IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v126y2019icp414-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of rerouting phenomena in Dynamic Traffic Assignment with the Information Comply Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kucharski, Rafał
  • Gentile, Guido

Abstract

We present the Information Comply Model (ICM) which extends the framework for macroscopic within-day DTA proposed by Gentile (2016) to represent the rerouting of drivers wrt a single traffic event. Rerouting is reproduced as a two-stage process: first, drivers become aware about the event and its consequences on traffic; second, drivers may decide to change path. At each arc, unaware drivers have a probability of being informed by multiple ATIS sources (radio, VMS, mobile apps), which depends not only on devise penetration rates, but also on users space and time coordinates wrt the position and interval of the event. At each node, aware drivers, who are somehow reluctant to change, may finally modify their path based on a random rerouting utility, which is composed of expected gains and avoided losses. ICM is thus capable of representing the evolution of rerouting phenomena in time and space when the information about a traffic event and its consequences on congestion spread among drivers and onto the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Kucharski, Rafał & Gentile, Guido, 2019. "Simulation of rerouting phenomena in Dynamic Traffic Assignment with the Information Comply Model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 414-441.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:414-441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261516309274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fosgerau, Mogens & Frejinger, Emma & Karlstrom, Anders, 2013. "A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 70-80.
    2. Himpe, Willem & Corthout, Ruben & Tampère, M.J. Chris, 2016. "An efficient iterative link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 170-190.
    3. Han, Linghui & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Zhu, Chengjuan, 2011. "Day-to-day evolution of the traffic network with Advanced Traveler Information System," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 914-919.
    4. Gao, Song & Chabini, Ismail, 2006. "Optimal routing policy problems in stochastic time-dependent networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 93-122, February.
    5. Cantarella, Giulio E. & Watling, David P., 2016. "A general stochastic process for day-to-day dynamic traffic assignment: Formulation, asymptotic behaviour, and stability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 3-21.
    6. N. Nezamuddin & Stephen Boyles, 2015. "A Continuous DUE Algorithm Using the Link Transmission Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-483, September.
    7. Khattak, Asad J. & Schofer, Joseph L. & Koppelman, Frank S., 1993. "Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 101-111, April.
    8. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    9. Selten, R. & Chmura, T. & Pitz, T. & Kube, S. & Schreckenberg, M., 2007. "Commuters route choice behaviour," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 394-406, February.
    10. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    11. Bifulco, Gennaro N. & Cantarella, Giulio E. & Simonelli, Fulvio & Velonà, Pietro, 2016. "Advanced traveller information systems under recurrent traffic conditions: Network equilibrium and stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 73-87.
    12. G. E. Cantarella & E. Cascetta, 1995. "Dynamic Processes and Equilibrium in Transportation Networks: Towards a Unifying Theory," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 305-329, November.
    13. Gentile, Guido, 2016. "Solving a Dynamic User Equilibrium model based on splitting rates with Gradient Projection algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 120-147.
    14. Avinash Unnikrishnan & Steven Waller, 2009. "User Equilibrium with Recourse," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 575-593, December.
    15. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2006. "A demand model with departure time choice for within-day dynamic traffic assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1557-1576, December.
    16. Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang & Ziyou Gao & W. Y. Szeto, 2013. "An Intersection-Movement-Based Dynamic User Optimal Route Choice Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1134-1147, October.
    17. Eran Ben-Elia & Erel Avineri, 2015. "Response to Travel Information: A Behavioural Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 352-377, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Rojo, 2020. "Evaluation of Traffic Assignment Models through Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Peftitsi, Soumela & Jenelius, Erik & Cats, Oded, 2022. "Modeling the effect of real-time crowding information (RTCI) on passenger distribution in trains," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 354-368.
    3. Borja Alonso & Vittorio Astarita & Luigi Dell’Olio & Vincenzo Pasquale Giofrè & Giuseppe Guido & Marcella Marino & William Sommario & Alessandro Vitale, 2020. "Validation of Simulated Safety Indicators with Traffic Crash Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasun P Wijayaratna & Vinayak V Dixit & Laurent Denant-Boemont & S Travis Waller, 2017. "An experimental study of the Online Information Paradox: Does en-route information improve road network performance?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Hoang, Nam H. & Vu, Hai L. & Lo, Hong K., 2018. "An informed user equilibrium dynamic traffic assignment problem in a multiple origin-destination stochastic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 207-230.
    3. Paolo Delle Site, 2017. "On the Equivalence Between SUE and Fixed-Point States of Day-to-Day Assignment Processes with Serially-Correlated Route Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 935-962, September.
    4. Stefano de Luca & Roberta Di Pace & Silvio Memoli & Luigi Pariota, 2020. "Sustainable Traffic Management in an Urban Area: An Integrated Framework for Real-Time Traffic Control and Route Guidance Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Liu, Peng & Liao, Feixiong & Tian, Qiong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Timmermans, Harry, 2020. "Day-to-day needs-based activity-travel dynamics and equilibria in multi-state supernetworks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 208-227.
    6. Meneguzzer, Claudio, 2022. "Day-to-day dynamics in a simple traffic network with mixed direct and contrarian route choice behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    7. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang, 2018. "Are We Really Solving the Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Problem with a Departure Time Choice?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 603-620, June.
    8. Qi, Hang & Jia, Ning & Qu, Xiaobo & He, Zhengbing, 2023. "Investigating day-to-day route choices based on multi-scenario laboratory experiments, Part I: Route-dependent attraction and its modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. František Kolovský & Ivana Kolingerová, 2022. "The Piecewise Constant/Linear Solution for Dynamic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 737-765, December.
    10. Ding-Mastera, Jing & Gao, Song & Jenelius, Erik & Rahmani, Mahmood & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2019. "A latent-class adaptive routing choice model in stochastic time-dependent networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-17.
    11. Gentile, Guido, 2016. "Solving a Dynamic User Equilibrium model based on splitting rates with Gradient Projection algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 120-147.
    12. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    14. Zhu, Feng & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2017. "Efficient and fair system states in dynamic transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 272-289.
    15. Yahyamozdarani, Raheleh & Tampère, Chris M.J., 2023. "The continuous signalized (COS) node model for dynamic traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 56-80.
    16. Xiao Han & Yun Yu & Bin Jia & Zi‐You Gao & Rui Jiang & H. Michael Zhang, 2021. "Coordination Behavior in Mode Choice: Laboratory Study of Equilibrium Transformation and Selection," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3635-3656, October.
    17. Sun, Mingmei, 2023. "A day-to-day dynamic model for mixed traffic flow of autonomous vehicles and inertial human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Stephen Boyles & S. Waller, 2011. "Optimal Information Location for Adaptive Routing," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 233-254, June.
    19. Xu, Xin-yue & Liu, Jun & Li, Hai-ying & Jiang, Man, 2016. "Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-148.
    20. S. Waller & David Fajardo & Melissa Duell & Vinayak Dixit, 2013. "Linear Programming Formulation for Strategic Dynamic Traffic Assignment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 427-443, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:414-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.