IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v57y2013icp326-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the distribution of urban road space for multimodal congested networks

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Nan
  • Geroliminis, Nikolas

Abstract

Transport systems in real cities are complex with many modes of transport sharing and competing for limited road space. This work intends to understand how space distributions for modes and interactions among modes affect network traffic performance. While the connection between performance of transport systems and general land allocation is the subject of extensive research, space allocation for interacting modes of transport is an open research question. Quantifying the impact of road space distribution on the performance of a congested multimodal transport system with a dynamic aggregated model remains a challenge. In this paper, a multimodal macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) is developed to represent the traffic dynamics of a multimodal transport system. Optimization is performed with the objective of minimizing the total passenger hours traveled (PHT) to serve the total demand by redistributing road space among modes. Pricing strategies are also investigated to provide a higher demand shift to more efficient modes. We find by an application to a bi-modal two-region city that (i) the proposed model captures the operational characteristics of each mode, and (ii) optimal dynamic space distribution strategies can be developed. In practice, the approach can serve as a physical dynamic model to inform space distribution strategies for policy makers with different goals of mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "On the distribution of urban road space for multimodal congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 326-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:57:y:2013:i:c:p:326-341
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261513001021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    2. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    3. Eric J. Gonzales & Nikolas Geroliminis & Michael J. Cassidy & Carlos F. Daganzo, 2010. "On the allocation of city space to multiple transport modes," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 643-656, September.
    4. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Gayah, Vikash V. & Gonzales, Eric J., 2011. "Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 278-288, January.
    5. Vickrey, William S, 1969. "Congestion Theory and Transport Investment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 251-260, May.
    6. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2008. "An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 771-781, November.
    7. Ceder, Avishai & Wilson, Nigel H. M., 1986. "Bus network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 331-344, August.
    8. Nikolas Geroliminis & David M. Levinson, 2009. "Cordon Pricing Consistent with the Physics of Overcrowding," Springer Books, in: William H. K. Lam & S. C. Wong & Hong K. Lo (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, chapter 0, pages 219-240, Springer.
    9. S. Chandana Wirasinghe & Vanolin F. Hurdle & Gordon F. Newell, 1977. "Optimal Parameters for a Coordinated Rail and Bus Transit System," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 359-374, November.
    10. Ji, Yuxuan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2012. "On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1639-1656.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Cassidy, Michael J., 2008. "Effects of high occupancy vehicle lanes on freeway congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 861-872, December.
    12. Daganzo, Carlos F & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2008. "An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4cb8h3jm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Gonzales, Eric J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2012. "Morning commute with competing modes and distributed demand: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1519-1534.
    14. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    15. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Boyacı, Burak, 2012. "The effect of variability of urban systems characteristics in the network capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1607-1623.
    16. Amin Mazloumian & Nikolas Geroliminis & Dirk Helbing, "undated". "The Spatial Variability of Vehicle Densities as Determinant of Urban Network Capacity," Working Papers CCSS-09-009, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    17. Jiang, Yanqun & Wong, S.C. & Ho, H.W. & Zhang, Peng & Liu, Ruxun & Sumalee, Agachai, 2011. "A dynamic traffic assignment model for a continuum transportation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 343-363, February.
    18. Dahlgren, Joy, 1998. "High occupancy vehicle lanes: Not always more effective than general purpose lanes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-114, February.
    19. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2007. "Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 49-62, January.
    20. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Sun, Jie, 2011. "Properties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 605-617, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 261-285.
    2. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2016. "Modeling the morning commute for urban networks with cruising-for-parking: An MFD approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 470-494.
    3. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    4. Leclercq, Ludovic & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 468-484.
    5. Du, Jie & Wong, S.C. & Shu, Chi-Wang & Zhang, Mengping, 2015. "Reformulating the Hoogendoorn–Bovy predictive dynamic user-optimal model in continuum space with anisotropic condition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 189-217.
    6. Haddad, Jack & Ramezani, Mohsen & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 17-36.
    7. Ramezani, Mohsen & Haddad, Jack & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2015. "Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-19.
    8. Loder, Allister & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Axhausen, Kay W., 2022. "Optimal pricing and investment in a multi-modal city — Introducing a macroscopic network design problem based on the MFD," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 113-132.
    9. Zhang, Lele & Garoni, Timothy M & de Gier, Jan, 2013. "A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-23.
    10. Du, Jie & Wong, S.C. & Shu, Chi-Wang & Xiong, Tao & Zhang, Mengping & Choi, Keechoo, 2013. "Revisiting Jiang’s dynamic continuum model for urban cities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-119.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Lehe, Lewis J., 2015. "Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 89-99.
    12. Ambühl, Lukas & Loder, Allister & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Menendez, Monica & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "A functional form with a physical meaning for the macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 119-132.
    13. Guo, Qiangqiang & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2020. "Macroscopic fundamental diagram based perimeter control considering dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 87-109.
    14. Gayah, Vikash V. & Gao, Xueyu (Shirley) & Nagle, Andrew S., 2014. "On the impacts of locally adaptive signal control on urban network stability and the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 255-268.
    15. Aghamohammadi, Rafegh & Laval, Jorge A., 2020. "Dynamic traffic assignment using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: A Review of vehicular and pedestrian flow models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 99-118.
    16. Xu, Guanhao & Gayah, Vikash V., 2023. "Non-unimodal and non-concave relationships in the network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram caused by hierarchical streets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 203-227.
    17. Wada, Kentaro & Satsukawa, Koki & Smith, Mike & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2019. "Network throughput under dynamic user equilibrium: Queue spillback, paradox and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-413.
    18. Jin, Wen-Long & Gan, Qi-Jian & Gayah, Vikash V., 2013. "A kinematic wave approach to traffic statics and dynamics in a double-ring network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 114-131.
    19. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Sun, Jie, 2011. "Hysteresis phenomena of a Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram in freeway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 966-979, November.
    20. Daganzo, Carlos F & Lehe, Lewis J, 2014. "Distance-dependent Congestion Pricing for Downtown Zones," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9vz1b9rs, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:57:y:2013:i:c:p:326-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.