IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vxiiy2024i3p51-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship of Fintech Innovation with Green Growth Sustainability Moderated by Blockchain Smart Contracts Among Small and Medium Sized Enterprise in Selangor, Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Puteri Aina Megat
  • Mursyidatul Najwa Khairudin
  • Nur Jalilah Haniffah
  • Ganesan Paramasivam

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the adoption of financial technology on the green growth and sustainability of SMEs. The root issue is that despite the increasing attention of fintech exposure in business markets, Malaysian businesses are hesitant to fully adopt this emerging technology. This study aims to bridge the gap between the potential of fintech innovations and their practical implementation by adopting two theoretical approaches: 1) Research-based view model for green growth 2) Extended version of the technology acceptance model for the fintech dimension. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research adopts a quantitative method using a cross-sectional survey design with a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. Data was collected from 247 decision-makers representing SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia, and the sampling technique uses stratified random sampling. The data were analyzed using SPSS and Smart-PLS. Findings: Fintech factors of green financing and green investment significantly influence the green growth sustainability, while cryptocurrency is not significant towards it. Interestingly, the finding on the moderator role of blockchain smart contracts does not play a role in moderating all the fintech factors toward green growth sustainability. Practical Implication: The direct relationship of green financing and green investment is driving the future innovation toward green growth sustainability, particularly for SMEs, but cryptocurrency gives a different insight on it. On the other hand, integrating blockchain smart contracts as the moderator for the fintech dimension does not allow the businesses to move toward green sustainability. It is essential for companies to provide platforms by offering knowledge and awareness about this technology. Aside from this, the study provides empirical implications for SMEs green growth sustainability using fintech platforms. Originality value: The research findings reveal that the moderating effect of blockchain smart contracts was insignificant in driving green sustainability outcomes for SMEs. This innovation did not support green growth sustainability to enhance transparency and increase the accountability into the environmental claims. It challenges the technology-centric view and emphasizes the importance of contextual factors, regulatory frameworks, and holistic sustainability strategies for SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Puteri Aina Megat & Mursyidatul Najwa Khairudin & Nur Jalilah Haniffah & Ganesan Paramasivam, 2024. "Relationship of Fintech Innovation with Green Growth Sustainability Moderated by Blockchain Smart Contracts Among Small and Medium Sized Enterprise in Selangor, Malaysia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 51-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:xii:y:2024:i:3:p:51-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijeba.com/journal/853/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brunnermeier, Markus & Abadi, Joseph, 2018. "Blockchain Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 13420, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Eleftherios Thalassinos & Naveed Khan & Shakeel Ahmed & Hassan Zada & Anjum Ihsan, 2023. "A Comparison of Competing Asset Pricing Models: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Mirza, Nawazish & Umar, Muhammad & Afzal, Ayesha & Firdousi, Saba Fazal, 2023. "The role of fintech in promoting green finance, and profitability: Evidence from the banking sector in the euro zone," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 33-40.
    4. Manaf Al-Okaily & Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Farah Shishan & Ahmed Al-Dmour & Rasha Alghazzawi & Malek Alsharairi, 2021. "Sustainable FinTech Innovation Orientation: A Moderated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Xiaoheng Zhang & Keyu Bao & Zebin Liu & Li Yang, 2022. "Digital Finance, Industrial Structure, and Total Factor Energy Efficiency: A Study on Moderated Mediation Model with Resource Dependence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Meng Li & Yifan Zhang & Ziyu Fan & Hao Chen, 2021. "Evaluation and Research on the Level of Inclusive Green Growth in Asia-Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Simone D’Alessandro & André Cieplinski & Tiziano Distefano & Kristofer Dittmer, 2020. "Feasible alternatives to green growth," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 329-335, April.
    8. Yushi Chen & Ulrich Volz, 2022. "Scaling up sustainable investment through blockchain‐based project bonds," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.
    9. Qihang Xue & Caiquan Bai & Weiwei Xiao, 2022. "Fintech and corporate green technology innovation: Impacts and mechanisms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3898-3914, December.
    10. Najahul Kamilah Aminy Sukri & Siti Nur ‘Atikah Zulkiffli & Nik Hazimah Nik Mat & Khatijah Omar & Mukhammad Kholid Mawardi & Nur Farah Zafira Zaidi, 2023. "An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Mark A Chen & Qinxi Wu & Baozhong Yang, 2019. "How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 2062-2106.
    12. Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Naoyuki Yoshino, 2020. "Sustainable Solutions for Green Financing and Investment in Renewable Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Effects of Urbanisation on Green Growth within Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Tairuddin Yusoff & Sazali A. Wahab & Ahmad S. A. Latiff & Suzana I. W. Osman & Nur F. M. Zawawi & Syed A. Fazal, 2018. "Sustainable Growth in SMEs: A Review from the Malaysian Perspective," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 1-43, August.
