IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v47y2011i6p1005-1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics for quay crane scheduling at indented berth

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jiang Hang
  • Lee, Der-Horng
  • Cao, Jin Xin

Abstract

This paper discusses the quay crane scheduling problem at indented berth, an extension to the current quay crane scheduling problem in the field of container terminal operation. A mixed integer programming model by considering the unique features of the quay crane scheduling problem at indented berth is formulated. For solution, decomposition heuristic framework is developed and enhanced by Tabu search. To evaluate the performance of the proposed heuristic framework, a comprehensive numerical test is carried out and its results show the good quality of the proposed heuristic framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jiang Hang & Lee, Der-Horng & Cao, Jin Xin, 2011. "Heuristics for quay crane scheduling at indented berth," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1005-1020.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:47:y:2011:i:6:p:1005-1020
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554511000469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2011.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    2. Ghirardi, M. & Potts, C. N., 2005. "Makespan minimization for scheduling unrelated parallel machines: A recovering beam search approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 457-467, September.
    3. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    4. B Srivastava, 1998. "An effective heuristic for minimising makespan on unrelated parallel machines," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 49(8), pages 886-894, August.
    5. S. L. van de Velde, 1993. "Duality-Based Algorithms for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 192-205, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    2. Simon Emde, 2017. "Optimally scheduling interfering and non‐interfering cranes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(6), pages 476-489, September.
    3. Lashkari, Shabnam & Wu, Yong & Petering, Matthew E.H., 2017. "Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 521-534.
    4. Shang, Xiao Ting & Cao, Jin Xin & Ren, Jie, 2016. "A robust optimization approach to the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 44-65.
    5. Noura Al-Dhaheri & Ali Diabat, 2017. "A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the multi-ship quay crane scheduling problem with ship stability constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Nils Boysen & Simon Emde & Malte Fliedner, 2012. "Determining crane areas for balancing workload among interfering and noninterfering cranes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(8), pages 656-662, December.
    7. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    8. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    10. Wu, Lingxiao & Yang, Dong & Wang, Shuaian & Yuan, Yun, 2020. "Evacuating offshore working barges from a land reclamation site in storm emergencies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanjul-Peyro, Luis & Ruiz, Rubén, 2010. "Iterated greedy local search methods for unrelated parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 55-69, November.
    2. Zhen, Lu & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2011. "A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 54-68, July.
    3. Dusan Ku & Tiru S. Arthanari, 2016. "On double cycling for container port productivity improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 55-70, August.
    4. Evrim Ursavas, 2017. "Crane allocation with stability considerations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 379-401, June.
    5. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    6. Hongming Li & Xintao Li, 2022. "A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Bi-Objective Quay Crane Scheduling Problem Based on Efficiency and Energy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    8. Chen, Lu & Langevin, André & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Integrated scheduling of crane handling and truck transportation in a maritime container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 142-152.
    9. Jayanth Krishna Mogali & Joris Kinable & Stephen F. Smith & Zachary B. Rubinstein, 2021. "Scheduling for multi-robot routing with blocking and enabling constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 291-318, June.
    10. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    11. Canrong Zhang & Tao Wu & Mingyao Qi & Lixin Miao, 2018. "Simultaneous Allocation of Berths and Quay Cranes under Discrete Berth Situation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(03), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    13. Feifeng Zheng & Yaxin Pang & Ming Liu & Yinfeng Xu, 2020. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the general quay crane double-cycling problem with internal-reshuffles," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 708-724, April.
    14. Giorgi Tadumadze & Simon Emde & Heiko Diefenbach, 2020. "Exact and heuristic algorithms for scheduling jobs with time windows on unrelated parallel machines," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 461-497, June.
    15. Defeng Sun & Lixin Tang & Roberto Baldacci & Zihan Chen, 2024. "A Decomposition Method for the Group-Based Quay Crane Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 543-570, March.
    16. Nabil Nehme & Bacel Maddah & Isam A. Kaysi, 2021. "An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut Port container terminal," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    17. Guvenc Dik & Erhan Kozan, 2017. "A flexible crane scheduling methodology for container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 64-96, March.
    18. Chung-Yee Lee & Ming Liu & Chengbin Chu, 2015. "Optimal Algorithm for the General Quay Crane Double-Cycling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 957-967, November.
    19. Gabriela N. Maschietto & Yassine Ouazene & Martín G. Ravetti & Maurício C. de Souza & Farouk Yalaoui, 2017. "Crane scheduling problem with non-interference constraints in a steel coil distribution centre," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1607-1622, March.
    20. Dirk Briskorn & Florian Jaehn & Andreas Wiehl, 2019. "A generator for test instances of scheduling problems concerning cranes in transshipment terminals," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 45-69, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:47:y:2011:i:6:p:1005-1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.