IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v167y2023ics0305750x2300075x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the potential of international carbon markets to increase global climate ambition

Author

Listed:
  • Piris-Cabezas, Pedro
  • Lubowski, Ruben N.
  • Leslie, Gabriela

Abstract

By helping achieve emissions targets more inexpensively than expected, emissions trading systems can lower political resistance to more ambitious targets, enabling deeper and faster cuts in emissions over time. Using a dynamic global partial-equilibrium carbon market model, we quantify cost savings under scenarios for emissions trading within and across countries, as well as the corresponding potential to escalate reductions if those cost savings were translated into greater mitigation.We find global use of carbon markets could allow the world to nearly double climate ambition relative to current Paris pledges (NDCs) over 2020–2035, without increasing total costs compared to a base case without international markets.Significant potential to enhance ambition remain under scenarios where market participation is limited using a “heat map” analysis of countries’ market readiness, as well as with policy uncertainty that delays climate investments. We also find that since protecting tropical forests offers so much low-cost mitigation potential, linking reduced deforestation to an international carbon market drives a majority of the potential ambition gains across the modeled scenarios. International markets, including for deforestation, play a potentially even more critical role as global ambition increases, with roughly double the volume and ten-fold the value of international transactions if countries’ Paris pledges scale up to limit warming to 2°C. Under this scenario, global use of carbon markets lowers costs by two thirds, enabling one third more reductions for the same cost as without international markets, a gain sufficient to keep options open for limiting warming to 1.5°C. High-integrity approaches for international market cooperation—as envisioned under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and with the inclusion of tropical forests as a priority—thus merit significant policy attention as means of closing the global emissions gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Piris-Cabezas, Pedro & Lubowski, Ruben N. & Leslie, Gabriela, 2023. "Estimating the potential of international carbon markets to increase global climate ambition," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x2300075x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X2300075X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Schmalensee & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Lessons Learned from Three Decades of Experience with Cap and Trade," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 59-79.
    2. Erik Haites, 2018. "Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 955-966, September.
    3. Keigo Akimoto & Fuminori Sano & Bianka Shoai Tehrani, 2017. "The analyses on the economic costs for achieving the nationally determined contributions and the expected global emission pathways," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 193-206, June.
    4. William D. Nordhaus & Joseph G. Boyer, 1999. "Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 93-130.
    5. Liu, Weifeng & McKibbin, Warwick J. & Morris, Adele C. & Wilcoxen, Peter J., 2020. "Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. TCHUNG-MING Stephane & DIAZ VAZQUEZ Ana R. & KERAMIDAS Kimon, 2018. "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018: Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," JRC Research Reports JRC114840, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Hof, Andries F. & den Elzen, Michel G.J. & Admiraal, Annemiek & Roelfsema, Mark & Gernaat, David E.H.J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2017. "Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2°C and 1.5°C," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 30-40.
    8. Mustafa Babiker & John Reilly & Laurent Viguier, 2004. "Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 25(2), pages 33-56, April.
    9. Golub, Alexander A. & Lubowski, Ruben N. & Piris-Cabezas, Pedro, 2020. "Business responses to climate policy uncertainty: Theoretical analysis of a twin deferral strategy and the risk-adjusted price of carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Joeri Rogelj & Michel den Elzen & Niklas Höhne & Taryn Fransen & Hanna Fekete & Harald Winkler & Roberto Schaeffer & Fu Sha & Keywan Riahi & Malte Meinshausen, 2016. "Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7609), pages 631-639, June.
    11. Golub, Alexander & Lubowski, Ruben & Piris-Cabezas, Pedro, 2017. "Balancing Risks from Climate Policy Uncertainties: The Role of Options and Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 90-98.
    12. Joseph Aldy & William Pizer & Massimo Tavoni & Lara Aleluia Reis & Keigo Akimoto & Geoffrey Blanford & Carlo Carraro & Leon E. Clarke & James Edmonds & Gokul C. Iyer & Haewon C. McJeon & Richard Riche, 2016. "Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1000-1004, November.
    13. Ruben N. Lubowski & Steven K. Rose, 2013. "The Potential for REDD+: Key Economic Modeling Insights and Issues," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 67-90, January.
    14. Vandyck, Toon & Saveyn, Bert & Keramidas, Kimon & Kitous, Alban & Vrontisi, Zoi, 2016. "A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: implications for energy systems and economy," Conference papers 332704, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. World Bank & Ecofys & Vivid Economics, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016," World Bank Publications - Reports 25160, The World Bank Group.
    16. Ian Parry & Victor Mylonas & Nate Vernon, 2021. "Mitigation Policies for the Paris Agreement: An Assessment for G20 Countries," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(4), pages 797-823.
    17. Baran Doda & Luca Taschini, 2017. "Carbon Dating: When Is It Beneficial to Link ETSs?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(3), pages 701-730.
    18. Christoph Boehringer & Sonja Peterson & Thomas F. Rutherford & Jan Schneider & Malte Winkler, 2021. "Climate Policies after Paris: Pledge, Trade and Recycle Insights from the 36th Energy Modeling Forum Study (EMF36)," Working Papers V-434-21, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised May 2021.
