IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24001933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revenues of network platforms: can they be expected to follow a growth ‘law’?

Author

Listed:
  • Van Hove, Leo
  • Polasik, Michal
  • Kotkowski, Radoslaw

Abstract

Recent papers assume that whereas the value of ‘traditional’ communications networks follows Metcalfe's law – that is, grows with the square of the number of users – the value of group-forming network platforms should increase faster. The papers see evidence in the fact that the advertising revenues of platforms such as Facebook and Tencent follow a cube law or stronger. We argue that such tests do not make much sense, as they lack a theoretical justification. Growth laws such as Metcalfe's and Reed's were conceived with purely one-sided networks in mind, reason in terms of utility for users, and have little to say about the monetisation of the value created. The results of the very papers that we discuss show that the laws have no generality. We also provide a counterexample of our own and proffer an alternative explanation.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Hove, Leo & Polasik, Michal & Kotkowski, Radoslaw, 2024. "Revenues of network platforms: can they be expected to follow a growth ‘law’?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001933
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001933
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leo Van Hove & Antoine Dubus, 2019. "M-PESA and Financial Inclusion in Kenya: Of Paying Comes Saving?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Madureira, António & den Hartog, Frank & Bouwman, Harry & Baken, Nico, 2013. "Empirical validation of Metcalfe’s law: How Internet usage patterns have changed over time," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 246-256.
    3. Lapo Filistrucchi & Damien Geradin & Eric van Damme & Pauline Affeldt, 2014. "Market Definition In Two-Sided Markets: Theory And Practice," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 293-339.
    4. de Blanes Sebastián, María García & Antonovica, Arta & Sarmiento Guede, José Ramón, 2023. "What are the leading factors for using Spanish peer-to-peer mobile payment platform Bizum? The applied analysis of the UTAUT2 model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Hagiu, Andrei & Wright, Julian, 2015. "Multi-sided platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 162-174.
    6. Leo Van Hove, 2016. "Measuring the value of mobile telecommunications networks," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 191-222, November.
    7. Leo Van Hove, 1999. "Electronic money and the network externalities theory: lessons for real life," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 137-171, October.
    8. Van Hove, Leo, 2016. "Testing Metcalfe's law: Pitfalls and possibilities," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 67-76.
    9. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1994. "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 93-115, Spring.
    10. Daniel Trabucchi & Tommaso Buganza, 2021. "Landlords with no lands: a systematic literature review on hybrid multi-sided platforms and platform thinking," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(6), pages 64-96, March.
    11. Monic Sun & Feng Zhu, 2013. "Ad Revenue and Content Commercialization: Evidence from Blogs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2314-2331, October.
    12. Hemang Subramanian & Sabyasachi Mitra & Sam Ransbotham, 2021. "Capturing Value in Platform Business Models That Rely on User-Generated Content," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 804-823, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcia-Swartz, Daniel D. & Muhamedagić, Mensur & Saenz, Diana, 2019. "The role of prices and network effects in the growth of the iPhone platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 110-122.
    2. Matteo Cinelli & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2022. "Connections matter: a proxy measure for evaluating network membership with an application to the Seventh Research Framework Programme," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3959-3976, July.
    3. Peitz, Martin & Valletti, Tommaso, 2015. "Reassessing competition concerns in electronic communications markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 896-912.
    4. Kubli, Merla & Puranik, Sanket, 2023. "A typology of business models for energy communities: Current and emerging design options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Rangaswamy, Arvind & Moch, Nicole & Felten, Claudio & van Bruggen, Gerrit & Wieringa, Jaap E. & Wirtz, Jochen, 2020. "The Role of Marketing in Digital Business Platforms," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 72-90.
    6. Garcia-Swartz, Daniel D. & Garcia-Vicente, Florencia, 2015. "Network effects on the iPhone platform: An empirical examination," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 877-895.
    7. Lei Huang & Yandong Zhao & Liang Mei & Peiyi Wu & Zhihua Zhao & Yijun Mao, 2019. "Structural Holes in the Multi-Sided Market: A Market Allocation Structure Analysis of China’s Car-Hailing Platform in the Context of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Hildebrandt, Christian & Arnold, René, 2018. "Marktbeobachtung in der digitalen Wirtschaft – Ein Modell zur Analyse von Online-Plattformen," WIK Discussion Papers 427, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    9. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    10. Sheng-Wuu Joe & Shin-Yi Lin & Chou-Kang Chiu, 2010. "Modeling the unethical intention of software piracy: a qualitative integration of network externalities and information cascades," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 191-198, January.
    11. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2019. "The emergence of native multi-sided platforms and their influence on incumbents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 631-647, December.
    12. Mattila, Juri & Seppälä, Timo & Holmström, Jan, 2016. "Product-centric Information Management: A Case Study of a Shared Platform with Blockchain Technology," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt65s5s4b2, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    13. Hakan Ozalp & Carmelo Cennamo & Annabelle Gawer, 2018. "Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1203-1241, November.
    14. Van Hove, Leo, 2018. "Quantifying and interpreting network effects: ‘Own-network’ is not the same as ‘firm-level’," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 47-51.
    15. Krämer, Jan & Wohlfarth, Michael, 2018. "Market power, regulatory convergence, and the role of data in digital markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 154-171.
    16. CARBALLA SMICHOWSKI Bruno & DUCH BROWN Nestor & GOMEZ LOSADA Alvaro & MARTENS Bertin, 2021. "When ‘the’ market loses its relevance: an empirical analysis of demand-side linkages in platform ecosystems," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2021-07, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Vakeel, Khadija Ali & Fudurić, Morana & Malthouse, Edward C., 2021. "Extending variety seeking to multi-sided platforms: Impact of new retailer listing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Dohoon Kim, 2018. "Equilibrium Analysis for Platform Developers in Two-Sided Market with Backward Compatibility," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    20. Soichiro Takagi, 2020. "Literature survey on the economic impact of digital platforms," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 449-464, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.