    15. Thomas Puschmann & Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2020. "How Green FinTech Can Alleviate the Impact of Climate Change—The Case of Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    16. Nashirah Abu Bakar & Sofian Rosbi & Kiyotaka Uzaki, 2017. "Cryptocurrency Framework Diagnostics from Islamic Finance Perspective: A New Insight of Bitcoin System Transaction," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(1), pages 19-28, November.
    17. Xu, Jie & Chen, Fu & Zhang, Weiwei & Liu, Yiting & Li, Tingting, 2023. "Analysis of the carbon emission reduction effect of Fintech and the transmission channel of green finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    18. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2020. "Sustainability in FinTechs: An Explanation through Business Model Scalability and Market Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Qianhua Liu & Ka-Ching Chan & Ranga Chimhundu, 2024. "Fintech research: systematic mapping, classification, and future directions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-33, December.
    20. Ndeye Ndiaye & Lutfi Abdul Razak & Ruslan Nagayev & Adam Ng, 2018. "Demystifying small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) performance in emerging and developing economies," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 18(4), pages 269-281, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoda M. Aboalsamh & Laith T. Khrais & Sami A. Albahussain, 2023. "Pioneering Perception of Green Fintech in Promoting Sustainable Digital Services Application within Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2023. "Is there any association between FinTech and sustainability? Evidence from bibliometric review and content analysis," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 748-762, December.
    3. Orkun Bayram & Isilay Talay & Mete Feridun, 2022. "Can Fintech Promote Sustainable Finance? Policy Lessons from the Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Arvind Ashta, 2023. "How Can Fintech Companies Get Involved in the Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Wu, Fei & Hu, Yan & Shen, Me, 2024. "The color of FinTech: FinTech and corporate green transformation in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Galeone, Graziana & Ranaldo, Simona & Fusco, Antonio, 2024. "ESG and FinTech: Are they connected?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Hugo Gaspar Hernandez-Palma & Dairo J. Novoa & Jorge Enrique Taboada à lvarez, 2024. "New Trends in Green Projects Aimed at Clean Energy: An Analysis of the Scientific Literature," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 278-286, November.
    8. Yuzhen Ma & Xinyang Wei & Gaoyun Yan & Xiaoyu He, 2023. "The Impact of Fintech Development on Air Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Manaf Al-Okaily & Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Farah Shishan & Ahmed Al-Dmour & Rasha Alghazzawi & Malek Alsharairi, 2021. "Sustainable FinTech Innovation Orientation: A Moderated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Thomas Puschmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2024. "Green fintech: Developing a research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2823-2837, July.
    11. Lv, Zhaojiang & Chen, Lan & Ali, Syed Ahtsham & Muda, Iskandar & Alromaihi, Abdullah & Boltayev, Jurabek Yusufovich, 2024. "Financial technologies, green technologies and natural resource nexus with sustainable development goals: Evidence from resource abundant economies using MMQR estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Qin, Lu & Aziz, Ghazala & Hussan, Muhammad Wasim & Qadeer, Afifa & Sarwar, Suleman, 2024. "Empirical evidence of fintech and green environment: Using the green finance as a mediating variable," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 33-49.
    13. Javier Sada Bittini & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual & Roberto Moro-Visconti, 2022. "Business Models and Sustainability Plans in the FinTech, InsurTech, and PropTech Industry: Evidence from Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Md. Sazib Miyan & Calvin W. H. Cheong & Arshian Sharif & Sahar Afshan, 2024. "Three Decades of Green Finance: The State of the Art and Way Forward," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 88-105, November.
    15. Leng, Chunyu & Wei, Siao-Yun & Al-Abyadh, Mohammed Hasan Ali & Halteh, Khaled & Bauetdinov, Majit & Le, Luan Thanh & Alzoubi, Haitham M., 2024. "An empirical assessment of the effect of natural resources and financial technologies on sustainable development in resource abundant developing countries: Evidence using MMQR estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Ghaemi Asl, Mahdi & Ben Jabeur, Sami & Hosseini, Seyedeh Sana & Tajmir Riahi, Hamed, 2024. "Fintech's impact on conventional and Islamic sustainable equities: Short- and long-term contributions of the digital financial ecosystem," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2023. "Customer Experience in Open Banking and How It Affects Loyalty Intention: A Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Xin Yun & Yang Hu, 2024. "An Overview of the Evolution in the Research Landscape of Green Finance," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Miklesh Yadav & Nandita Mishra & Shruti Ashok, 2023. "Dynamic connectedness of green bond with financial markets of European countries under OECD economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 609-631, February.
    20. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fintech; Green Growth Sustainability; Green Investment; Green Financing; Cryptocurrency; Blockchain Smart Contracts.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:xii:y:2024:i:3:p:51-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.