IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experts, Citizens, and Eurocrats Towards a Policy Shift in the Governance of Biopolitics in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Abels, Gabriele

Abstract

The hypothesis put forward in this paper is that we are currently observing a remarkable policy shift in the European Community concerning the conceptual basis and instruments for the governance of biopolitics. Biopolitics refers to an emerging policy field which involves the societal conflicts over the application of new genetic and reproductive technologies to humans (biomedicine) as well as the application of these new technologies particularly to agriculture and food production (biotechnology). The changes refer to the basic concept of how to govern the relationship between science and society, experts and lay-people, citizens and Eurocrats. The EC is opening up for incorporating ethical concerns into its research, technology and development policy as well as its regulatory biopolicies; furthermore, there is growing openness for participatory forms of biopolicy-making, yet the meaning of participation is limited. The reasons for this development are to be found in a more general trend in the transformation of European governance on the one hand aiming at involving civil society actors, and, on the other hand, in the characteristics of the policy field. These visions, spread out in the Commissions White Paper on European Governance and several related policy papers, prove to be challenging for the Union as dynamic and multi-level polity.

Suggested Citation

  • Abels, Gabriele, 2002. "Experts, Citizens, and Eurocrats Towards a Policy Shift in the Governance of Biopolitics in the EU," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 6, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-019a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-019.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2002-019.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony R Zito, 2001. "Epistemic communities, European Union governance and the public voice," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 465-476, December.
    2. Neyer, Jürgen, 2000. "The Regulation of Risks and the Power of the People: Lessons from the BSE Crisis," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 4, May.
    3. Haas, Peter M., 1992. "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-35, January.
    4. Anonymous, 1964. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 876-878, October.
    5. Vogel, David, 2001. "The new politics of risk regulation in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35984, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Les Levidow & Claire Marris, 2001. "Science and governance in Europe: Lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(5), pages 345-360, October.
    7. Giandomenico Majone, 2002. "The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 89-109, March.
    8. Anonymous, 1964. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 200-204, January.
    9. Simon Joss, 1998. "Danish consensus conferences as a model of participatory technology assessment: An impact study of consensus conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish public debate," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 2-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kröger, Sandra, 2008. "Nothing but consultation: The place of organised civil society in EU policy-making across policies," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 3, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    2. Lievrouw, Leah A., 2010. "Instructions for being unhappy with PTA — The impact on PTA of Austrian technology policy experts´ conceptualisation of the public," ITA manu:scripts 10_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    3. Abby Kinchy, 2010. "Anti-genetic engineering activism and scientized politics in the case of “contaminated” Mexican maize," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(4), pages 505-517, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Soto-Coloballes, 2020. "The Development of Air Pollution in Mexico City," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    2. Aparicio Fenoll, Ainoa & Kuehn, Zoë, 2016. "Education Policies and Migration across European Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 9755, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Friend, Reed E., 1971. "Use of Wheat for Feed in the European Economic Community, with Projections to 1975," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Andreas Faludi, 2014. "EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 155-169, June.
    5. Zolotareva Anna & Misihina Svetlana & Nazarov Vladimir & Shatalov Stanislav, 2011. "The State and the Prospects of the Social Safety Net Development in the Russia," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 156P.
    6. Krapohl, Sebastian & Zurek, Karolina, 2006. "The Perils of Committee Governance: Intergovernmental Bargaining during the BSE Scandal in the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 10, May.
    7. Kochenov, Dimitry, 2005. "EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty Custom Concubinage?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 9, April.
    8. Gregory Shaffer & Mark Pollack, 2004. "Regulating Between National Fears and Global Disciplines:Agricultural Biotechnology in the EU," Jean Monnet Working Papers 10, Jean Monnet Chair.
    9. Moshe Maor, 2017. "Policy entrepreneurs in policy valuation processes: The case of the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1401-1417, December.
    10. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    11. Andrew B. Whitford & Derrick Anderson, 2021. "Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1053-1070, October.
    12. Barry Eichengreen and Fabio Ghironi., 1997. "European Monetary Unification and International Monetary Cooperation," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C97-091, University of California at Berkeley.
    13. Jeanie Bukowski, 2017. "A “new water culture†on the Iberian Peninsula? Evaluating epistemic community impact on water resources management policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(2), pages 239-264, March.
    14. Mateos-Garcia, Juan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2008. "The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 333-344, December.
    15. Catherine Long, 2017. "Delegated Service Authority: Institutional Evolution of PEPFAR Health-Based Program Implementing Units in Tanzania," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 303-312, September.
    16. Federico Maria Ferrara & Jörg S Haas & Andrew Peterson & Thomas Sattler, 2022. "Exports vs. Investment: How Public Discourse Shapes Support for External Imbalances," Post-Print hal-02569351, HAL.
    17. Sandberg, Kristin Ingstad & Andresen, Steinar & Bjune, Gunnar, 2010. "A new approach to global health institutions? A case study of new vaccine introduction and the formation of the GAVI Alliance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1349-1356, October.
    18. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    19. Sosay, Gül & Zenginobuz, Unal, 2005. "Independent regulatory agencies in emerging economies," MPRA Paper 380, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Muriel Figuié & Tristan Fournier, 2010. "Risques sanitaires globaux et politiques nationales : la gestion de la grippe aviaire au Vietnam," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 91(3), pages 327-343.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.