IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v103y2017icp83-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How network structure can boost and shape the demand for bus transit

Author

Listed:
  • Badia, Hugo
  • Argote-Cabanero, Juan
  • Daganzo, Carlos F.

Abstract

Conventional wisdom states that transit riders are averse to transfers and that consequently bus networks should be designed to limit their number. Probably as a result of this belief, many real bus systems try to connect as many origins and destinations as possible without transfers, so they are usually composed of long, circuitous routes with redundant overlapping sections – and the resulting bus map is hard to understand. If coverage is extensive, many routes are needed. Economics then prevents an agency from populating all routes with sufficient buses to provide attractively frequent service. This low frequency and the complicated circuitous map discourage transfers, perpetuating the belief that people are averse to transferring. Not surprisingly, the percentage of bus trips that includes a transfer has been reported to be: 1.5% for Boston, 3% for New York, 13% for London, and 16% for Melbourne.

Suggested Citation

  • Badia, Hugo & Argote-Cabanero, Juan & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2017. "How network structure can boost and shape the demand for bus transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 83-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:103:y:2017:i:c:p:83-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416306589
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "Structure of competitive transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 434-446, May.
    2. Jeffrey Brown & Gregory Thompson, 2008. "Examining the influence of multidestination service orientation on transit service productivity: a multivariate analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 237-252, March.
    3. Estrada, M. & Roca-Riu, M. & Badia, H. & Robusté, F. & Daganzo, C.F., 2011. "Design and implementation of efficient transit networks: Procedure, case study and validity test," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 935-950, November.
    4. Badia, Hugo & Estrada, Miquel & Robusté, Francesc, 2016. "Bus network structure and mobility pattern: A monocentric analytical approach on a grid street layout," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 37-56.
    5. Carlos F. Daganzo, 1987. "The Break-Bulk Role of Terminals in Many-to-Many Logistic Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 543-555, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Rosell, Jordi, 2019. "Effect of a major network reform on bus transit satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 310-333.
    2. Dakic, Igor & Leclercq, Ludovic & Menendez, Monica, 2021. "On the optimization of the bus network design: An analytical approach based on the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-417.
    3. Chinnawat Hoonsiri & Vasin Kiattikomol & Siriluk Chiarakorn, 2020. "Energy Saving and CO 2 Reduction Potential from Partial Bus Routes Reduction Model in Bangkok Urban Fringe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Ansarilari, Zahra & Bodur, Merve & Shalaby, Amer, 2024. "A novel model for transfer synchronization in transit networks and a Lagrangian-based heuristic solution method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 76-91.
    5. Manser, Patrick & Becker, Henrik & Hörl, Sebastian & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Designing a large-scale public transport network using agent-based microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Xin, Mengwei & Shalaby, Amer, 2024. "Investigation of the interaction between urban rail ridership and network topology characteristics using temporal lagged and reciprocal effects: A case study of Chengdu, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Fournier, Nicholas, 2021. "Hybrid pedestrian and transit priority zoning policies in an urban street network: Evaluating network traffic flow impacts with analytical approximation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 254-274.
    8. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Li, Jinpei, 2020. "Does technical efficiency play a mediating role between bus facility scale and ridership attraction? Evidence from bus practices in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 77-96.
    9. Hugo Badia, 2020. "Comparison of Bus Network Structures in Face of Urban Dispersion for a Ring-Radial City," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-271, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caicedo, Angélica & Estrada, Miquel & Medina-Tapia, Marcos & Mayorga, Miguel, 2023. "Optimizing bike network design: A cost-effective methodology for heterogeneous travel demands using continuous approximation techniques," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Dakic, Igor & Yang, Kaidi & Menendez, Monica & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2021. "On the design of an optimal flexible bus dispatching system with modular bus units: Using the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 38-59.
    3. Hugo Badia, 2020. "Comparison of Bus Network Structures in Face of Urban Dispersion for a Ring-Radial City," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-271, March.
    4. Luo, Sida & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "On the role of route choice modeling in transit sketchy design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 223-243.
    5. Dakic, Igor & Leclercq, Ludovic & Menendez, Monica, 2021. "On the optimization of the bus network design: An analytical approach based on the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-417.
    6. Badia, Hugo & Estrada, Miquel & Robusté, Francesc, 2016. "Bus network structure and mobility pattern: A monocentric analytical approach on a grid street layout," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 37-56.
    7. Orlando Barraza & Miquel Estrada, 2021. "Battery Electric Bus Network: Efficient Design and Cost Comparison of Different Powertrains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Luo, Sida & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2019. "Impact of ride-pooling on the nature of transit network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 175-192.
    9. Badia, Hugo & Argote-Cabanero , Juan & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2016. "Network Effects in Bus Transit: Evidence from Barcelona’s Nova Xarxa," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3996t4c6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Moccia, Luigi & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "Improved models for technology choice in a transit corridor with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 245-270.
    11. Ellegood, William A. & Campbell, James F. & North, Jeremy, 2015. "Continuous approximation models for mixed load school bus routing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-198.
    12. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Rosell, Jordi, 2019. "Effect of a major network reform on bus transit satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 310-333.
    13. Badia, Hugo & Estrada, Miquel & Robusté, Francesc, 2014. "Competitive transit network design in cities with radial street patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 161-181.
    14. Chen, Peng (Will) & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2018. "Optimal design of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit: Case of radial route structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 71-89.
    15. Chen, Haoyu & Gu, Weihua & Cassidy, Michael J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2015. "Optimal transit service atop ring-radial and grid street networks: A continuum approximation design method and comparisons," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 755-774.
    16. Fan, Wenbo & Mei, Yu & Gu, Weihua, 2018. "Optimal design of intersecting bimodal transit networks in a grid city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 203-226.
    17. Gu, Weihua & Amini, Zahra & Cassidy, Michael J., 2016. "Exploring alternative service schemes for busy transit corridors," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 126-145.
    18. Proboste, Francisco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Comparing social costs of public transport networks structured around an Open and Closed BRT corridor in medium sized cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 187-212.
    19. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Nourbakhsh, Seyed Mohammad & Cassidy, Michael J., 2014. "Continuum approximation approach to bus network design under spatially heterogeneous demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 333-344.
    20. Fabien Leurent, 2022. "On the ratios of urban mobility, Part 1: the HoTer model of travel demand and network flows," CIRED Working Papers hal-03805030, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:103:y:2017:i:c:p:83-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.