IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x24000083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robots for sustainability: Evaluating ecological footprints in leading AI-driven industrial nations

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Lei
  • Rasool, Zeeshan
  • Ali, Sajid
  • Wang, Canghong
  • Nazar, Raima

Abstract

By automating tasks with precision and efficiency, industrial robots help minimize resource utilization and emissions, making them indispensable allies in our quest to minimize our ecological footprint. The core intention of the present article is to scrutinize the impact of industrial robots on the ecological footprint in ten leading industrial artificial intelligence nations (Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, USA, China, France, and Italy) from 2007 to 2020. Prior investigations have chosen panel data methodologies to detect the association between industrial robots and ecological footprint. Nonetheless, these studies often overlooked the variations in this relationship across different countries. In contrast, this article choses the Quantile-on-Quantile approach to assess this relationship on a country-specific basis. This methodology offers a comprehensive global perspective while delivering tailored insights relevant to each nation. The findings suggest that industrial robots improve environmental quality by decreasing ecological footprint across different data quantiles in chosen nations. The findings also underline that the asymmetries between our variables differ from country to country. These revelations underscore the importance of policymakers carefully assessing and skillfully managing strategies related to both industrial robots and the ecological footprint.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Lei & Rasool, Zeeshan & Ali, Sajid & Wang, Canghong & Nazar, Raima, 2024. "Robots for sustainability: Evaluating ecological footprints in leading AI-driven industrial nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000083
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24000083
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao, Zhijie, 2009. "Quantile cointegrating regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 248-260, June.
    2. Anna Papp & Douglas Almond & Shuang Zhang, 2023. "Bitcoin and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from Daily Production Decisions," NBER Working Papers 31745, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Saikkonen, Pentti, 1991. "Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Li, Yaya & Zhang, Yuru & Pan, An & Han, Minchun & Veglianti, Eleonora, 2022. "Carbon emission reduction effects of industrial robot applications: Heterogeneity characteristics and influencing mechanisms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Giovanni Dosi, 2000. "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," Chapters, in: Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 63-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Yu, Jinna & Tang, Yuk Ming & Chau, Ka Yin & Nazar, Raima & Ali, Sajid & Iqbal, Wasim, 2022. "Role of solar-based renewable energy in mitigating CO2 emissions: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 216-226.
    7. Guo, Qingbin & Wang, Yong & Dong, Xiaobin, 2022. "Effects of smart city construction on energy saving and CO2 emission reduction: Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    8. Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Ghosh, Sudeshna & Doğan, Buhari, 2023. "Dynamic effect of Bitcoin, fintech and artificial intelligence stocks on eco-friendly assets, Islamic stocks and conventional financial markets: Another look using quantile-based approaches," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Anna Matysiak & Daniela Bellani & Honorata Bogusz, 2023. "Industrial Robots and Regional Fertility in European Countries," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-36, December.
    10. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    11. Hao Lv & Beibei Shi & Nan Li & Rong Kang, 2022. "Intelligent Manufacturing and Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from the Use of Industrial Robots in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Xinping Li & Qiongxia Qin & Yongliang Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the Construction Sector in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Sorrell, Steve & Dimitropoulos, John, 2008. "The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 636-649, April.
    14. Yu Zhou & Caijiang Zhang & Zhangwen Li, 2023. "The impact of digital financial inclusion on household carbon emissions: evidence from China," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Ding, Tao & Li, Jiangyuan & Shi, Xing & Li, Xuhui & Chen, Ya, 2023. "Is artificial intelligence associated with carbon emissions reduction? Case of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    16. Chen, Yang & Cheng, Liang & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Harty D. Saunders, 1992. "The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 131-148.
    18. Yaya Li & Yuru Zhang & An Pan & Minchun Han & Eleonora Veglianti, 2022. "Carbon emission reduction effects of industrial robot applications: Heterogeneity characteristics and influencing mechanisms," Post-Print hal-04522085, HAL.
    19. Xiekui Zhang & Hongfei Zhu, 2023. "The Impact of Industrial Intelligence on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the Three Largest Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "The effects of industrial robots on firm energy intensity: From the perspective of technological innovation and electrification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "The effects of industrial robots on firm energy intensity: From the perspective of technological innovation and electrification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Chang, Lei & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Chen, Huangen & Mohsin, Muhammad, 2022. "Do green bonds have environmental benefits?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "Enhancing energy-environmental performance through industrial intelligence: Insights from Chinese prefectural-level cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    5. Ke Zhao & Chao Wu & Jinquan Liu, 2024. "Can Artificial Intelligence Effectively Improve China’s Environmental Quality? A Study Based on the Perspective of Energy Conservation, Carbon Reduction, and Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Zhao, Qian & Wang, Lu & Stan, Sebastian-Emanuel & Mirza, Nawazish, 2024. "Can artificial intelligence help accelerate the transition to renewable energy?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Yu, Jinna & Saydaliev, Hayot Berk & Liu, Zhen & Nazar, Raima & Ali, Sajid, 2022. "The asymmetric nexus of solar energy and environmental quality: Evidence from Top-10 solar energy-consuming countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. Chang, Juin-Jen & Wang, Wei-Neng & Shieh, Jhy-Yuan, 2018. "Environmental rebounds/backfires: Macroeconomic implications for the promotion of environmentally-friendly products," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 35-68.
    9. Huang, Junbing & Li, Xinghao & Wang, Yajun & Lei, Hongyan, 2021. "The effect of energy patents on China's carbon emissions: Evidence from the STIRPAT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Apergis, Nicholas, 2016. "Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 263-271.
    11. Han, Wang-Zhe & Zhang, Yi-Ming, 2024. "Carbon reduction effect of industrial robots: Breaking the impasse for carbon emissions and development," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    12. Zhou, Wei & Zhuang, Yan & Chen, Yan, 2024. "How does artificial intelligence affect pollutant emissions by improving energy efficiency and developing green technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Zhu, Yuke & Lan, Mudan, 2023. "Digital economy and carbon rebound effect: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Fan, Fei & Dai, Shangze & Yang, Bo & Ke, Haiqian, 2023. "Urban density, directed technological change, and carbon intensity: An empirical study based on Chinese cities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Francesco Nicolli & Francesco Vona & Lionel Nesta, 2012. "Determinants of Renewable Energy Innovation: Environmental Policies vs. Market Regulation," Working Papers 201204, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    16. Fabian Knorre & Martin Wagner & Maximilian Grupe, 2021. "Monitoring Cointegrating Polynomial Regressions: Theory and Application to the Environmental Kuznets Curves for Carbon and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, March.
    17. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Usenobong Akpan & Bisola Aladenika, 2023. "Asymmetric effect of financial globalization on carbon emissions in G7 countries: Fresh insight from quantile-on-quantile regression," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1285-1304, August.
    18. Zhou, Xiaoyan & Zhang, Jie & Li, Junpeng, 2013. "Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 43-51.
    19. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09j0h0ji242 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Lin, Boqiang & Liu, Xia, 2013. "Reform of refined oil product pricing mechanism and energy rebound effect for passenger transportation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 329-337.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.