IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v62y2020ics0160791x19300119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Versioning products and services by downsizing digital components: Risks due to consumers' feelings of unfairness

Author

Listed:
  • De Sordi, José Osvaldo
  • Meireles, Manuel
  • Bitencourt Jorge, Carlos Francisco
  • Rigato, Carlos
  • Oliveira, Osvaldo Luiz de

Abstract

The inclusion of digital components in products and services, a characteristic of Industry 4.0, increases the possibility of adopting a versioning strategy by downsizing through the reduction or degradation of these components. In this study, we explore the perception of fairness of consumers who are already customers of a company regarding four different downsizing strategies in order to discuss means of identifying and avoiding those that are sources of feelings of unfairness. To address consumers' perception levels of fairness we worked with a scenario-based experiment approach, involving the analysis of different strategies of versioning through downsizing. The results indicate that the two downsizing strategies associated with degradation are sources of potential feelings of unfairness among consumers, implying a risk of the organization losing customers and revenue. From this observation, the difficulties of identifying and managing downsizing through degradation only from a technological perspective are discussed. Therefore, the study provides evidence of the importance of working on organizational behavior and culture to raise awareness in the areas involved in the development of products and services concerning the risks of downsizing through degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • De Sordi, José Osvaldo & Meireles, Manuel & Bitencourt Jorge, Carlos Francisco & Rigato, Carlos & Oliveira, Osvaldo Luiz de, 2020. "Versioning products and services by downsizing digital components: Risks due to consumers' feelings of unfairness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19300119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X19300119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard H. Thaler, 2008. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 15-25, 01-02.
    2. Ying-Ju Chen & Sridhar Seshadri, 2007. "Product Development and Pricing Strategy for Information Goods Under Heterogeneous Outside Opportunities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 150-172, June.
    3. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    4. David A. Asch & Jonathan Baron & John C. Hershey & Howard Kunreuther & Jacqueline Meszaros & Ilana Ritov & Mark Spranca, 1994. "Omission Bias and Pertussis Vaccination," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(2), pages 118-123, April.
    5. Trevino, Linda Klebe, 1992. "Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 121-136, April.
    6. Andrew D. Gershoff & Ran Kivetz & Anat Keinan, 2012. "Consumer Response to Versioning: How Brands' Production Methods Affect Perceptions of Unfairness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 382-398.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    2. Rabin, Matthew, 1993. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1281-1302, December.
    3. Luiz Antonio Slongo & Carlos Sérgio Valdez Saldanha & Syed H. Akhter, 2014. "Low-Income Consumers in Brazil: Nuances of a Market That Can No Longer Be Ignored," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 4(10), pages 485-505.
    4. Paul, Maureen, 2006. "A cross-section analysis of the fairness-of-pay perception of UK employees," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 243-267, April.
    5. Azar, Ofer H., 2014. "Optimal strategy of multi-product retailers with relative thinking and reference prices," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 130-140.
    6. Xia, Lan & Monroe, Kent B., 2010. "Is a good deal always fair? Examining the concepts of transaction value and price fairness," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 884-894, December.
    7. Shivendu Shivendu & Zhe (James) Zhang, 2015. "Versioning in the Software Industry: Heterogeneous Disutility from Underprovisioning of Functionality," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 731-753, December.
    8. Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2018. "Pricing in Competitive Search Markets: The Roles of Price Information and Fairness Perceptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1101-1120, March.
    9. Mark J Hurlstone & Stephan Lewandowsky & Ben R Newell & Brittany Sewell, 2014. "The Effect of Framing and Normative Messages in Building Support for Climate Policies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Mehmet Karacuka & Asad Zaman, 2012. "The empirical evidence against neoclassical utility theory: a review of the literature," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 366-414.
    11. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    12. Matthew Selove, 2019. "Dynamic pricing with fairness concerns and a capacity constraint," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 385-413, December.
    13. Gielissen, R. & Dutilh, C.E. & Graafland, J.J., 2008. "Perceptions of price fairness: An empirical research," MPRA Paper 20275, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jack L. Knetsch, 1995. "Assumptions, behavioral findings, and policy analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 68-78.
    15. Janina Garbas & Sebastian Schubach & Martin Mende & Maura L. Scott & Jan H. Schumann, 2023. "You want to sell this to me twice!? How perceptions of betrayal may undermine internal product upgrades," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 286-309, March.
    16. Marco Bertini & Stefan Buehler & Daniel Halbheer, 2020. "Pricing and Supply Chain Transparency to Conscientious Consumers," CESifo Working Paper Series 8675, CESifo.
    17. Marco Bertini & Luc Wathieu, 2008. "Research Note—Attention Arousal Through Price Partitioning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 236-246, 03-04.
    18. Azar, Ofer H., 2009. "Do consumers make too much effort to save on cheap items and too little to save on expensive items? experimental results and implications for business strategy," MPRA Paper 20962, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Nguyen, Bang & Klaus, Philipp “Philâ€, 2013. "Retail fairness: Exploring consumer perceptions of fairness towards retailers’ marketing tactics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 311-324.
    20. Bhavya Mohan & Ryan W. Buell & Leslie K. John, 2020. "Lifting the Veil: The Benefits of Cost Transparency," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1105-1121, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19300119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.