IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v3y2022i4d10.1007_s43069-022-00167-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Portfolio Selection Hybridizing Fuzzy Base-Criterion Method and Evidence Theory in Triangular Fuzzy Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Kiran Bisht

    (G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology)

  • Arun Kumar

    (G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology)

Abstract

In this paper, an integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework is developed for portfolio construction by unifying the assessments of a novice investor and stock market expert. This paper aims to simplify the stock selection process for inexperienced investors with limited understanding. The critical factors of portfolio construction have been selected based on novice investor’s knowledge and domain expert’s extensive analysis. The weights of the stock selection criterion are determined using the fuzzy Base-Criterion method. The Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is used to collect and combine evidence to categorize securities as “good for investment,” “average for investment,” or “bad for investment.” The securities are ranked based on the consensus decision of both decision-makers. A portfolio of ten top-ranked securities is formed. The Sharpe ratio is optimized using a deep recurrent neural network with long-short-term memory (LSTM) to obtain optimal ratio allocations of stocks in the portfolio. The proposed model is applied for investment in the National Stock Exchange of India. The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by sensitivity and comparative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiran Bisht & Arun Kumar, 2022. "Stock Portfolio Selection Hybridizing Fuzzy Base-Criterion Method and Evidence Theory in Triangular Fuzzy Environment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00167-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-022-00167-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-022-00167-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-022-00167-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehrgott, Matthias & Klamroth, Kathrin & Schwehm, Christian, 2004. "An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 752-770, June.
    2. Xidonas, Panagiotis & Mavrotas, George & Zopounidis, Constantin & Psarras, John, 2011. "IPSSIS: An integrated multicriteria decision support system for equity portfolio construction and selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 398-409, April.
    3. Jaydip Sen & Abhishek Dutta & Sidra Mehtab, 2021. "Stock Portfolio Optimization Using a Deep Learning LSTM Model," Papers 2111.04709, arXiv.org.
    4. Clara Calvo & Carlos Ivorra & Vicente Liern, 2015. "Soft Computing Techniques for Portfolio Selection: Combining SRI with Mean-Variance Goals," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Enrique Ballestero & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Ana Garcia-Bernabeu (ed.), Socially Responsible Investment, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 283-301, Springer.
    5. Rania Azmi & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "A Review of Goal Programming for Portfolio Selection," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz & Jana Ries (ed.), New Developments in Multiple Objective and Goal Programming, pages 15-33, Springer.
    6. Panagiotis Xidonas & John Psarras, 2009. "Equity portfolio management within the MCDM frame: a literature review," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 285-309.
    7. Seung-Hyun Moon & Yourim Yoon, 2022. "Genetic Mean Reversion Strategy for Online Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Palash Dutta, 2015. "Uncertainty Modeling in Risk Assessment Based on Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence with Generalized Fuzzy Focal Elements," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 15-30, March.
    9. Belaid Aouni & Michalis Doumpos & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Ralph E. Steuer, 2018. "On the increasing importance of multiple criteria decision aid methods for portfolio selection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(10), pages 1525-1542, October.
    10. Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2014. "Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Qin, Zhongfeng, 2015. "Mean-variance model for portfolio optimization problem in the simultaneous presence of random and uncertain returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 480-488.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haseli, Gholamreza & Yaran Ögel, İlkin & Ecer, Fatih & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2023. "Luxury in female technology (FemTech): Selection of smart jewelry for women through BCM-MARCOS group decision-making framework with fuzzy ZE-numbers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin Zopounidis & Michael Doumpos, 2013. "Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 241-261, July.
    2. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.
    3. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Tamiz, Mehrdad & Azmi, Rania A. & Jones, Dylan F., 2013. "On selecting portfolio of international mutual funds using goal programming with extended factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 560-576.
    5. Jaime Alberto Vásquez & John Willmer Escobar & Diego Fernando Manotas, 2021. "AHP–TOPSIS Methodology for Stock Portfolio Investments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Florian Methling & Rüdiger Nitzsch, 2020. "Tailor-made thematic portfolios: a core satellite optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 317-331, February.
    7. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    8. Yue Qi & Ralph E. Steuer, 2020. "On the analytical derivation of efficient sets in quad-and-higher criterion portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 521-538, October.
    9. Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen Emamat & Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota & Mohammad Reza Mehregan & Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam & Philippe Nemery, 2022. "Using ELECTRE-TRI and FlowSort methods in a stock portfolio selection context," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Panos Xidonas & Ilias Lekkos & Charis Giannakidis & Christos Staikouras, 2023. "Multicriteria security evaluation: does it cost to be traditional?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 301-330, April.
    11. Sandra Caçador & Joana Matos Dias & Pedro Godinho, 2020. "Global minimum variance portfolios under uncertainty: a robust optimization approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 267-293, February.
    12. Chen, Yu-Wang & Poon, Ser-Huang & Yang, Jian-Bo & Xu, Dong-Ling & Zhang, Dongxu & Acomb, Simon, 2012. "Belief rule-based system for portfolio optimisation with nonlinear cash-flows and constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 775-784.
    13. P Xidonas & G Mavrotas & J Psarras, 2010. "A multiple criteria decision-making approach for the selection of stocks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(8), pages 1273-1287, August.
    14. Yue Qi, 2022. "Classifying the minimum-variance surface of multiple-objective portfolio selection for capital asset pricing models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1203-1227, April.
    15. Meryem Masmoudi & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz, 2018. "Portfolio selection problem: a review of deterministic and stochastic multiple objective programming models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 335-352, August.
    16. Antonios Georgantas & Michalis Doumpos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2024. "Robust optimization approaches for portfolio selection: a comparative analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1205-1221, August.
    17. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    18. Panagiotis Xidonas & George Mavrotas & John Psarras, 2010. "Equity portfolio construction and selection using multiobjective mathematical programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 185-209, June.
    19. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.
    20. Rastegar, Narges & Khorram, Esmaile, 2014. "A combined scalarizing method for multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 229-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00167-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.