IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v104y2021ics016649722100050x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean additives in a service factory: A design science approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sunder M, Vijaya
  • Ganesh, L.S.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the practical application of Lean with Six Sigma and Agile to create a powerful, synergetic and novel process improvement (PI) method. Going beyond the traditional definitions of Lean, we establish a Factory Physics view of PI which doesn't technically discriminate Lean from non-Lean. We apply a design science approach to help a global bank deploy a continuous process improvement program. By reviewing the literature on PI, we recognize Lean additives viz., Lean Six Sigma and Lean Agile, when synergized, help overcome the limitations of individual PI practices. Our design takes its roots from Factory Physics (FP) and emerges as a novel model synthesizing the theoretical lens of FP with Lean additives for field application. Besides the design of ‘Lean Additives Program’, we deployed the model in several iterations, and studied its performance over a three-year period. The improved system exhibited high levels of efficiency and effectiveness. The longitudinal case evidence demonstrates that Lean additives offer both operational and strategic benefits in firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunder M, Vijaya & Ganesh, L.S., 2021. "Lean additives in a service factory: A design science approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s016649722100050x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722100050X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Stewart & Radnor, Zoe J. & Burgess, Nicola & Worthington, Claire, 2012. "SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 188-197.
    2. Vanderstraeten, Johanna & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen & Matthyssens, Paul, 2020. "Organizational sponsorship and service co-development: A contingency view on service co-development directiveness of business incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Vijaya Sunder M & Anupama Prashar, 2020. "Empirical examination of critical failure factors of continuous improvement deployments: stage-wise results and a contingency theory perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 4894-4915, July.
    4. Norman Roth & Jochen Deuse & Hubert Biedermann, 2020. "A framework for System Excellence assessment of production systems, based on lean thinking, business excellence, and factory physics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1074-1091, February.
    5. Giachetti, Ronald E. & Martinez, Luis D. & Saenz, Oscar A. & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2003. "Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 47-62, October.
    6. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    7. Torbjørn H. Netland, 2016. "Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2433-2448, April.
    8. Agarwal, Ashish & Shankar, Ravi & Tiwari, M.K., 2006. "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 211-225, August.
    9. Vijaya Sunder M., 2016. "Constructs of quality in higher education services," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(8), pages 1091-1111, November.
    10. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    11. Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2011. "On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 342-354, May.
    12. Joseph G. Walls & George R. Widmeyer & Omar A. El Sawy, 1992. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 36-59, March.
    13. Thomas C. Powell, 1995. "Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 15-37.
    14. Zoe Radnor & Paul Walley, 2008. "Learning to Walk Before We Try to Run: Adapting Lean for the Public Sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 13-20, February.
    15. Bin Zhou, 2016. "Lean principles, practices, and impacts: a study on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 241(1), pages 457-474, June.
    16. Kuo-Ting Hung & Jeffrey K. Liker, 2007. "A simulation study of pull system responsiveness considering production condition influences," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 123-136.
    17. Peter Hines & Sarah Lethbridge, 2008. "New Development: Creating a Lean University," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 53-56, February.
    18. Wang, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Min & Sun, Hongyi & Zhu, Guilong, 2016. "Effects of standardization and innovation on mass customization: An empirical investigation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 48, pages 79-86.
    19. Bill McKelvey, 1978. "Organizational Systematics: Taxonomic Lessons from Biology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(13), pages 1428-1440, September.
    20. Shradha Gupta & Monica Sharma & Vijaya Sunder M., 2016. "Lean services: a systematic review," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(8), pages 1025-1056, November.
    21. Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav & Benita, Francisco & López-Ramos, Francisco & Hernández-Luna, Alberto, 2017. "Bi-objective project portfolio selection in Lean Six Sigma," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 81-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunder M, Vijaya & Prashar, Anupama, 2024. "The interplay of lean practices and digitalization on organizational learning systems and operational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    2. Catherine Maware & David M. Parsley, 2022. "The Challenges of Lean Transformation and Implementation in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Alkhoraif, Abdullah & Rashid, Hamad & McLaughlin, Patrick, 2019. "Lean implementation in small and medium enterprises: Literature review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    4. Hendrik Haße & Hendrik Valk & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Design Principles for Shared Digital Twins in Distributed Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 751-772, December.
    5. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    6. Oluwaseun Niyi Anifowose & Matina Ghasemi & Banji Rildwan Olaleye, 2022. "Total Quality Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Mariano Jiménez & Luis Romero & Jon Fernández & María del Mar Espinosa & Manuel Domínguez, 2019. "Extension of the Lean 5S Methodology to 6S with An Additional Layer to Ensure Occupational Safety and Health Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    9. Lu, Wenrong & McFarlane, Duncan & Giannikas, Vaggelis & Zhang, Quan, 2016. "An algorithm for dynamic order-picking in warehouse operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 107-122.
    10. Geerts, Guido L., 2011. "A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 142-151.
    11. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2019. "The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on a Supply Chain Relationship and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Yongbo Li & Ali Diabat & Chung-Cheng Lu, 2020. "Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 303-322, April.
    13. Sophie Fenner & Torbjørn Netland, 2023. "Lean service: a contingency perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1271-1289, September.
    14. Muhammad Shafiq & Adeel Akhtar & Muhammad Ismail & Muhammad Awais, 2021. "Lean Management Readiness Assessment Framework For Humanitarian Organizations Supply Chain Management," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 151-171, September.
    15. Andreas Kakouris & Eleni Sfakianaki & Marios Tsioufis, 2022. "Lean thinking in lean times for education," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 657-697, September.
    16. Aaron W. Baur, 0. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    17. Aaron W. Baur, 2017. "Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 231-251, April.
    18. Matthias Voigt & Katrin Bergener & Jörg Becker, 2013. "Comprehensive Support for Creativity-Intensive Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(4), pages 227-242, August.
    19. María Mojarro-Magaña & Jesús Everardo Olguín-Tiznado & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Claudia Camargo-Wilson & Juan Andrés López-Barreras & Rubén Jesús Pérez-López, 2018. "Impact of the Planning from the Kanban System on the Company’s Operating Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s016649722100050x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.