IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v196y2023ics0040162523005553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Luxury in female technology (FemTech): Selection of smart jewelry for women through BCM-MARCOS group decision-making framework with fuzzy ZE-numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Haseli, Gholamreza
  • Yaran Ögel, İlkin
  • Ecer, Fatih
  • Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa

Abstract

As an extension of wearable technology devices, smart jewelry has grasped the attention of women looking for both stylish and smart devices. Though smart jewelry is designed for women desiring to use wearable technologies without sacrificing their style, extant studies on smart jewelry lack a women-centered approach. Moreover, in the face of accelerated race in the launch of new smart jewelry in the marketplace, current approaches in the relevant literature on determining key evaluation criteria regarding smart jewelry and selecting the best alternative for women remain incapable. In this research, therefore, three main criteria, including jewelry-related, technology-related, and producer-related criteria, are initially determined, and seventeen sub-criteria are identified based on a review of relevant literature and experts~ opinions and knowledge. Then, four smart jewelry alternatives, including Bellabeat-Ivy Health Tracker, Totwoo We Bloom Smart Bracelet, Ringly Luxe Smart Bracelet, and Ringly Go Smart Bracelet, are chosen for analysis due to their technology and aesthetic design. Unlike prevailing studies, this study adopts the base-criterion method (BCM) and measurement of alternatives and ranking according to the compromise solution (MARCOS) with fuzzy ZE-numbers. The findings reveal that technology-related criteria are the most prioritized criteria by women. Further, activity tracking, price, and mobile alert are the first three critical sub-criteria in smart jewelry preference. Based on the overall evaluation, Ringly Luxe Smart Bracelet is the best smart jewelry for women. This research strongly contributes to extant literature as follows: (i) It provides a practical contribution to women in their smart jewelry selection processes and guides industrial practitioners, including smart jewelry designers and producers, in their design of smart jewelries that better satisfies the technological and aesthetic needs of women, and (ii) in terms of methodology, the proposed framework allows for the consideration of the degree of reliability of two different groups of decision-makers and experts for the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Haseli, Gholamreza & Yaran Ögel, İlkin & Ecer, Fatih & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2023. "Luxury in female technology (FemTech): Selection of smart jewelry for women through BCM-MARCOS group decision-making framework with fuzzy ZE-numbers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:196:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523005553
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523005553
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing Li & Zhebin Xue & Yuhan Wu & Xianyi Zeng, 2022. "The Status Quo and Prospect of Sustainable Development of Smart Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Elnaz Osgooei & Gholamreza Haseli & Hana Tomaskova, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Solve Fully Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems with Modified Triangular Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    4. Magni, Domitilla & Scuotto, Veronica & Pezzi, Alberto & Giudice, Manlio Del, 2021. "Employees’ acceptance of wearable devices: Towards a predictive model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Huan-Ming Chuang & Chien-I Chen, 2022. "Sustaining the Well-Being of Wearable Technology Users: Leveraging SEM-Based IPMA and VIKOR Analyses to Gain Deeper Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Nisreen Ameen & Ali Tarhini & Alexander Reppel & Amitabh Anand, 2021. "Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence," Post-Print halshs-03045430, HAL.
    7. Mele, Cristina & Tuominen, Tiina & Edvardsson, Bo & Reynoso, Javier, 2023. "Smart sensing technology and self-adjustment in service systems through value co-creation routine dynamics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Prodi, Elena & Tassinari, Mattia & Ferrannini, Andrea & Rubini, Lauretta, 2022. "Industry 4.0 policy from a sociotechnical perspective: The case of German competence centres," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Nieroda, Marzena E. & Mrad, Mona & Solomon, Michael R., 2018. "How do consumers think about hybrid products? Computer wearables have an identity problem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 159-170.
    11. Ecer, Fatih, 2021. "A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Dragan S. Pamucar & Snezana Pejcic Tarle & Tanja Parezanovic, 2018. "New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1641-1665, January.
    13. Miomir Stanković & Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Marko Subotić & Dragan Pamučar, 2020. "A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Kiran Bisht & Arun Kumar, 2022. "Stock Portfolio Selection Hybridizing Fuzzy Base-Criterion Method and Evidence Theory in Triangular Fuzzy Environment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-32, December.
    15. Mališa Žižović & Dragan Pamučar & Miloljub Albijanić & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ivan Pribićević, 2020. "Eliminating Rank Reversal Problem Using a New Multi-Attribute Model—The RAFSI Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Snežana Tadić & Violeta Roso, 2022. "Applicability of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Reverse Logistics: A Circular Economy Approach Based on COmprehensive Distance Based RAnking (COBRA) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.
    5. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    6. Kai Wang & Zhe Wang & Jun Deng & Yuanyuan Feng & Quanfang Li, 2022. "Study on the Evaluation of Emergency Management Capacity of Resilient Communities by the AHP-TOPSIS Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Mališa Žižović & Dragan Pamučar & Goran Ćirović & Miodrag M. Žižović & Boža D. Miljković, 2020. "A Model for Determining Weight Coefficients by Forming a Non-Decreasing Series at Criteria Significance Levels (NDSL)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Jiaji Pan & Ruilin Fan & Hanlu Zhang & Yi Gao & Zhiquan Shu & Zhongxiang Chen, 2022. "Investigating the Effectiveness of Government Public Health Systems against COVID-19 by Hybrid MCDM Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Witold Torbacki, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Mobility in the Szczecin Metropolitan Area in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The DEMATEL and PROMETHEE II Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Ali Sibevei & Pardis Roozkhosh, 2024. "Prioritizing Barriers to Resilience in Blood Supply Chains: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-37, June.
    11. Roy, Sanjit K. & Singh, Gaganpreet & Sadeque, Saalem & Gruner, Richard L., 2024. "Customer experience quality with social robots: Does trust matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Muhammet Deveci & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Ilgin Gokasar & Rumeysa Tuna Deveci, 2023. "Prioritization of healthcare systems during pandemics using Cronbach’s measure based fuzzy WASPAS approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 279-307, September.
    13. Tanrıverdi, Gökhan & Ecer, Fatih & Durak, Mehmet Şahin, 2022. "Exploring factors affecting airport selection during the COVID-19 pandemic from air cargo carriers’ perspective through the triangular fuzzy Dombi-Bonferroni BWM methodology," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    14. Victor Rosemberg Reis Mota & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Diogo Ferreira Lima Silva & Marcos Santos, 2024. "The novel hybrid multiple criteria decision method BWM-Moora-N applied for investment funds prioritization," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-43, September.
    15. Yazdani, Morteza & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Chatterjee, Prasenjit & Fallahpour, Alireza & Montero-Simo, Maria Jose & Araque-Padilla, Rafael A. & Wong, Kuan Yew, 2022. "A fuzzy group decision-making model to measure resiliency in a food supply chain: A case study in Spain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    16. Ecer, Fatih & Pamucar, Dragan, 2022. "A novel LOPCOW‐DOBI multi‐criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    18. Shojaei, Payam & Seyed Haeri, Seyed Amin & Mohammadi, Sahar, 2018. "Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 4-13.
    19. Xunqian Xu & Siwen Wang & Fengyi Kang & Shue Li & Qi Li & Tao Wu, 2024. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method in Preventive Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Based on Optimized Triangular Fuzzy Number," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Afrasiabi, Ahmadreza & Chalmardi, Mazyar Kaboli & Balezentis, Tomas, 2022. "A novel hybrid evaluation framework for public organizations based on employees’ performance factors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:196:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523005553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.