IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v64y2021ics0160791x20312690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a roadmap for the moral programming of smart technology

Author

Listed:
  • Wernaart, Bart

Abstract

Smart technology is increasingly integrated in our ethical decision making. This raises questions as to how we should morally program technology. Deciding on moral programming depends on the moral intensity of the ethical issue. A moral intensity dashboard for engineers can help allocate the most suitable moral authority for a particular moral programming. Technology is not capable of ‘doing’ ethics the way humans do. This leaves forms of consequentialism and deontology as the most reasonable programming alternatives, using deontic logic as a starting point. Furthermore, it is very likely that in the more complicated settings, technology should have elements of meta ethics in its moral programming to adequately deal with scenarios that lead to conflicts in moral programming. We propose to use the calculation methods that stem from a comparative approach or the Expected Moral Value approach. All this has considerable consequences in how we should see moral programming in technology-driven ethical decision-making processes. We will therefore propose a roadmap for the moral programming of smart technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Wernaart, Bart, 2021. "Developing a roadmap for the moral programming of smart technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:64:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x20312690
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X20312690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & Jörg Henseler & Carsten Gelhard & Aleš Popovič, 2016. "Introducing new products that affect consumer privacy: A mediation model," Post-Print hal-02156711, HAL.
    2. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & Jörg Henseler & Carsten Gelhard & Aleš Popovič, 2016. "Introducing new products that affect consumer privacy: A mediation model," Post-Print hal-01528464, HAL.
    3. Geert Demuijnck, 2015. "Universal Values and Virtues in Management Versus Cross-Cultural Moral Relativism: An Educational Strategy to Clear the Ground for Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(4), pages 817-835, June.
    4. Jana Craft, 2013. "A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 221-259, October.
    5. Werhane, Patricia H., 1998. "Moral Imagination and the Search for Ethical Decision-Making in Management," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(S1), pages 75-98, January.
    6. Joan McMahon & Robert Harvey, 2007. "The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 335-357, June.
    7. Sousa, Maria José & Rocha, Álvaro, 2019. "Skills for disruptive digital business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 257-263.
    8. Wright, Scott A. & Schultz, Ainslie E., 2018. "The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 823-832.
    9. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    10. Martínez-Córcoles, Mario & Teichmann, Mare & Murdvee, Mart, 2017. "Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 183-188.
    11. Miltgen, Caroline Lancelot & Henseler, Jörg & Gelhard, Carsten & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "Introducing new products that affect consumer privacy: A mediation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4659-4666.
    12. Yi-Ming Yu, 2015. "Comparative Analysis of Jones’ and Kelley’s Ethical Decision-Making Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 573-583, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotrowski Dariusz, 2023. "Privacy frontiers in customers’ relations with banks," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 119-141, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2019. "Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 289-304, March.
    2. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    3. Mwesiumo, Deodat & Halpern, Nigel & Budd, Thomas & Suau-Sanchez, Pere & Bråthen, Svein, 2021. "An exploratory and confirmatory composite analysis of a scale for measuring privacy concerns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-75.
    4. Niousha Shahidi & Silvia Cacho-Elizondo & Vesselina Tossan, 2021. "Cross-Cultural Effects in Adoption Patterns of a Mobile Coaching Service for Studies : A Comparison Between France and Mexico," Post-Print hal-03233537, HAL.
    5. Slepchuk, Alec N. & Milne, George R. & Swani, Kunal, 2022. "Overcoming privacy concerns in consumers’ use of health information technologies: A justice framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 782-793.
    6. Zheng Shen & Armida de la Garza, 2019. "Developing a Digital Artifact for the Sustainable Presentation of Marketing Research Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Martin, Kirsten, 2018. "The penalty for privacy violations: How privacy violations impact trust online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 103-116.
    8. Del Bucchia, Céline & Lancelot Miltgen, Caroline & Russell, Cristel Antonia & Burlat, Claire, 2021. "Empowerment as latent vulnerability in techno-mediated consumption journeys," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 629-651.
    9. Dominique Carry & Valérie-Inès de La Ville, 2021. "Process of adopting a personal data portability service: highlighting the ambiguity perceived by young users [Processus d’adoption d’un service de portabilité des données personnelles : mise en lum," Post-Print hal-03328025, HAL.
    10. Ying, Shiyi & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Song, Jinzhu, 2023. "Privacy paradox for location tracking in mobile social networking apps: The perspectives of behavioral reasoning and regulatory focus," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Fehrenbach, David & Herrando, Carolina, 2021. "The effect of customer-perceived value when paying for a product with personal data: A real-life experimental study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 222-232.
    12. Pantano, Eleonora & Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele & Dennis, Charles, 2020. "Competing during a pandemic? Retailers’ ups and downs during the COVID-19 outbreak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 209-213.
    13. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele, 2020. "Privacy threats with retail technologies: A consumer perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Sankay Oboh, Collins, 2020. "The Influence Of Perceived System Of Justice, Magnitude Of Consequences And Social Consensus On Ethical Decision-Making Among Professional Accountants In Nigeria," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 9(2), pages 46-73, September.
    15. Marli Gonan Božac & Katarina Kostelić & Morena Paulišić & Charles G. Smith, 2021. "Business Ethics Decision-Making: Examining Partial Reflective Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Rachel Fichter, 2018. "Do the Right Thing! Developing Ethical Behavior in Financial Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 69-84, August.
    17. Brian Whitaker & Lindsey Godwin, 2013. "The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 61-73, April.
    18. Gentina, Elodie & Huarng, Kun-Huang & Sakashita, Mototaka, 2018. "A social comparison theory approach to mothers' and daughters' clothing co-consumption behaviors: A cross-cultural study in France and Japan," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 361-370.
    19. Valentine, Sean & Godkin, Lynn, 2019. "Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 277-288.
    20. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Hassan, Rohail & Escobar, Octavio, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 283-314.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:64:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x20312690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.