IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v114y2022ics0166497221002261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder ties, organizational learning, and business model innovation: A business ecosystem perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yi, Yaqun
  • Chen, Yu
  • Li, Dan

Abstract

Business model exists within business ecosystems, and stakeholders can exert a key influence on a firm's business model innovation. Drawing insights from the business ecosystem perspective and resource-based view, this study examines how ties with stakeholders can affect a focal firm's business model innovation and how the relationship is contingent upon the firm's learning types. Analyses of 210 Chinese firms reveal that the relationship between intra-industry stakeholder ties and business model innovation is inverted U-shaped, while extra-industry stakeholder ties have a positive effect on business model innovation. The relationships between both intra-industry and extra-industry stakeholder ties and business model innovation are weakened by exploitative learning but strengthened by exploratory learning. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Yaqun & Chen, Yu & Li, Dan, 2022. "Stakeholder ties, organizational learning, and business model innovation: A business ecosystem perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0166497221002261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497221002261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Plambeck, Nils, 2012. "The development of new products: The role of firm context and managerial cognition," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 607-621.
    2. Read, Stuart & Song, Michael & Smit, Willem, 2009. "A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 573-587, November.
    3. Yuan, Chun & Xue, Doudou & He, Xin, 2021. "A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    5. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2008. "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Keiningham, Timothy & Aksoy, Lerzan & Bruce, Helen L. & Cadet, Fabienne & Clennell, Natasha & Hodgkinson, Ian R. & Kearney, Treasa, 2020. "Customer experience driven business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 431-440.
    7. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    8. Yuan Li & Haowen Chen & Yi Liu & Mike Peng, 2014. "Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 271-291, March.
    9. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    10. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    11. Jarkko Tapani Pellikka & Pasi Malinen, 2014. "Business Models In The Commercialization Processes Of Innovation Among Small High-Technology Firms," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 1-20.
    12. Huang, Jing-Wen & Li, Yong-Hui, 2012. "Slack resources in team learning and project performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 381-388.
    13. Amrit Tiwana, 2008. "Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 251-272, March.
    14. Benoît Demil & Xavier Lecocq & Joan E. Ricart & Christoph Zott, 2015. "Introduction to theSEJSpecial Issue on Business Models: Business Models within the Domain of Strategic Entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-01563054, HAL.
    15. Nils Plambeck, 2012. "The development of new products: The role of firm context and managerial cognition," Post-Print hal-00731031, HAL.
    16. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    17. Wei, Zelong & Song, Xi & Wang, Donghan, 2017. "Manufacturing flexibility, business model design, and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 87-97.
    18. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    19. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor, 2016. "Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5196-5202.
    20. Patrick Spieth & Dirk Schneckenberg & Kurt Matzler, 2016. "Exploring the linkage between business model (&) innovation and the strategy of the firm," Post-Print hal-02007883, HAL.
    21. Yi, Yaqun & Wang, Yunhui & Shu, Chengli, 2020. "Business model innovations in China: A focus on value propositions," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 787-799.
    22. Mark Loon & Roy Chik, 2019. "Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 87-111, March.
    23. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.
    24. Koberg, Christine S. & Uhlenbruck, Nikolaus & Sarason, Yolanda, 1996. "Facilitators of organizational innovation: The role of life-cycle stage," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 133-149, March.
    25. Christensen, Thomas J. & Snyder, Jack, 1997. "Progressive Research on Degenerate Alliances," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 91(4), pages 919-922, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, Wucheng & Li, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Weijie & Lu, Ruoyu & Zu, Xu, 2024. "Knowledge digitization and high-tech firm performance: A moderated mediation model incorporating business model innovation and entrepreneurial orientation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Xia Liu & Yanhan Sun & Shengshi Zhou & Yu Li & Shan Zhuang, 2024. "Research on time-value-oriented business model innovation path in life services enterprises and its impact on customer perceived value," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Sustainable Business Model Design: A Multi-Case Approach Exploring Generic Strategies and Dynamic Capabilities on the Example of German Wine Estates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2024. "Human Capital, Social Capital and Business Model Design: Empirical Evidence of Tunisian Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4829-4857, March.