    19. Thube, Sneha D. & Delzeit, Ruth & Henning, Christian H.C.A., 2022. "Economic gains from global cooperation in fulfilling climate pledges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Adam Rose & Dan Wei & Noah Miller & Toon Vandyck & Christian Flachsland, 2018. "Policy Brief—Achieving Paris Climate Agreement Pledges: Alternative Designs for Linking Emissions Trading Systems," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 170-182.
    21. Robert O. Keohane & Michael Oppenheimer, 2016. "Paris: Beyond the Climate Dead End through Pledge and Review?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 142-151.
    22. James Edmonds & Sha Yu & Haewon Mcjeon & Dirk Forrister & Joseph Aldy & Nathan Hultman & Ryna Cui & Stephanie Waldhoff & Leon Clarke & Stefano De Clara & Clayton Munnings, 2021. "How Much Could Article 6 Enhance Nationally Determined Contribution Ambition Toward Paris Agreement Goals Through Economic Efficiency?," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 1-18, May.
    23. KERAMIDAS Kimon & FOSSE Florian & DIAZ VAZQUEZ Ana & DOWLING Paul & GARAFFA Rafael & DESPRÉS Jacques & RUSS Hans Peter & SCHADE Burkhard & SCHMITZ Andreas & SORIA RAMIREZ Antonio & VANDYCK Toon & WEIT, 2021. "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2021: Advancing towards climate neutrality," JRC Research Reports JRC126767, Joint Research Centre.
    24. Mani,Muthukumara S. & Hussein,Zekarias & Gopalakrishnan,Badri Narayanan & Wadhwa,Deepika, 2018. "Paris climate agreement and the global economy : winners and losers," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8392, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anh Quynh Tang & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2024. "Quantitative Approaches for Analyzing the Potential Effectiveness of Vietnam’s Emissions Trading System: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Wang, Kai-Hua & Wang, Zu-Shan & Yunis, Manal & Kchouri, Bilal, 2023. "Spillovers and connectedness among climate policy uncertainty, energy, green bond and carbon markets: A global perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Sebasti'an Leavy & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Marco Antonio Montoya & Edson Talamini, 2024. "Measuring the bioeconomy economically: exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations," Papers 2403.08886, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qingyong & Mao, Xianqiang & Lu, Jianhong & Guo, Zhi & Duman, Zaenhaer & Chen, Yongpeng & Song, Peng & Tu, Kevin, 2024. "EU-Russia energy decoupling in combination with the updated NDCs impacts on global fossil energy trade and carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    2. Thube, Sneha D. & Delzeit, Ruth & Henning, Christian H.C.A., 2022. "Economic gains from global cooperation in fulfilling climate pledges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Isabella Alloisio & Simone Borghesi & Francesco Nicolli, 2022. "Increasing the ambition of the EU Nationally Determined Contribution: lessons from a survey of experts and students," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(2), pages 517-542, July.
    4. Strand,Jon, 2022. "Prospects for Markets for Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes under theParis Agreement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10045, The World Bank.
    5. Doda, Baran & Quemin, Simon & Taschini, Luca, 2019. "Linking permit markets multilaterally," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Su, Chi Wei & Wei, Shenkai & Wang, Yan & Tao, Ran, 2024. "How does climate policy uncertainty affect the carbon market?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Liu, Weifeng & McKibbin, Warwick J. & Morris, Adele C. & Wilcoxen, Peter J., 2020. "Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Böhringer, Christoph & Peterson, Sonja & Rutherford, Thomas F. & Schneider, Jan & Winkler, Malte, 2021. "Climate policies after Paris: Pledge, Trade and Recycle," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Fabio Antoniou & Panos Hatzipanayotou & Nikos Tsakiris, 2021. "Strategic Export Motives and Linking Emission Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 8847, CESifo.
    10. Ritter, Hendrik & Zimmermann, Karl, 2019. "Cap-and-Trade Policy vs. Carbon Taxation: Of Leakage and Linkage," EconStor Preprints 197796, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Liu, Zhonglu & He, Shuguang & Men, Wenjiao & Sun, Haibo, 2024. "Impact of climate risk on financial stability: Cross-country evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Mario A. Fernandez & Adam J. Daigneault, 2018. "Money Does Grow On Trees: Impacts Of The Paris Agreement On The New Zealand Economy," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Zhao, Hengsong, 2023. "Tracking policy uncertainty under climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Golub, Alexander & Herrera, Diego & Leslie, Gabriela & Pietracci, Breno & Lubowski, Ruben, 2021. "A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    15. Elisabeth Eide & Risto Kunelius, 2021. "Voices of a generation the communicative power of youth activism," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Arvaniti, Maria & Habla, Wolfgang, 2021. "The political economy of negotiating international carbon markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Mehling, Michael A. & Metcalf, Gilbert E. & Stavins, Robert N., 2017. "Linking Heterogeneous Climate Policies (Consistent with the Paris Agreement)," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266282, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    18. Geng Qin & Hanzhi Yu, 2023. "Rescuing the Paris Agreement: Improving the Global Experimentalist Governance by Reclassifying Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Christoph Bohringer & Heinz Welsch, 2006. "Burden sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 981-996.
    20. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Purohit, Pallav & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Dong, Kangyin & Liu, Li-Jing, 2022. "The cost-benefit comparisons of China's and India's NDCs based on carbon marginal abatement cost curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:167:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x2300075x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.