IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v72y2023ics0160791x22003141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital agency of vulnerable people as experienced by rehabilitation professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Silvennoinen, Piia
  • Rantanen, Teemu

Abstract

The continued spread of digital technology and the digitalization of public services influence the human agency of individuals by requiring new ways and forms of action. In this article, we describe the digital inclusion and digital agency of people belonging to vulnerable groups, based on focus group interviews of rehabilitation professionals working with the target groups. The theory-driven content analysis of six focus groups consisting of a total of 26 interviewees is based on (Jyrkämä, 2008) [1] framework of modality-based agency. The results highlight that the digital agency of the clients belonging to the vulnerable groups is constructed in shared actions with the rehabilitation professionals. The rehabilitation setting creates an agentic space that enables the clients to act in the digital world. The study contributes to the discussion of the digital inclusion and exclusion of vulnerable groups. In a digitalizing society, the digital agency of the people belonging to vulnerable groups should be acknowledged and addressed in policy practices, as well as in designing and providing digital services. Particularly, given that agency has been mainly studied from a personal point of view, in this respect the current study adds a new dimension to the studies on agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvennoinen, Piia & Rantanen, Teemu, 2023. "Digital agency of vulnerable people as experienced by rehabilitation professionals," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003141
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22003141
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teemu Rantanen & Eeva Järveläinen & Teppo Leppälahti, 2021. "Prisoners as Users of Digital Health Care and Social Welfare Services: A Finnish Attitude Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Hyde, Abbey & Howlett, Etaoine & Brady, Dympna & Drennan, Jonathan, 2005. "The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2588-2599, December.
    3. Grošelj, Darja & Reisdorf, Bianca C. & Petrovčič, Andraž, 2019. "Obtaining indirect internet access: An examination how reasons for internet non-use relate to proxy internet use," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 213-224.
    4. Safarov, Nuriiar, 2021. "Personal experiences of digital public services access and use: Older migrants’ digital choices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalpokiene, Julija & Kalpokas, Ignas, 2023. "Creative encounters of a posthuman kind – anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Shiwangi & Sharma, Meenakshi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2021. "Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Kim, Miyea & Oh, Joohyun & Kim, Beomsoo, 2021. "Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Aventin, Áine & Lohan, Maria & O’Halloran, Peter & Henderson, Marion, 2015. "Design and development of a film-based intervention about teenage men and unintended pregnancy: Applying the Medical Research Council framework in practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 19-30.
    4. Elena Fernández-Díaz & Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado & Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez & Carlos las Heras-Pedrosa, 2023. "Web accessibility in Spanish city councils: a challenge for the democratic inclusion and well-being of citizens," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Ryan D. Talbert & Emma D. Macy, 2022. "Former Incarceration, Time Served, and Perceived Oral Health among African American Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, October.
    6. MacLean, Alice & Sweeting, Helen & Hunt, Kate, 2010. "'Rules' for boys, 'guidelines' for girls: Gender differences in symptom reporting during childhood and adolescence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 597-604, February.
    7. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    8. Hussein Haruna & Xiao Hu & Samuel Kai Wah Chu & Robin R. Mellecker & Goodluck Gabriel & Patrick Siril Ndekao, 2018. "Improving Sexual Health Education Programs for Adolescent Students through Game-Based Learning and Gamification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Eunyoung Kim & Eunkyoung Hwang, 2017. "Analysis of the Current Scoring Distribution by Evaluation Criteria in Korean Long-Life Housing Certification System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Zhang, Yi & Kimathi, Flora A., 2022. "Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Edwin van Teijlingen & Jennifer Reid & Janet Shucksmith & Fiona Harris & Kate Philip & Mari Imamura & Janet Tucker & Gillian Penney, 2007. "Embarrassment as a Key Emotion in Young People Talking about Sexual Health," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Zeng, Michael A. & Koller, Hans & Jahn, Reimo, 2019. "Open radar groups: The integration of online communities into open foresight processes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 204-217.
    13. Jelena Zelenović & Vera Zelenović, 2022. "Managing Consumers and Employees through Digital Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Jude Mikal & Kathryn Grace & Jack DeWaard & Molly Brown & Gabriel Sangli, 2020. "Domestic migration and mobile phones: A qualitative case study focused on recent migrants to Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Julius Sim & Jackie Waterfield, 2019. "Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 3003-3022, November.
    16. Isabelle Brault & Kelley Kilpatrick & Danielle D’Amour & Damien Contandriopoulos & Véronique Chouinard & Carl-Ardy Dubois & Mélanie Perroux & Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, 2014. "Role Clarification Processes for Better Integration of Nurse Practitioners into Primary Healthcare Teams: A Multiple-Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.