IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v72y2023ics0160791x22003232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Hyeyoung K.
  • Chung, Joohyun
  • Ha, Jiyeon

Abstract

Many older adults find it difficult to accept new forms of information and communication technology (ICT), despite its advantages such as convenience and efficiency. It is necessary to identify the reasons for low ICT use among older people—even among those with positive attitudes toward ICT—to help older adults cope with social changes and bridge the digital divide. This study explored technology acceptance and related factors among older Korean adults living in rural areas. Based on an existing model (the senior technology acceptance model), a new conceptual framework for technology acceptance was proposed, and the framework was tested using pathway analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in three focus groups (n = 15), and a survey questionnaire was administered to older Korean adults living in a rural area (n = 233) from 17 January 2021 to 18 February 2021. Qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis, and quantitative data were analyzed using pathway analysis. Four categories, 11 subcategories, and 18 codes were identified, and a new conceptual framework was proposed based on the qualitative findings. The results of the model revealed significant positive direct paths from external controls (β = 0.45, p < .001), attitudinal beliefs (β = 0.33, p < .001), and cognitive health (β = 0.10, p = .040) to internal abilities. It is necessary to develop and apply a targeted and tailored ICT education program to improve self-efficacy and reduce anxiety regarding technology use among older Korean adults living in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Hyeyoung K. & Chung, Joohyun & Ha, Jiyeon, 2023. "Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22003232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elimelech, Ortal Cohen & Ferrante, Simona & Josman, Naomi & Meyer, Sonya & Lunardini, Francesca & Gómez-Raja, Jonathan & Galán, Carmen & Cáceres, Pilar & Sciama, Piera & Gros, Marianne & Vurro, Clodia, 2022. "Technology use characteristics among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-cultural survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Park, Sunhee & Kim, Beomsoo, 2022. "The impact of everyday AI-based smart speaker use on the well-being of older adults living alone," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Y Alicia Hong & Jinmyoung Cho, 2017. "Has the Digital Health Divide Widened? Trends of Health-Related Internet Use Among Older Adults From 2003 to 2011," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 856-863.
    4. Singh, Nidhi & Misra, Richa & Singh, Sonali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Khorana, Sangeeta, 2022. "Assessing the factors that influence the adoption of healthcare wearables by the older population using an extended PMT model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teichmann, Fabian & Boticiu, Sonia & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "RegTech – Potential benefits and challenges for businesses," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. MoonKi Choi, 2020. "Association of eHealth Use, Literacy, Informational Social Support, and Health-Promoting Behaviors: Mediation of Health Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Yuen, Kum Fai & Ng, Wei Hong & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Switching intention in the online crowdsourced delivery environment: The influence of a platform's technological characteristics and relational bonding strategies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Roppelt, Julia Stefanie & Kanbach, Dominik K. & Kraus, Sascha, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in healthcare institutions: A systematic literature review on influencing factors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Pinheiro Amâncio, Fernanda Maria & Souza, Ana Paula & Fantinato, Marcelo & Peres, Sarajane Marques & Hung, Patrick C.K. & Coutinho do Rêgo, Luis Gustavo & Roa, Jorge, 2023. "Parental perception of children's privacy in smart toys in countries of different economic levels," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Byaro, Mwoya & Rwezaula, Anicet & Ngowi, Nicholaus, 2023. "Does internet use and adoption matter for better health outcomes in sub-Saharan African countries? New evidence from panel quantile regression," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Rose Calixte & Sumaiya Islam & Zainab Toteh Osakwe & Argelis Rivera & Marlene Camacho-Rivera, 2021. "Pattern of Use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) among the Chronically Ill: A Health Information National Trend Survey (HINTS) Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning & Ren, Siyu & Xu, Lu & Chai, Jingxia & Irfan, Muhammad & Hao, Yu & Lu, Zhi-Nan, 2022. "The impact of internet development on the health of Chinese residents: Transmission mechanisms and empirical tests," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Jiaxin Chen & Ting Li & Hua You & Jingyu Wang & Xueqing Peng & Baoyi Chen, 2023. "Behavioral Interpretation of Willingness to Use Wearable Health Devices in Community Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    10. Maras, Marie-Helen & Miranda, Michelle D., 2023. "Augmented body surveillance: Human microchip implantations and the omnipresent threat of function creep," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.