IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v150y2021ics1366554521001290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario-based stochastic programming for an airline-driven flight rescheduling problem under ground delay programs

Author

Listed:
  • Woo, Young-Bin
  • Moon, Ilkyeong

Abstract

We address an airline-driven flight rescheduling problem within a single airport in which a series of ground delay programs (GDPs) are considered. The objective of the problem is to minimize an airline’s total relevant cost (TRC) consisting of delay costs, misconnection costs, and cancellation costs that would result from flight rescheduling. We introduce three solution approaches—the greedy approach, the stochastic approach, and the min-max approach—that revise the daily flight scheduling whenever the schedule is affected by a GDP or further GDP changes. The greedy approach simply searches for a solution using currently updated static GDP information, and the other two approaches provide a solution by considering possible scenarios for changes of the GDP. Using real-world data in existing literature and some generated scenarios, we present extensive computational results to assess the performance of the approaches. We also report the values of information on GDP the solution approaches refer to. Deliberating various cost parameter settings an airline might consider, we discuss the value of information in implementing the proposed solution approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Woo, Young-Bin & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "Scenario-based stochastic programming for an airline-driven flight rescheduling problem under ground delay programs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1366554521001290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554521001290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avijit Mukherjee & Mark Hansen, 2007. "A Dynamic Stochastic Model for the Single Airport Ground Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 444-456, November.
    2. Brunner, Jens O., 2014. "Rescheduling of flights during ground delay programs with consideration of passenger and crew connections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 236-252.
    3. Liu, Pei-chen Barry & Hansen, Mark & Mukherjee, Avijit, 2008. "Scenario-based air traffic flow management: From theory to practice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 685-702, August.
    4. Songjun Luo & Gang Yu, 1997. "On the Airline Schedule Perturbation Problem Caused by the Ground Delay Program," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 298-311, November.
    5. Richetta, Octavio & Odoni, Amedeo R., 1994. "Dynamic solution to the ground-holding problem in air traffic control," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-185, May.
    6. Hu, Yuzhen & Song, Yan & Zhao, Kang & Xu, Baoguang, 2016. "Integrated recovery of aircraft and passengers after airline operation disruption based on a GRASP algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 97-112.
    7. Lorenzo Brunetta & Guglielmo Guastalla & Lisa Navazio, 1998. "Solving the multi-airport Ground Holding Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 81(0), pages 271-288, June.
    8. Ng, K.K.H. & Lee, C.K.M. & Chan, Felix T.S. & Qin, Yichen, 2017. "Robust aircraft sequencing and scheduling problem with arrival/departure delay using the min-max regret approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 115-136.
    9. Abdelghany, Khaled & Abdelghany, Ahmed & Niznik, Tim, 2007. "Managing severe airspace flow programs: The Airlines’ side of the problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 329-337.
    10. Liu, Yulin & Liu, Yi & Hansen, Mark & Pozdnukhov, Alexey & Zhang, Danqing, 2019. "Using machine learning to analyze air traffic management actions: Ground delay program case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 80-95.
    11. Diao, Xudong & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2018. "A sequence model for air traffic flow management rerouting problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-30.
    12. Octavio Richetta & Amedeo R. Odoni, 1993. "Solving Optimally the Static Ground-Holding Policy Problem in Air Traffic Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 228-238, August.
    13. Lisa Navazio & Giorgio Romanin-Jacur, 1998. "The Multiple Connections Multi-Airport Ground Holding Problem: Models and Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 268-276, August.
    14. Bard, Jonathan F. & Mohan, Dinesh Natarajan, 2008. "Reallocating arrival slots during a ground delay program," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 113-134, February.
    15. Alexandre Jacquillat & Amedeo R. Odoni, 2015. "An Integrated Scheduling and Operations Approach to Airport Congestion Mitigation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1390-1410, December.
    16. Peter B. Vranas & Dimitris J. Bertsimas & Amedeo R. Odoni, 1994. "The Multi-Airport Ground-Holding Problem in Air Traffic Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 249-261, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Weitiao & Li, Yu, 2024. "Pareto truck fleet sizing for bike relocation with stochastic demand: Risk-averse multi-stage approximate stochastic programming," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Wen, Xin & Chung, Sai-Ho & Ji, Ping & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2022. "Individual scheduling approach for multi-class airline cabin crew with manpower requirement heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Schrotenboer, Albert H. & Wenneker, Rob & Ursavas, Evrim & Zhu, Stuart X., 2023. "Reliable reserve-crew scheduling for airlines," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Scaini, Giovanni, 2021. "Flexibility in strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brunner, Jens O., 2014. "Rescheduling of flights during ground delay programs with consideration of passenger and crew connections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 236-252.
    2. Alexander S. Estes & Michael O. Ball, 2020. "Equity and Strength in Stochastic Integer Programming Models for the Dynamic Single Airport Ground-Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 944-955, July.
    3. Bard, Jonathan F. & Mohan, Dinesh Natarajan, 2008. "Reallocating arrival slots during a ground delay program," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 113-134, February.
    4. Churchill, Andrew M. & Lovell, David J., 2012. "Coordinated aviation network resource allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 19-33.
    5. Mukherjee, Avijit & Hansen, Mark, 2009. "A dynamic rerouting model for air traffic flow management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 159-171, January.
    6. Murça, Mayara Condé Rocha, 2018. "Collaborative air traffic flow management: Incorporating airline preferences in rerouting decisions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 97-107.
    7. Chen, Yunxiang & Zhao, Yifei & Wu, Yexin, 2024. "Recent progress in air traffic flow management: A review," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Guo, Yechenfeng & Hu, Minghua & Zou, Bo & Hansen, Mark & Zhang, Ying & Xie, Hua, 2022. "Air Traffic Flow Management Integrating Separation Management and Ground Holding: An Efficiency-Equity Bi-objective Perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 394-423.
    9. Rossi, Fabrizio & Smriglio, Stefano, 2001. "A set packing model for the ground holding problem in congested networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 400-416, June.
    10. Michael O. Ball & Robert Hoffman & Avijit Mukherjee, 2010. "Ground Delay Program Planning Under Uncertainty Based on the Ration-by-Distance Principle," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Ghoneim, Ayman & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "A multiobjective distance separation methodology to determine sector-level minimum separation for safe air traffic scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 226-240.
    12. Dimitris Bertsimas & Shubham Gupta, 2016. "Fairness and Collaboration in Network Air Traffic Flow Management: An Optimization Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 57-76, February.
    13. Cynthia Barnhart & Dimitris Bertsimas & Constantine Caramanis & Douglas Fearing, 2012. "Equitable and Efficient Coordination in Traffic Flow Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 262-280, May.
    14. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 2000. "The Traffic Flow Management Rerouting Problem in Air Traffic Control: A Dynamic Network Flow Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, August.
    15. Stojkovic, Goran & Soumis, François & Desrosiers, Jacques & Solomon, Marius M., 2002. "An optimization model for a real-time flight scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 779-788, November.
    16. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar, 2021. "Airport capacity management: A review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Mukherjee, Avijit, 2004. "Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Models for Air Traffic Flow Management," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2vk8w6nc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Jay M. Rosenberger & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser, 2003. "Rerouting Aircraft for Airline Recovery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 408-421, November.
    19. Kammoun, Mohamed Ali & Rezg, Nidhal, 2018. "An efficient hybrid approach for resolving the aircraft routing and rescheduling problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 73-87.
    20. Yi Liu & Mark Hansen, 2016. "Incorporating Predictability Into Cost Optimization for Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 132-149, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:150:y:2021:i:c:s1366554521001290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.