. "Acceptance of Sustainability Concept by Polish Individual Investors," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 335-348.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:369-395 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mohammad Chehabeddine & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2020. "Securing regional development," Post-Print hal-02569328, HAL.
    3. Plomteux, Adrien, 2024. "Frugal abundance: Conceptualisation for degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Wang, Weijun & Zhao, Xueyan & Cao, Jianjun & Li, Hua & Zhang, Qin, 2020. "Barriers and requirements to climate change adaptation of mountainous rural communities in developing countries: The case of the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Diego Henríquez & Alfonso Urzúa & Wilson López-López, 2023. "Social Support as a Mediator of the Relationship between Identity Fusion and Psychological Well-Being in South—South Migrant Populations," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1113-1135, September.
    6. Haglund, Eric & May, Candace & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Ratner, Blake D., 2010. "Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: An analytical framework:," CAPRi working papers 100, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Rymn J. Parsons, 2011. "Strengthening Sovereignty: Security and Sustainability in an Era of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-36, August.
    8. Mohammad R. Chehabeddine & Mohammad R. Chehabeddine & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ—, 2020. "Securing regional development," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 430-442, March.
    9. Ossi Heino & Joanna Kalalahti, 2021. "Securing Operational Capability for Exceptional Circumstances: How Do Professional First Responders Respond to the Unexpected?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Bill Slee & Jonathan Hopkins, 2024. "Place-Based Collaborative Action as a Means of Delivering Goods and Services in Rural Areas of Developed Economies," World, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Janani Vivekananda & Janpeter Schilling & Shreya Mitra & Nisha Pandey, 2014. "On shrimp, salt and security: livelihood risks and responses in South Bangladesh and East India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1141-1161, December.
    12. Mohammed Sakib Uddin & Khaled Mahmud & Bijoy Mitra & Al-Ekram Elahee Hridoy & Syed Masiur Rahman & Md Shafiullah & Md. Shafiul Alam & Md. Ismail Hossain & Mohammad Sujauddin, 2023. "Coupling Nexus and Circular Economy to Decouple Carbon Emissions from Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2015. "Planetary Boundaries Must not be Crossed for the Survival of Humanity," MPRA Paper 83003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Dec 2015.
    14. Rami Zeedan, 2019. "The Role of Military Service in the Integration/Segregation of Muslims, Christians and Druze within Israel," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Pedcris M. Orencio & Aiko Endo & Makoto Taniguchi & Masahiko Fujii, 2016. "Using Thresholds of Severity to Threats to and the Resilience of Human Systems in Measuring Human Security," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 979-999, December.
    16. El Alaoui, Aicha & Nekrache, Hassane, 2017. "For sustainable economic growth that seeks to improve environmental quality: an empirical analysis applied to morocco, algeria, tunisia, and egypt," MPRA Paper 85121, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2018.
    17. Yan Long & Yilin Yang & Xiaohui Lei & Yu Tian & Youming Li, 2019. "Integrated Assessment Method of Emergency Plan for Sudden Water Pollution Accidents Based on Improved TOPSIS, Shannon Entropy and a Coordinated Development Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Lan Mu & Lan Fang & Yuhong Liu & Chencheng Wang, 2020. "Identifying Barriers and Enablers for Climate Change Adaptation of Farmers in Semi-Arid North-Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainable security; organizational culture; human security; holistic security; security paradigm; Anthropocene; security and defense policy.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2-part1:p:369-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.