    5. Essen, Anna & Frishammar, Johan & Cenamor, Javier, 2023. "Entering non-platformized sectors: The Co-evolution of legitimacy debates and platform business models in digital health care," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Dong, Caiting & Liu, Xielin & Tang, Fangcheng & Qiu, Shumin, 2023. "How upstream innovativeness of ecosystems affects firms' innovation: The contingent role of absorptive capacity and upstream dependence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Weiwei Wu & Jian Shi & Yexin Liu, 2024. "The impact of corporate social responsibility in technological innovation on sustainable competitive performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Xilin He & Renato Lopes da Costa & Debing Ni & Wucheng Han, 2024. "How Quasi-Internal Resources Enhance Firm Performance During Large-Scale Emergencies: The Role of Trade-Off Between CSR and Business Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Fabien Martinez, 2022. "Organizational change in response to environmental complexity: Insights from the business model innovation literature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2299-2314, July.
    10. Shuting Chen & Dengke Yu, 2024. "What Drives Business Model Innovation? Exploring the Role of Knowledge Management Capability in Chinese Top-Ranking Innovative Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6390-6424, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Chun & Xue, Doudou & He, Xin, 2021. "A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Randhawa, Krithika & Wilden, Ralf & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2021. "How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 618-634.
    4. Zhang, Yimeng & Ma, Xinyu & Pang, Jianing & Xing, Hailong & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The impact of digital transformation of manufacturing on corporate performance — The mediating effect of business model innovation and the moderating effect of innovation capability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Zhu, Peiyu & Miao, Xiaoming & Jin, Shumo & Moehler, Robert, 2023. "Transactive memory system, boundary-spanning search and business model innovation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    7. Baoliang Hu & Tao Zhang & Shuai Yan, 2020. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Business Model Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Legitimacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jianmin Song & Senmao Xia & Demetris Vrontis & Arun Sukumar & Bing Liao & Qi Li & Kun Tian & Nengzhi Yao, 2022. "The Source of SMEs’ Competitive Performance in COVID-19: Matching Big Data Analytics Capability to Business Models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1167-1187, August.
    9. Candi, Marina & Kitagawa, Fumi, 2022. "Performance implications of business model centrality over technology-based firms’ life courses," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Origins and Trends," Post-Print hal-01918188, HAL.
    11. Xiangqian Li & Qiang Qiang & Li Huang & Cunquan Huang, 2022. "How Knowledge Sharing Affects Business Model Innovation: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Ambidextrous Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. von Delft, Stephan & Zhao, Yang, 2021. "Business models in process industries: Emerging trends and future research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Jin, Chenglin & Liu, Along & Liu, Hefu & Gu, Jibao & Shao, Meng, 2022. "How business model design drives innovation performance: The roles of product innovation capabilities and technological turbulence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Elena Freisinger & Sven Heidenreich & Christian Landau & Patrick Spieth, 2021. "Business Model Innovation Through the Lens of Time: An Empirical Study of Performance Implications Across Venture Life Cycles," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 339-380, December.
    15. Wei, Zelong & Song, Xi & Wang, Donghan, 2017. "Manufacturing flexibility, business model design, and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 87-97.
    16. Guo, Jingjing & Zhou, Shasha & Chen, Jin & Chen, Qi, 2021. "How information technology capability and knowledge integration capability interact to affect business model design:A polynomial regression with response surface analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    18. Matsuno, Ken & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2020. "Proactive marketing response to population aging: The roles of capabilities and commitment of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 93-104.
    19. Patrick Spieth & Svenja Meissner Née Schuchert, 2018. "Business Model Innovation Alliances: How To Open Business Models For Cooperation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0166497221002261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.