IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v179y2022ics0040162522001810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The show must go on: Why Korea lost its first-mover advantage in Esports and how it can become a major player again

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hyung-Min
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

Korea was once a first mover in the field of esports and could have been the top esports powerhouse due to its unrivaled information and communications technology infrastructure and cultural base in esports. However, Korea now lags behind late movers in the field. China is striving to dominate the industry by replicating Korea's primary strategies, and U.S. game developers are strengthening their control of intellectual properties (IPs). This study reviewed the decline of Korea's esports industry in the global market and proposed measures that could revive it. We employed a qualitative method using relevant literature, secondary data from industry reports and government publications, and expert interviews. To this end, we applied first-mover advantages and late-mover advantages as a theoretical lens. The findings of this study suggest that owning solid IP resources will guarantee the scalability of the esports business. Recovering platform sovereignty is the main agenda for Korea as it maintains and supports the esports industry. Furthermore, educational support for career development is necessary as the esports industry expands. Therefore, systemic approaches from three different stakeholders (i.e., industry, government, and academia) are required to restore Korea's leadership in the esports industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hyung-Min & Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "The show must go on: Why Korea lost its first-mover advantage in Esports and how it can become a major player again," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:179:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522001810
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522001810
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. , Yangriani, 2021. "Digital Employee Experience," OSF Preprints 76df9, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    3. Demary, Vera & Plünnecke, Axel & Schaefer, Thilo, 2021. "Dekarbonisierung: Digitale Fachkräfte gesucht," IW-Kurzberichte 51/2021, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Harold James & Jean-Pierre Landau, 2019. "The Digitalization of Money," Working Papers 2019-13, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    5. Miller, Alex & Gartner, William B. & Wilson, Robert, 1989. "Entry order, market share, and competitive advantage: A study of their relationships in new corporate ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 197-209, May.
    6. Tobias M. Scholz, 2019. "eSports is Business," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-11199-1, January.
    7. Yupei Zhao & Zhongxuan Lin, 2021. "Umbrella platform of Tencent eSports industry in China," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 9-25, January.
    8. Masduki, 2021. "Media Control in the Digital Politics of Indonesia," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 52-61.
    9. Marvin B. Lieberman & David B. Montgomery, 1988. "First‐mover advantages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(S1), pages 41-58, June.
    10. Wil M. P. Aalst & Oliver Hinz & Christof Weinhardt, 2021. "Resilient Digital Twins," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(6), pages 615-619, December.
    11. Catherine M. Banbury & Will Mitchell, 1995. "The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(S1), pages 161-182.
    12. Michael G. Jacobides & Carmelo Cennamo & Annabelle Gawer, 2018. "Towards a theory of ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 2255-2276, August.
    13. Kok Choon Tay & Calvin M. L. Chan, 2021. "Digital Transformation of Banks: The Case of DBS," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: David Kuo Chuen Lee & Ding Ding & Chong Guan (ed.), Financial Management in the Digital Economy, chapter 8, pages 141-161, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    14. , Michelle, 2021. "Digital Platforms Utilization for MSMEs Growth," OSF Preprints uj83w, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Fouquet & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "Twin Transitions of Decarbonisation and Digitalisation: A Historical Perspective on Energy and Information in European Economies," Working Papers 08-22, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    2. Blind, Knut & Niebel, Crispin, 2022. "5G roll-out failures addressed by innovation policies in the EU," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Barzegar, Maryam & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2021. "A framework for spatial analysis in 3D urban land administration – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Choung, Youngjoo & Chatterjee, Swarn & Pak, Tae-Young, 2023. "Digital Financial Literacy and Financial Well-Being," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Journal P, pages 1-1.
    5. Abate, Gashaw T. & Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Kassim, Yumna & Spielman, David J. & Paul Jr Tabe-Ojong, Martin, 2023. "Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Baboo, Shabanaz & Nunkoo, Robin & Kock, Florian, 2022. "Social media attachment: Conceptualization and formative index construction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 437-447.
    7. Kanjina, Sukit, 2021. "Farmers' Use of Social Media and its Implications for Agricultural Extension: Evidence from Thailand," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 11(04), January.
    8. Ferilli, Greta Benedetta & Palmieri, Egidio & Miani, Stefano & Stefanelli, Valeria, 2024. "The impact of FinTech innovation on digital financial literacy in Europe: Insights from the banking industry," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Bejjani, Melissa & Göcke, Lutz & Menter, Matthias, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Kropp, Per & Theuer, Stefan & Fritzsche, Birgit, 2021. "Digitalisierung schreitet voran – Neuschätzung der Substituierbarkeitspotenziale in Thüringen 2019," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Sachsen-Anhalt-Thüringen 202104, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Enright, Christina, 2000. "Strategic Behaviour of Internet Service Providers in New Zealand and the Performance of this Market," Working Paper Series 19013, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    12. Brett W. Cantrell & Victoria Dickinson, 2020. "Conditional Life Cycle: An Examination of Operating Performance for Leaders and Laggards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 433-451, January.
    13. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19013 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Fernandes, Cristina & Ferreira, João J. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Kraus, Sascha & Dabić, Marina, 2022. "Digital entrepreneurship platforms: Mapping the field and looking towards a holistic approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Kropp, Per & Theuer, Stefan & Fritzsche, Birgit, 2021. "Digitalisierung schreitet voran - Neuschätzung der Substituierbarkeitspotenziale in Sachsen-Anhalt 2019," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Sachsen-Anhalt-Thüringen 202103, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Timothy King & Dimitrios Koutmos & Francesco Saverio Stentella Lopes, 2021. "Cryptocurrency Mining Protocols: A Regulatory and Technological Overview," Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology, in: Timothy King & Francesco Saverio Stentella Lopes & Abhishek Srivastav & Jonathan Williams (ed.), Disruptive Technology in Banking and Finance, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 93-134, Palgrave Macmillan.
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Laura-Diana Radu, 2012. "Technological Innovation Management and its Role in Performance of Organizations," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 95-103, October.
    19. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    21. Amelio, Andrea & Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane & Valletti, Tommaso, 2020. "Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:179:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522001810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.