IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i1p241-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Culture of Cooperative Enterprises in Poland: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Danuta Mierzwa

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the article was to determine the impact of organizational culture on the effectiveness of management of agricultural cooperatives. Cooperative movement is an important element, significantly influencing the development of rural areas and agriculture. Among scientists and practitioners, the condition of the Polish cooperative movement raises concerns about its future in confrontation with modern agriculture in highly developed countries. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methods used in the study include literature analysis and critique, participant observation, comparisons, case studies, induction and deduction, synthesis. The main research tool was the OCAI (Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument) questionnaire by K.S Cameron and E. Quinn, based on the competing value model. 133 entities located in various regions of Poland from various cooperative industries were deliberately selected for the study. These were dairy cooperatives, beekeeping horticulture and groups of agricultural producers. The research sample accounted for 20% of each type of cooperative. The questionnaires were addressed to these industries because they were able to adapt to the new challenges related to the transformation of the Polish economy after 1990. Practical Implications: The conducted research shows that the autocratic style of management dominates in the studied cooperatives. On the other hand, the measure of success is the development of human resources, greater involvement of members and teamwork. Meanwhile, the autocratic style of managing human capital and the lack of involvement of members in the results of these entities' activities cause these entities to drop out of the market and lack interest in this form of business. On the other hand, agricultural cooperatives in developed countries in Europe and the world successfully compete with capital companies. Originality/value: To improve the functioning of these entities and stop the downward trend, it is necessary to change the way of management and the legal and organizational modification of these entities. The creation of new styles and management models in the surveyed entities and modification of the law is the added value of the research undertaken.

Suggested Citation

  • Danuta Mierzwa, 2021. "Organizational Culture of Cooperative Enterprises in Poland: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 241-261.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:241-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/1960/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Boehlje & Jay Akridge & Dave Downey, 1995. "Restructuring agribusiness for the 21st century," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 493-500.
    2. Harris, Andrea & Stefanson, Brenda & Fulton, Murray E., 1996. "New Generation Cooperatives and Cooperative Theory," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 11, pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Brian R. & Fulton, Joan R. & Dooley, Frank J., 1999. "Hog Producer Investment In Value-Added Agribusiness: Risk And Return Implications," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21537, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Kalogeras, Nikos & van der Lans, Ivo A.C.M. & Pennings, Joost M.E. & van Dijk, Gert, 2004. "Members' Preferences For Cooperative Structures: An Experimental Conjoint Study," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20292, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Cook, Michael L. & Burress, Molly J. & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2008. "New Producer Strategies: The Emergence of Patron-Driven Entrepreneurship," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44397, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Sexton, Richard J., 1990. "The Role of Cooperatives in Increasingly Concentrated Agricultural Markets," Cooperatives: Their Importance in the Future Food and Agricultural System - FAMC 1990 Conference 265909, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    5. Henderson, Jason R. & McNamara, Kevin T., 2000. "The Location Of Food Manufacturing Plant Investments In Corn Belt Counties," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Fulton, Murray & Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2012. "The Value of a Norm: Open Membership and the Horizon Problem in Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 40(2), pages 1-18.
    7. Ewert, Joachim & Hanf, Jon H. & Schweichert, Erik, 2014. "Adaptation of South African Wine Cooperatives to Challenging Business Environments," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 42(2), pages 1-16.
    8. Salil Bhattarai & Michael C. Lyne & Sandra K. Martin, 2015. "Analysing the robustness of spice chains in Nepal from a smallholder perspective," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 88-102, April.
    9. Lyne, Michael C. & Collins, Ray, 2008. "South Africa’s new Cooperatives Act: A missed opportunity for small farmers and land reform beneficiaries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(2), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Duval, Yann & Biere, Arlo W., 1998. "Grain Producers' Attitudes To New Forms Of Supply Chain Coordination," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(2), pages 1-15.
    11. Malorgio, Giulio & Camanzi, Luca & Grazia, Cristina, 2012. "Supply chain relationships and quality certification schemes: a case study in fisheries," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2012(01), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Qiao Liang & George Hendrikse & Zuhui Huang & Xuchu Xu, 2015. "Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence From Zhejiang Province," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 198-214, April.
    13. Rogers, Richard T., 1990. "The Role of Marketing Cooperatives in Increasingly Concentrated Agricultural Markets: Reaction," Cooperatives: Their Importance in the Future Food and Agricultural System - FAMC 1990 Conference 265917, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    14. Hajderllari, Eliona & Karantininis, Kostas & Chaddad, Fabio, 2014. "Asset specificity and the emergence of New Generation Cooperatives – The case of a Danish potato starch cooperative," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182773, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Sporleder, Thomas L. & Goldsmith, Peter D., 1990. "The Risk Mitigation Aspects of Agricultural Cooperatives," Cooperatives: Their Importance in the Future Food and Agricultural System - FAMC 1990 Conference 265910, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    16. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2006. "Small-Scale Farmers in South Africa: Can Agricultural Cooperatives Facilitate Access to Input and Product Markets?," Staff Papers 13930, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Giannakas, Konstantinos & Fulton, Murray & Sesmero, Juan, 2016. "Horizon and Free-Rider Problems in Cooperative Organizations," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-21.
    18. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    19. Hagelaar, Geoffrey J.L.F. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2001. "Environmental Supply Chain Management: Using Life Cycle Assessment To Structure Supply Chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(4), pages 1-14.
    20. Jasper GRASHUIS & Michael COOK, 2018. "An Examination Of New Generation Cooperatives In The Upper Midwest: Successes, Failures, And Limitations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 623-644, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational culture; agricultural cooperative; management style; leadership.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P13 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Cooperative Enterprises
    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
    • P32 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Collectives; Communes; Agricultural Institutions
    • P12 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Enterprises
    • P18 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Energy; Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:241-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.