IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v143y2019icp101-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How aluminum changed the world: A metallurgical revolution through technological and cultural perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ashkenazi, Dana

Abstract

The history of aluminum is rather short since it was discovered only in the nineteenth century, yet it has become an important part of everyday life. This article reviews the history of aluminum through technological breakthroughs as well as from cultural and social perspectives, beginning with its discovery, through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries until today; and aims to suggest possible future trends and applications for aluminum alloys. Aluminum has a high strength-to-weight ratio combined with excellent thermal conductivity and good corrosion resistance. Therefore, aluminum is an attractive material for many applications, including transportation, electrical and packaging industries, architecture, and food industries. It is also a recyclable metal, which provides both environmental and economic advantages. The commercial use of aluminum started at the end of the nineteenth century and continues to grow today with the development of new advanced aluminum alloys. Consequently, from a cultural perspective, aluminum is considered a symbol of modernity. Technological breakthroughs generate economic growth and social benefits. Present applications of aluminum include new choices, such as 3D printing, composite materials, nano-rods, biomedicine devices and aerospace uses. Based on the excellent properties of aluminum, its low price, combined with its significant scrap value and a growing recycling market, as well as its accelerating global production, it is expected that the aluminum industries will considerably grow through the twenty-first century and aluminum will continue to be a major part of our everyday culture. Therefore, based on the increasing growth of aluminum production and consumption, additional research and development effort is needed in the following years to minimize the negative environmental side effects associated with the technological developments related to aluminum production and at the same time creating further technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashkenazi, Dana, 2019. "How aluminum changed the world: A metallurgical revolution through technological and cultural perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 101-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:143:y:2019:i:c:p:101-113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518309375
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Rodrigues Vaz & Tania Regina Shoeninger Rauen & Álvaro Guillermo Rojas Lezana, 2017. "Sustainability and Innovation in the Automotive Sector: A Structured Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Berman, Barry, 2012. "3-D printing: The new industrial revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 155-162.
    3. Li, Munan & Porter, Alan L. & Suominen, Arho, 2018. "Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 285-296.
    4. Elmore, Bartow J., 2012. "The American Beverage Industry and the Development of Curbside Recycling Programs, 1950–2000," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(3), pages 477-501, October.
    5. Andrey Vyatskikh & Stéphane Delalande & Akira Kudo & Xuan Zhang & Carlos M. Portela & Julia R. Greer, 2018. "Additive manufacturing of 3D nano-architected metals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Baumers, Martin & Dickens, Phill & Tuck, Chris & Hague, Richard, 2016. "The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 193-201.
    7. John H. Martin & Brennan D. Yahata & Jacob M. Hundley & Justin A. Mayer & Tobias A. Schaedler & Tresa M. Pollock, 2017. "3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys," Nature, Nature, vol. 549(7672), pages 365-369, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esangbedo, Moses Olabhele & Taiwo, Blessing Olamide & Abbas, Hawraa H. & Hosseini, Shahab & Sazid, Mohammed & Fissha, Yewuhalashet, 2024. "Enhancing the exploitation of natural resources for green energy: An application of LSTM-based meta-model for aluminum prices forecasting," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Yu, Biying & Zhao, Zihao & Zhang, Shuai & An, Runying & Chen, Jingming & Li, Ru & Zhao, Guangpu, 2021. "Technological development pathway for a low-carbon primary aluminum industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. He, Rui-fang & Zhong, Mei-rui & Huang, Jian-bai, 2021. "The dynamic effects of renewable-energy and fossil-fuel technological progress on metal consumption in the electric power industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Shen, Angxing & Zhang, Jihong, 2024. "Technologies for CO2 emission reduction and low-carbon development in primary aluminum industry in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    5. Nathália C. G. Silveira & Maysa L. F. Martins & Augusto C. S. Bezerra & Fernando G. S. Araújo, 2021. "Red Mud from the Aluminium Industry: Production, Characteristics, and Alternative Applications in Construction Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Abbas, Qamar & Hongxing, Yao & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Ramzan, Muhammad & Fatima, Sumbal, 2024. "Metallic minerals production and environmental sustainability in China: Insights using ARDL bounds testing and wavelet coherence approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Zhang, Zhouyi & Song, Yi & Cheng, Jinhua & Zhang, Yijun, 2023. "Effects of heterogeneous ICT on critical metal supply: A differentiated perspective on primary and secondary supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Dokl, Monika & Gomilšek, Rok & Čuček, Lidija & Abikoye, Ben & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2022. "Maximizing the power output and net present value of organic Rankine cycle: Application to aluminium industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Baumers & Luca Beltrametti & Angelo Gasparre & Richard Hague, 2017. "Informing additive manufacturing technology adoption: total cost and the impact of capacity utilisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6957-6970, December.
    2. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    3. Maresch, Daniela & Gartner, Johannes, 2020. "Make disruptive technological change happen - The case of additive manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Rachel Lacroix & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2023. "Utilizing additive manufacturing and mass customization under capacity constraints," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 281-301, January.
    5. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Martin Hannibal, 2020. "The influence of additive manufacturing on early internationalization: considerations into potential avenues of IE research," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 473-491, December.
    7. Lacroix, Rachel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Timonina-Farkas, Anna, 2021. "Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    8. Birtchnell, Thomas & Böhme, Tillmann & Gorkin, Robert, 2017. "3D printing and the third mission: The university in the materialization of intellectual capital," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 240-249.
    9. Binoy Debnath & Md Shihab Shakur & Fahmida Tanjum & M. Azizur Rahman & Ziaul Haq Adnan, 2022. "Impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Supply Chain of Aerospace Spare Parts Industry—A Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Wang, Lili & Jiang, Shan & Zhang, Shiyun, 2020. "Mapping technological trajectories and exploring knowledge sources: A case study of 3D printing technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Jiang, Ruth & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2017. "Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 84-97.
    12. Elham Sharifi & Atanu Chaudhuri & Brian Vejrum Waehrens & Lasse Guldborg Staal & Saeed Davoudabadi Farahani, 2021. "Assessing the Suitability of Freeform Injection Molding for Low Volume Injection Molded Parts: A Design Science Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Yeh, Ching-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 209-216.
    14. Naghshineh, Bardia & Carvalho, Helena, 2022. "The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    15. Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 23-34.
    16. Harshad Sonar & Vivek Khanzode & Milind Akarte, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing Enabled Supply Chain Management: A Review and Research Directions," Vision, , vol. 26(2), pages 147-162, June.
    17. Wen Liu & Xielin Liu & Ying Liu & Jie Wang & Steve Evans & Miying Yang, 2023. "Unpacking Additive Manufacturing Challenges and Opportunities in Moving towards Sustainability: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Marco Savastano & Carlo Amendola & Francesco Bellini & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, 2019. "Contextual Impacts on Industrial Processes Brought by the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, February.
    20. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:143:y:2019:i:c:p:101-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.