IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v76y2006i13p1385-1396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model checks of higher order time series

Author

Listed:
  • Stute, W.
  • Presedo Quindimil, M.
  • González Manteiga, W.
  • Koul, H.L.

Abstract

In this paper we propose and study nonparametric tests for the validity of higher order time-series models. These are based on properly defined residual cusums. In a simulation study it is shown that these tests outperform others when the time series has a dimension reducing character and the dimension becomes large.

Suggested Citation

  • Stute, W. & Presedo Quindimil, M. & González Manteiga, W. & Koul, H.L., 2006. "Model checks of higher order time series," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(13), pages 1385-1396, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:76:y:2006:i:13:p:1385-1396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(06)00046-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐Michel Poggi & Bruno Portier, 1997. "A Test of Linearity for Functional Autoregressive Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(6), pages 615-639, November.
    2. D. Y. Lin & L. J. Wei & Z. Ying, 2002. "Model-Checking Techniques Based on Cumulative Residuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Winfried Stute & Li‐Xing Zhu, 2002. "Model Checks for Generalized Linear Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 535-545, September.
    4. Manuel Dominguez & Ignacio Lobato, 2003. "Testing the Martingale Difference Hypothesis," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 351-377.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    2. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Mayoral, Silvia, 2010. "Data-driven smooth tests for the martingale difference hypothesis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1983-1998, August.
    3. Joseph Ngatchou-Wandji & Madan L. Puri & Michel Harel & Echarif Elharfaoui, 2019. "Testing nonstationary and absolutely regular nonlinear time series models," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 557-593, October.
    4. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    5. Qiang Xia & Kejun He & Cuizhen Niu, 2017. "A Model-Adaptive Test for Parametric Single-Index Time Series Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 981-999, November.
    6. Herman J. Bierens & Li Wang, 2017. "Weighted simulated integrated conditional moment tests for parametric conditional distributions of stationary time series processes," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1-3), pages 103-135, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Zhang & Xia Cui & Heng Peng, 2020. "Estimation and hypothesis test for partial linear single-index multiplicative models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(3), pages 699-740, June.
    2. Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Xiaoyan Shi, 2009. "Diagnostic Measures for Generalized Linear Models with Missing Covariates," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(4), pages 686-712, December.
    3. Sun, Zhihua & Chen, Feifei & Zhou, Xiaohua & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2017. "Improved model checking methods for parametric models with responses missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 147-161.
    4. Colling, Benjamin & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models using the integrated regression function," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016031, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Zhu, Lixing & Zhu, Ruoqing & Song, Song, 2008. "Diagnostic checking for multivariate regression models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(9), pages 1841-1859, October.
    6. Sun, Zhihua & Wang, Qihua & Dai, Pengjie, 2009. "Model checking for partially linear models with missing responses at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 636-651, April.
    7. Chen, Bin & Song, Zhaogang, 2013. "Testing whether the underlying continuous-time process follows a diffusion: An infinitesimal operator-based approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 83-107.
    8. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Kim, Jae H., 2011. "Small sample properties of alternative tests for martingale difference hypothesis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 151-154, February.
    9. Fan Fang & Carmine Ventre & Michail Basios & Leslie Kanthan & David Martinez-Rego & Fan Wu & Lingbo Li, 2022. "Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-59, December.
    10. Miguel A. Delgado & Javier Hidalgo & Carlos Velasco, 2005. "Distribution Free Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Linear Processes," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 482, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    11. Hamidi Sahneh, Mehdi, 2015. "Are the shocks obtained from SVAR fundamental?," MPRA Paper 65126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. repec:wyi:journl:002156 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Liu, Juxin & Ma, Yanyuan & Johnstone, Jill, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for zero-inflated Poisson mixed effects models in tree abundance studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Kyungchul Song, 2007. "Asymptotically Optimal Tests for Single-Index Restrictions with a Focus on Average Partial Effects," PIER Working Paper Archive 07-005, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    15. Kheifets, Igor & Velasco, Carlos, 2017. "New goodness-of-fit diagnostics for conditional discrete response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 135-149.
    16. Jun Wang & Dianpeng Wang & Yubin Tian, 2022. "Multidimensional specification test based on non-stationary time series," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(2), pages 348-372, June.
    17. Kuo-Chin Lin & Yi-Ju Chen, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests of generalized linear mixed models for repeated ordinal responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2053-2064, August.
    18. N. Balakrishna & H. L. Koul & M. Ossiander & L. Sakhanenko, 2019. "Fitting a pth Order Parametric Generalized Linear Autoregressive Multiplicative Error Model," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 103-122, September.
    19. Lili Xia & Tingyu Lai & Zhongzhan Zhang, 2023. "An Adaptive-to-Model Test for Parametric Functional Single-Index Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Vieito, João Paulo & Wong, Wing-Keung & Chow, Sheung Chi, 2016. "Stock Market Liberalizations and Efficiency: The Case of Latin America," MPRA Paper 68949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Jakob Peterlin & Nataša Kejžar & Rok Blagus, 2023. "Correct specification of design matrices in linear mixed effects models: tests with graphical representation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 184-210, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:76:y:2006:i:13:p:1385-1396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.