IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v46y2022i10s0308596122001392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The geopolitics of digital rights activism: Evaluating civil society's role in the promises of multistakeholder internet governance

Author

Listed:
  • Grover, Rohan

Abstract

Multistakeholderism is thought to play an important role in democratizing internet governance institutions and processes by including civil society. Therefore, scholars have studied the participation of civil society organizations, from the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society through to the most recent Internet Governance Forum, to understand how they engage in and shape internet governance. However, this category is not well defined; therefore, it is not always clear whose interests are being advanced by civil society organizations. This study evaluates representation in civil society by examining the annual RightsCon conference as an ideal site of civil society engagement in internet governance in order to evaluate the potential of multistakeholderism to achieve the goals of democratization, representation, and inclusion. Through a meso-level analysis of discursive production at RightsCon that operationalizes a critical geopolitical rubric, this study finds that organizations that represent interests from the Global North and West are highly over-represented in three ways: in leading overall discourse, in claiming authority over global issues, and in driving specific topics such as misinformation, privacy, and internet shutdowns. These findings offer an empirical evaluation of global representation in internet governance, raising the stakes for further study about why and how the category of civil society meets expectations. Finally, conceptual implications are discussed, including evaluating earlier critiques of multistakeholderism as less democratizing in reality than in theory, affirming the analytic value of civil society discourse to policy research, and opening up questions about how a more precise understanding of civil society can contribute to multistakeholderism in internet governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Grover, Rohan, 2022. "The geopolitics of digital rights activism: Evaluating civil society's role in the promises of multistakeholder internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:46:y:2022:i:10:s0308596122001392
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596122001392
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanette Hofmann, 2016. "Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: putting a fiction into practice," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 29-49, January.
    2. Wolff, Josephine, 2016. "What we talk about when we talk about cybersecurity: security in internet governance debates," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13.
    3. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    4. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    5. Tjahja, Nadia & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2021. "What is civil society and who represents civil society at the IGF? An analysis of civil society typologies in internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    6. Carmen Malena & Volkhart Finn Heinrich, 2007. "Can we measure civil society? A proposed methodology for international comparative research," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 338-352, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levinson, Nanette S., 2021. "Idea entrepreneurs: The United Nations Open-Ended Working Group & cybersecurity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    2. Pohle, Julia & Voelsen, Daniel, 2022. "Das Netz und die Netze. Vom Wandel des Internets und der globalen digitalen Ordnung [The net and the networks. Transformations of the Internet and the global digital order]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 455-487.
    3. Tjahja, Nadia & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2022. "Who do you think you are? Individual stakeholder identification and mobility at the Internet Governance Forum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    4. Todor Tagarev, 2020. "Towards the Design of a Collaborative Cybersecurity Networked Organisation: Identification and Prioritisation of Governance Needs and Objectives," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Tjahja, Nadia & Potjomkina, Diana, 2024. "An agent of change: Youth meta-participation at the internet governance forum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5).
    6. Radu, Roxana & Kettemann, Matthias C. & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2021. "Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    7. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    8. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    9. Amber van den Akker & Alice Fabbri & Scott Slater & Anna B. Gilmore & Cecile Knai & Harry Rutter, 2024. "Mapping actor networks in global multi-stakeholder initiatives for food system transformation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(5), pages 1223-1234, October.
    10. Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Multistakeholder governance processes as production sites: enhanced cooperation "in the making"," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19.
    11. Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-60.
    12. Monsees, Linda, 2020. "Cryptoparties: Empowerment in internet security?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    13. Trithara, Dakoda, 2024. "Agents of platform governance: Analyzing U.S. civil society's role in contesting online content moderation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    14. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Soberanía digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-1.
    15. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Digital sovereignty," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    16. Kayleigh Bruijn & Panikos Georgallis & João Albino-Pimentel & Arno Kourula & Hildy Teegen, 2024. "MNE–civil society interactions: a systematic review and research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(2), pages 136-156, March.
    17. Haggart, Blayne & Keller, Clara Iglesias, 2021. "Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    18. Palladino, Nicola, 2021. "The role of epistemic communities in the “constitutionalization” of internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    19. Christian Djeffal, 2022. "Children’s Rights by Design and Internet Governance: Revisiting General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children’s Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:46:y:2022:i:10:s0308596122001392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.