IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worbus/v59y2024i5s1090951624000464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing freeloading in Global Virtual Teams: A quasi-experimental approach

Author

Listed:
  • Taras, Vas
  • McLarnon, Matthew
  • Steel, Piers
  • O'Neil, Thomas

Abstract

Freeloading, a challenge faced by all workgroups but particularly acute in global virtual teams (GVTs), is an increasing concern as GVTs become increasingly ubiquitous in international business settings. This study employed a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different strategies grounded in equity theory for mitigating freeloading behavior in GVTs. The study used a sample of 2,022 GVTs comprising 12,536 business students from 43 countries who, for two months, worked on international business consulting projects. The results indicate that freeloading could be significantly reduced if the performance management system promotes a sense of equity and fairness by visible monitoring of individual effort coupled with the threat of reciprocations for insufficient contributions. Importantly, making a lack of individual effort visible through regular peer evaluations but taking no immediate punitive action could reduce perceived fairness and actually increase freeloading. The implications of these findings for practice and future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Taras, Vas & McLarnon, Matthew & Steel, Piers & O'Neil, Thomas, 2024. "Reducing freeloading in Global Virtual Teams: A quasi-experimental approach," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(5).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:59:y:2024:i:5:s1090951624000464
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951624000464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jimenez, Alfredo & Boehe, Dirk M. & Taras, Vasyl & Caprar, Dan V., 2017. "Working Across Boundaries: Current and Future Perspectives on Global Virtual Teams," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 341-349.
    2. Laku Chidambaram & Lai Lai Tung, 2005. "Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 149-168, June.
    3. Hambley, Laura A. & O'Neill, Thomas A. & Kline, Theresa J.B., 2007. "Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Mulvey, Paul W. & Klein, Howard J., 1998. "The Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 62-87, April.
    5. George J. Stigler, 1974. "Free Riders and Collective Action: An Appendix to Theories of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 5(2), pages 359-365, Autumn.
    6. Miles, Jeffrey A. & Greenberg, Jerald, 1993. "Using Punishment Threats to Attenuate Social Loafing Effects among Swimmers," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 246-265, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vveinhardt Jolita & Banikonytė Justina, 2017. "Development Perspectives of the Social Group Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 185-202, June.
    2. George, Charles & Gibson, Cristina B. & Barbour, Jennifer, 2022. "Shared leadership across cultures: Do traditionalism and virtuality matter?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    3. Richter, Nicole Franziska & Martin, Jonathan & Hansen, Sofie V. & Taras, Vasyl & Alon, Ilan, 2021. "Motivational configurations of cultural intelligence, social integration, and performance in global virtual teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 351-367.
    4. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.
    5. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    6. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    7. Dirk Alboth & Anat Lerner & Jonathan Shalev, 2001. "Profit Maximizing in Auctions of Public Goods," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 3(4), pages 501-525, October.
    8. Bart A. De Jong & Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema & Laura B. Cardinal, 2014. "Stronger Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Performance Implications of Peer Control Combinations in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1703-1721, December.
    9. Robert Tollison, 2012. "The economic theory of rent seeking," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 73-82, July.
    10. Zaidman, Nurit & Cohen, Hilla, 2020. "Micro-dynamics of stress and coping with cultural differences in high tech global teams," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    11. Ganga Sajeewani Karunathilaka, 2022. "Virtual Team Adaptation: Management Perspective on Individual Differences," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Turgut Karakose & Ibrahim Kocabas & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol, 2022. "The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Schmidt, Heiko M. & Santamaria-Alvarez, Sandra Milena, 2022. "Routines in International Business: A semi-systematic review of the concept," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    14. Harold Mulherin, J., 2007. "Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: Conceptual issues in securities markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 421-437, June.
    15. Carlo Secchi & Antonio Villafranca (ed.), 2011. "Global Governance and the Role of the EU," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14411.
    16. Robert McCormick & Richard McKenzie, 1979. "The cost of voting: Its fiscal impact on government," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 271-284, September.
    17. Maren Gierlich-Joas & Thomas Hess & Rahild Neuburger, 2020. "More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 921-947, November.
    18. Paul Pecorino, 2013. "Monopolistic Competition and Public Good Provision with By‐product Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 875-893, December.
    19. XiaoHu Wang & XiaNan Wei & Montgomery Wart & Alma McCarthy & Cheol Liu & Soonhee Kim & David H. Ready, 2023. "The role of E-leadership in ICT utilization: a project management perspective," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 99-113, June.
    20. Garcia-Canal, Esteban & Valdes, Ana & Ariño, Africa, 1999. "More than two are a crowd. Different paths to effectiveness in dyadic and multi-party joint ventures," IESE Research Papers D/385, IESE Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:59:y:2024:i:5:s1090951624000464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.