IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v29y1995i3p201-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete choice with an oddball alternative

Author

Listed:
  • Recker, W. W.

Abstract

A discrete choice model is presented that explicitly recognizes differences in the error structure associated with a single "oddball" alternative within the choice set that has properties not common to the other alternatives. The model purportedly resolves questions related to the use of alternative-specific variables in transportation choice models to capture the effects of attributes unique to a single travel alternative, such as "schedule frequency" in the case of modal choice between personal auto and public transit. The model, which shares the general error structure of multinomial logit, is shown to be a modification of a multinomial logit subchoice by terms involving the exponential integral. The model is shown to yield different results from those produced by an equivalent multinomial logit specification. Comparisons to multinomial probit and nested logit formulations are also made.

Suggested Citation

  • Recker, W. W., 1995. "Discrete choice with an oddball alternative," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 201-211, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:29:y:1995:i:3:p:201-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(95)00002-U
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel L. Horowitz, 1983. "Statistical Comparison of Non-Nested Probabilistic Discrete Choice Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 319-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Jang, Sunghoon, 2024. "Alternate closed-form weibit-based model for assessing travel choice with an oddball alternative," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. del Castillo, J.M., 2016. "A class of RUM choice models that includes the model in which the utility has logistic distributed errors," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-20.
    3. Koppelman, Frank S. & Wen, Chieh-Hua, 2000. "The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 75-89, February.
    4. Brathwaite, Timothy & Walker, Joan L., 2018. "Asymmetric, closed-form, finite-parameter models of multinomial choice," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 78-112.
    5. Tinessa, Fiore, 2021. "Closed-form random utility models with mixture distributions of random utilities: Exploring finite mixtures of qGEV models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 262-288.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haab, Timothy C. & Hicks, Robert L., 1997. "Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 127-147, October.
    2. Michael Scheidler & Reinhard Hujer & Joachim Grammig, 2005. "Discrete choice modelling in airline network management," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 467-486.
    3. Guevara, C. Angelo & Fukushi, Mitsuyoshi, 2016. "Modeling the decoy effect with context-RUM Models: Diagrammatic analysis and empirical evidence from route choice SP and mode choice RP case studies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 318-337.
    4. Evangelinos, Christos & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2018. "Pricing workplace parking via cash-out: Effects on modal choice and implications for transport policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 369-380.
    5. Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2023. "Rational inattention in discrete choice models: Estimable specifications of RI-multinomial logit (RI-MNL) and RI-nested logit (RI-NL) models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 53-70.
    6. Louis Grange & Felipe González & Ignacio Vargas & Rodrigo Troncoso, 2015. "A Logit Model With Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Network Externalities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 89-116, March.
    7. Guevara, C. Angelo & Tirachini, Alejandro & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Dekker, Thijs, 2020. "Correcting for endogeneity due to omitted crowding in public transport choice using the Multiple Indicator Solution (MIS) method," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 472-484.
    8. GRAMMIG, Joachim & HUJER, Reinhard & SCHEIDLER, Michael, 2001. "The econometrics of airline network management," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2001055, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    10. Obermeyer, Andy & Treiber, Martin & Evangelinos, Christos, 2015. "On the identification of thresholds in travel choice modelling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Koppelman, Frank S., 2001. "The generalized nested logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 627-641, August.
    12. Koppelman, Frank S. & Wen, Chieh-Hua, 2000. "The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 75-89, February.
    13. Ke Wang & Xin Ye & Jie Ma, 2018. "An empirical analysis of post-work grocery shopping activity duration using modified accelerated failure time model to differentiate time-dependent and time-independent covariates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Nirmale, Sangram Krishna & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2023. "Discrete choice models with multiplicative stochasticity in choice environment variables: Application to accommodating perception errors in driver behaviour models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 169-193.
    15. Evangelinos, Christos & Obermeyer, Andy & Bartel, Aaron, 2020. "The individual monetary valuation of online hotel ratings," IU Discussion Papers - Hospitality, Tourism & Event 3/2020, IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    16. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Tsai, Ming-Chih & Lin, Chih-Huai, 2011. "Classification and competition analysis of air cargo logistics providers: The case of Taiwan’s high-technology industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 106-109.
    17. Christian Lohmann & Thorsten Ohliger, 2017. "Nonlinear Relationships and Their Effect on the Bankruptcy Prediction," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(3), pages 261-287, August.
    18. Luc Anselin, 1988. "Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 279-316, December.
    19. Wezel, Filippo Carlo, 2002. "Why do organizational populations die? : evidence from the Belgian motorcycle industry, 1900-1993," Research Report 02G38, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1996. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choise," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 84, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:29:y:1995:i:3:p:201-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.