IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v148y2021icp286-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Updating and transferring Random Effect models: The case of operating speed percentile estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Tremblay, Jean-Michel
  • Cirillo, Cinzia
  • Bassani, Marco

Abstract

Random Effect (RE) models are used for analyzing data that are non-independent or when data are characterized by a hierarchical structure. In traffic and highway engineering, RE models have been successfully employed to estimate free-flow speed distributions from data containing observations that are naturally nested according to different levels (i.e. direction, sections, roads). Empirical studies conducted on both urban arterials and rural two-lane highways have shown that RE models, by properly accounting for the survey design, are superior to traditional Fixed Effect (FE) models. However, RE models are non-transferable because of the unknown RE value for roads or road sections belonging to a different network or road of the same network that were not originally used to develop the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Tremblay, Jean-Michel & Cirillo, Cinzia & Bassani, Marco, 2021. "Updating and transferring Random Effect models: The case of operating speed percentile estimation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 286-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:148:y:2021:i:c:p:286-304
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856421000094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shankar, Venkataraman & Mannering, Fred, 1998. "Modeling the endogeneity of lane-mean speeds and lane-speed deviations: a structural equations approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 311-322, September.
    2. Park, Young-Jin & Saccomanno, Frank F., 2006. "Evaluating speed consistency between successive elements of a two-lane rural highway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 375-385, June.
    3. Himes, Scott C. & Donnell, Eric T. & Porter, Richard J., 2013. "Posted speed limit: To include or not to include in operating speed models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-33.
    4. Cheng, Wen & Gill, Gurdiljot Singh & Sakrani, Taha & Ralls, Dennis & Jia, Xudong, 2018. "Modeling the endogeneity of lane-mean speeds and lane-speed deviations using a Bayesian structural equations approach with spatial correlation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 220-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Himes, Scott C. & Donnell, Eric T. & Porter, Richard J., 2013. "Posted speed limit: To include or not to include in operating speed models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-33.
    2. Coifman, Benjamin A. & Mallika, Ramachandran, 2007. "Distributed surveillance on freeways emphasizing incident detection and verification," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 750-767, October.
    3. Espadaler-Clapés, Jasso & Barmpounakis, Emmanouil & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "Empirical investigation of lane usage, lane changing and lane choice phenomena in a multimodal urban arterial," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Haruna Sekabira & Shamim Nalunga, 2020. "Farm Production Diversity: Is It Important for Dietary Diversity? Panel Data Evidence from Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Jie Yang & Jinliang Xu & Chao Gao & Guohua Bai & Linfang Xie & Menghui Li, 2019. "Modeling of the Relationship Between Speed Limit and Characteristic Speed of Expressway Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    6. repec:aer:wpaper:396 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lu, Qing-Chang & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Zhang, Jingxiao, 2021. "Infrastructure-based transportation network vulnerability modeling and analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    8. He, Sheng-Xue, 2016. "Will a higher free-flow speed lead us to a less congested freeway?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 17-38.
    9. Ponnu, Balaji & Coifman, Benjamin, 2017. "When adjacent lane dependencies dominate the uncongested regime of the fundamental relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 602-615.
    10. Silvano, Ary P. & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Farah, Haneen, 2020. "Free flow speed estimation: A probabilistic, latent approach. Impact of speed limit changes and road characteristics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 283-298.
    11. Park, Young-Jin & Saccomanno, Frank F., 2006. "Evaluating speed consistency between successive elements of a two-lane rural highway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 375-385, June.
    12. Cheng, Wen & Gill, Gurdiljot Singh & Sakrani, Taha & Ralls, Dennis & Jia, Xudong, 2018. "Modeling the endogeneity of lane-mean speeds and lane-speed deviations using a Bayesian structural equations approach with spatial correlation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 220-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:148:y:2021:i:c:p:286-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.