IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial1p833-847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polish Perceptions of the Belt Road Initiative Research among Managers in Opole Voivodeship

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Mazur-Kajta
  • Leszek Karczewski

Abstract

Purpose: The article discusses the expectations and plans of Polish managers from small, medium, and large sector enterprises in Opole Voivodeship related to the possibility of more effective cooperation with the Chinese side. Design/Methodology/Approach: A survey was carried out among Polish managers who represent small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large businesses in Opole Voivodeship to learn their perceptions of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as well as the plans and expectations that entrepreneurs have of the initiative. Findings: The main conclusions drawn involve, among others, the observation that entrepreneurs have very similar views on BRI. Insufficient information provided to the local business community on the Initiative was noted, which results in them not fully realizing what the Initiative actually is. Consequently, they do not know how they can participate in it or where they can obtain answers to questions about potential cooperation with the Chinese side. Moreover, most of the information about the Initiative that they have received so far does not come from the business or scientific community but the media. Practical Implications: The presented results are important for the European and Chinese sides. Among others, for institutions piloting individual projects operating under the auspices of OBOR, organizations operating in Opole Voivodeship, and for universities teaching in the area of economic and legal science. Originality/value: Research results can contribute to how the BRI is currently perceived by the Polish, who represent the SME and large enterprise sectors, how it impacts the practical effects of economic cooperation, and what steps should be taken make these effects acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Mazur-Kajta & Leszek Karczewski, 2020. "Polish Perceptions of the Belt Road Initiative Research among Managers in Opole Voivodeship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 833-847.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:833-847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1796/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerry Brown, 2018. "The Belt and Road: Security Dimensions," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 213-222, September.
    2. L. Kostecka-Tomaszewska & K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz, 2019. "Poland – A Gate to the EU or a Bottleneck in the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 472-492.
    3. Muhammad Khalil Khan & Imran Ali Sandano & Cornelius B. Pratt & Tahir Farid, 2018. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Global Model for an Evolving Approach to Sustainable Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanzhe Zhang & Xiao Yu & Jian Zhang & Bowen Zou, 2020. "Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Zunaira Khadim & Irem Batool & Muhammad Bilal Lodhi, 2021. "China–Pakistan Economic Corridor, Logistics Developments and Economic Growth in Pakistan," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    4. Koffi Dumor & Komlan Gbongli, 2021. "Trade impacts of the New Silk Road in Africa: Insight from Neural Networks Analysis," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 17(02), pages 13-26.
    5. Niu, Juanjuan & He, Jun & He, Yiqun, 2024. "Harnessing FinTech for sustainable mineral development with innovative financing strategies in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Hongxing Cao & Huirong Zhan & Yuan Wang & Ziyao Wei, 2021. "Sino-Bulgarian Economic Relations in the Post Pandemic World," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 177-196, July.
    7. Chunyang Pan & William X. Wei & Etayankara Muralidharan & Jia Liao & Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan, 2020. "Does China’s Outward Direct Investment Improve the Institutional Quality of the Belt and Road Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Yuan Chang & Xinguo Ming & Xianyu Zhang & Tongtong Zhou & Xiaoqiang Liao & Sijia Cao, 2021. "Servitization and Sustainable Value Creation Strategy for China’s Manufacturing Industry: A Multiple Case Study in the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-28, October.
    9. K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz & A. Konopelko, 2020. "Can the EAEU Deliver External Integration to Business?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 515-528.
    10. Chunjiao Yu & Ren Zhang & Lian An & Zhixing Yu, 2020. "Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative Intensified Bilateral Trade Links between China and the Involved Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Luiza Kostecka-Tomaszewska & Monika Krukowska, 2020. "Europe between China and the United States: Geoeconomic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 286-291.
    12. Yu Zhang & Le Su & Warren Jin & Yunan Yang, 2022. "The Impact of Globalization on Renewable Energy Development in the Countries along the Belt and Road Based on the Moderating Effect of the Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Muhammad Khalil Khan & Imran Ali Sandano & Cornelius B. Pratt & Tahir Farid, 2018. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Global Model for an Evolving Approach to Sustainable Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Luiza Kostecka-Tomaszewska & Monika Krukowska, 2021. "China's Economic Statecraft: The Role of the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 1019-1036.
    15. Xiaochang Chen & Xiaojun Liu & Wei Yu & Anran Tan & Chang Fu & Zongfu Mao, 2019. "Association between Cross-Cultural Social Adaptation and Overseas Life Satisfaction among Chinese Medical Aid Team Members (CMATMs) in Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, May.
    16. Aislu Taisarinova & Giuseppe Loprencipe & Madina Junussova, 2020. "The Evolution of the Kazakhstani Silk Road Section from a Transport into a Logistics Corridor and the Economic Sustainability of Regional Development in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Ullah, Atta & Pinglu, Chen & Ullah, Saif & Qaisar, Zahid Hussain & Qian, Ningyu, 2022. "The dynamic nexus of E-Government, and sustainable development: Moderating role of multi-dimensional regional integration index in Belt and Road partner countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Degong Ma & Chun Lei & Farid Ullah & Raza Ullah & Qadar Bakhsh Baloch, 2019. "China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative and Outward Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Qin Dang & Yu Huang & Yuan Hu & Shuai Ye & Shufang Wang, 2020. "Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    One Belt One Road Initiative; People’s Republic of China; Poland; Opole Voivodeship; international economic integration; managers' perception.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:833-847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.