IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v68y2022ics0160791x22000380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time pacing of product development: The influence of goal clarity and autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Yan
  • Zou, Bo
  • Guo, Jinyu
  • Ji, Peinan

Abstract

Although previous research has speculated that successful new product development processes are always time-paced, the execution of time pacing is difficult. In multigenerational product development, the development cycle of an entire product line is long and highly uncertain. Therefore, we explore how to ensure that product development moves along time pacing as viewed from the inner workings of the organization. Our research examines the relationship between minimal structures and the time pacing of product development. The results show that both the relative autonomy dimension and the interactive dimension of minimal structures have positive effects on the time pacing of product development. Furthermore, our study also shows a positive relationship between time pacing and multigenerational product development performance. We performed an empirical study and tested our hypotheses using data on Chinese firms. Our research contributes to the research of paradox management, time pacing, and multigenerational products.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Yan & Zou, Bo & Guo, Jinyu & Ji, Peinan, 2022. "Time pacing of product development: The influence of goal clarity and autonomy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000380
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22000380
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deepti Aggrawal & Ompal Singh & Adarsh Anand & Mohini Agarwal, 2014. "Optimal Introduction Timing Policy for a Successive Generational Product," International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Dougherty, Deborah & Bertels, Heidi & Chung, Ken & Dunne, Danielle D. & Kraemer, Justin, 2013. "Whose Time Is It? Understanding Clock-time Pacing and Event-time Pacing in Complex Innovations," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 233-263, July.
    3. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    4. Hernes, Tor & Simpson, Barbara & Söderlund, Jonas, 2013. "Managing and temporality," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-6.
    5. Temel, Serdal & Dabić, Marina & Murat Ar, Ilker & Howells, Jeremy & Ali Mert, & Yesilay, Rustem Baris, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between university innovation intermediaries and patenting performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Dougherty, Deborah & Bertels, Heidi & Chung, Ken & Dunne, Danielle D. & Kraemer, Justin, 2013. "Whose Time Is It? Understanding Clock-time Pacing and Event-time Pacing in Complex Innovations," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, pages 233-264.
    7. Xu, Luyun & Zeng, Deming, 2021. "When does the diverse partnership of R&D alliances promote new product development? The contingent effect of the knowledge base," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Gerardo A. Okhuysen & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2002. "Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 370-386, August.
    9. Ferreras-Méndez, José Luis & Fernández-Mesa, Anabel & Alegre, Joaquín, 2016. "The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 48-61.
    10. Barham, Husam & Dabic, Marina & Daim, Tugrul & Shifrer, Dara, 2020. "The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Wu, Kuo-Jui & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Lim, Ming K., 2017. "Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 96-107.
    12. Druehl, Cheryl T. & Schmidt, Glen M. & Souza, Gilvan C., 2009. "The optimal pace of product updates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 621-633, January.
    13. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    14. Liao, Shuangqing & Seifert, Ralf W., 2015. "On the optimal frequency of multiple generation product introductions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 805-814.
    15. Souza, Gilvan C., 2004. "Product introduction decisions in a duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 745-757, February.
    16. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    17. Deborah Dougherty & Heidi Bertels & Ken Chung & Danielle D. Dunne & Justin Kraemer, 2013. "Whose Time Is It? Understanding Clock-time Pacing and Event-time Pacing in Complex Innovations. 谁更胜一筹？在复杂创新中理解钟表时间节奏和时间事件节奏," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 9(2), pages 233-263, July.
    18. Sarah Kaplan & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2013. "Temporal Work in Strategy Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 965-995, August.
    19. Moaniba, Igam M. & Lee, Pei-Chun & Su, Hsin-Ning, 2020. "How does external knowledge sourcing enhance product development? Evidence from drug commercialization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Harvey, Michael & Griffith, David & Novicevic, Milorad, 2000. "Development of `timescapes' to effectively manage global inter-organizational relational communications," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 646-662, December.
    21. Waldman, David A. & Putnam, Linda L. & Miron-Spektor, Ella & Siegel, Donald, 2019. "The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyanka, & Jain, Mahima & Dhir, Sanjay, 2022. "Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Zhao, Lijuan & Wu, Lin, 2023. "How does digital office affect overtime through job autonomy in China? A nonlinear mediating model for the autonomy paradox," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanny Simon & Albéric Tellier, 2016. "Balancing contradictory temporality during the unfold of innovation streams," Post-Print hal-01572302, HAL.
    2. Anne Antoni & Juliane Reinecke & Marianna Fotaki, 2023. "Making Time to Care, and Caring for Time: ‘Tricking Time’ to Cope with Conflicting Temporalities in a Child Protection Agency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 645-663, December.
    3. Borah, Dhruba & Ellwood, Paul, 2022. "The micro-foundations of conflicts in joint university-industry laboratories," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Ebersberger, Bernd & Kuckertz, Andreas, 2021. "Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 126-135.
    5. Liao, Shuangqing & Seifert, Ralf W., 2015. "On the optimal frequency of multiple generation product introductions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 805-814.
    6. Bo Tan & Zhiguo Zhu & Pan Jiang & Xiening Wang, 2023. "Modeling Multi-Generation Product Diffusion in the Context of Dual-Brand Competition and Sustainable Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Mariano, Stefania & Al-Arrayed, Suad, 2018. "Combinations of absorptive capacity metaroutines: The role of organizational disruptions and time constraints," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 171-182.
    8. Gregory Vial, 2023. "A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective of Software Reuse in the Digital Age: An Agenda for IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1728-1743, December.
    9. Bayrak, Busra & Guray, Busra & Uzunlar, Nilsu & Nadar, Emre, 2024. "Diffusion control in closed-loop supply chains: Successive product generations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Saurabh Panwar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 2021. "Predicting diffusion dynamics and launch time strategy for mobile telecommunication services: an empirical analysis," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 33-51, March.
    11. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Nathan R. Furr & Christopher B. Bingham, 2010. "CROSSROADS---Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1263-1273, December.
    12. Brice Dattée & James Barlow, 2017. "Multilevel Organizational Adaptation: Scale Invariance in the Scottish Healthcare System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 301-319, April.
    13. Samuel Nathan Kirshner & Yuri Levin & Mikhail Nediak, 2017. "Product Upgrades with Stochastic Technology Advancement, Product Failure, and Brand Commitment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 742-756, April.
    14. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Lijun & Zeng, Saixing, 2018. "Inter-organizational knowledge acquisition and firms' radical innovation: A moderated mediation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 295-306.
    15. Samuel Sale, R. & Mesak, Hani I. & Inman, R. Anthony, 2017. "A dynamic marketing-operations interface model of new product updates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 233-242.
    16. Nghona, Xolani, 2021. "From one dominant growth mode to another : Switching between strategic expansion modes," Other publications TiSEM 8331633d-0e6f-4cc8-8b22-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Rahman Khorramfar & Osman Y. Özaltın & Karl G. Kempf & Reha Uzsoy, 2022. "Managing Product Transitions: A Bilevel Programming Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2828-2844, September.
    18. Santoro, Gabriele & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Dezi, Luca, 2018. "The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 347-354.
    19. Ly, Kim Cuong & Liu, Hong & Opong, Kwaku, 2017. "Who acquires whom among stand-alone commercial banks and bank holding company affiliates?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 144-158.
    20. Christian Sillaber & Bernhard Waltl & Horst Treiblmaier & Ulrich Gallersdörfer & Michael Felderer, 2021. "Laying the foundation for smart contract development: an integrated engineering process model," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 863-882, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.