IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v96y2015icp102-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear increment in efficiency with the inclusion of surrogate endpoint

Author

Listed:
  • Banerjee, Buddhananda
  • Biswas, Atanu

Abstract

In a two-sample clinical trial, a fixed proportion of true-and-surrogate and the remaining only-surrogate responses are observed. We quantify the increase in efficiency to compare the treatments as a linear function of the proportion of available true responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Banerjee, Buddhananda & Biswas, Atanu, 2015. "Linear increment in efficiency with the inclusion of surrogate endpoint," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 102-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:96:y:2015:i:c:p:102-108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2014.09.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715214003265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2014.09.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue Wang & Jeremy M. G. Taylor, 2002. "A Measure of the Proportion of Treatment Effect Explained by a Surrogate Marker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 803-812, December.
    2. Hua Chen & Zhi Geng & Jinzhu Jia, 2007. "Criteria for surrogate end points," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 919-932, November.
    3. Chen S.X. & Leung D.H.Y. & Qin J., 2003. "Information Recovery in a Study With Surrogate Endpoints," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 1052-1062, January.
    4. C. B. Begg & D. H. Y. Leung, 2000. "On the use of surrogate end points in randomized trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(1), pages 15-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Zhuang & Ying Qing Chen, 2020. "Measuring Surrogacy in Clinical Research," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 295-323, December.
    2. Song Xi Chen & Denis H. Y. Leung & Jing Qin, 2008. "Improving semiparametric estimation by using surrogate data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 803-823, September.
    3. Cheng Zheng & Lei Liu, 2022. "Quantifying direct and indirect effect for longitudinal mediator and survival outcome using joint modeling approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1233-1243, September.
    4. Jiafeng Chen & David M. Ritzwoller, 2021. "Semiparametric Estimation of Long-Term Treatment Effects," Papers 2107.14405, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    5. Gengsheng Qin & Baoying Yang & Nelly Belinga-Hall, 2013. "Empirical likelihood-based inferences for the Lorenz curve," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(1), pages 1-21, February.
    6. VanderWeele Tyler J, 2011. "Principal Stratification -- Uses and Limitations," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Christine Mulhern & Isaac M. Opper, 2021. "Measuring and Summarizing the Multiple Dimensions of Teacher Effectiveness," CESifo Working Paper Series 9263, CESifo.
    8. Tomasz Burzykowski & Geert Molenberghs & Marc Buyse, 2004. "The validation of surrogate end points by using data from randomized clinical trials: a case‐study in advanced colorectal cancer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(1), pages 103-124, February.
    9. Fatema Shafie Khorassani & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Niko Kaciroti & Michael R. Elliott, 2023. "Incorporating Covariates into Measures of Surrogate Paradox Risk," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Stuart G. Baker & Grant Izmirlian & Victor Kipnis, 2005. "Resolving paradoxes involving surrogate end points," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(4), pages 753-762, November.
    11. Zhihong Cai & Manabu Kuroki & Judea Pearl & Jin Tian, 2008. "Bounds on Direct Effects in the Presence of Confounded Intermediate Variables," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 695-701, September.
    12. Keith Battocchi & Eleanor Dillon & Maggie Hei & Greg Lewis & Miruna Oprescu & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2021. "Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Novel Treatments," Papers 2103.08390, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    13. Yuichi Kitamura, 2006. "Empirical Likelihood Methods in Econometrics: Theory and Practice," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-430, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    14. Layla Parast & Tianxi Cai & Lu Tian, 2021. "Evaluating multiple surrogate markers with censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1315-1327, December.
    15. Debashis Ghosh & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Daniel J. Sargent, 2012. "Meta-analysis for Surrogacy: Accelerated Failure Time Models and Semicompeting Risks Modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 226-232, March.
    16. Yun Li & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Roderick J. A. Little, 2011. "A Shrinkage Approach for Estimating a Treatment Effect Using Intermediate Biomarker Data in Clinical Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1434-1441, December.
    17. Isaac Meza & Rahul Singh, 2021. "Nested Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression: Long Term, Mediated, and Time Varying Treatment Effects," Papers 2112.14249, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    18. Guido Imbens & Nathan Kallus & Xiaojie Mao & Yuhao Wang, 2022. "Long-term Causal Inference Under Persistent Confounding via Data Combination," Papers 2202.07234, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    19. Layla Parast & Tanya P. Garcia & Ross L. Prentice & Raymond J. Carroll, 2022. "Robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating a surrogate marker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 9-23, March.
    20. Baojiang Chen & Jing Qin, 2014. "Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 289-298, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:96:y:2015:i:c:p:102-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.