IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v205y2024ics0167715223001864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating a VaR-type ruin measure by Laguerre series expansion in classical compound Poisson risk model

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Wen
  • Yong, Yaodi

Abstract

Value at Risk (VaR) has been extensively applied within the banking and financial sectors. Regulators use it to reflect riskiness and determine capital requirements. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for estimating a VaR-type ruin measure under the classical risk model. We first use Laguerre series expansion to approximate the ruin probability and utilize a tabularization method to approximate the VaR-type ruin measure. A practical scenario where the distribution of individual claim size and the Poisson intensity are unknown has been considered. Based on observed data providing claim information, we illustrate the estimation of the VaR ruin measure. Moreover, the approximation convergence rates and statistical errors are studied, respectively. Various numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Wen & Yong, Yaodi, 2024. "Estimating a VaR-type ruin measure by Laguerre series expansion in classical compound Poisson risk model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:205:y:2024:i:c:s0167715223001864
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2023.109962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715223001864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2023.109962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramsay, Colin M., 2003. "A solution to the ruin problem for Pareto distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-116, August.
    2. F. Comte & C. Dion, 2016. "Nonparametric estimation in a multiplicative censoring model with symmetric noise," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 768-801, October.
    3. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2007. "Optimal Retention for a Stop-loss Reinsurance Under the VaR and CTE Risk Measures," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 93-112, May.
    4. Robert Sollis, 2009. "Value at risk: a critical overview," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 398-414, November.
    5. Yasutaka Shimizu & Zhimin Zhang, 2019. "Asymptotically Normal Estimators of the Ruin Probability for Lévy Insurance Surplus from Discrete Samples," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Zhimin Zhang & Wen Su, 2018. "A new efficient method for estimating the Gerber–Shiu function in the classical risk model," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(5), pages 426-449, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zan Yu & Lianzeng Zhang, 2024. "Computing the Gerber-Shiu function with interest and a constant dividend barrier by physics-informed neural networks," Papers 2401.04378, arXiv.org.
    2. Junhong Du & Zhiming Li & Lijun Wu, 2019. "Optimal Stop-Loss Reinsurance Under the VaR and CTE Risk Measures: Variable Transformation Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1133-1151, March.
    3. Ambrose Lo & Zhaofeng Tang, 2019. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies in the presence of individual risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 395-423, March.
    4. Danijel Grahovac, 2018. "Densities of Ruin-Related Quantities in the Cramér-Lundberg Model with Pareto Claims," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-288, March.
    5. Suci Sari & Arief Hakim & Ikha Magdalena & Khreshna Syuhada, 2023. "Modeling the Optimal Combination of Proportional and Stop-Loss Reinsurance with Dependent Claim and Stochastic Insurance Premium," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. He, Yue & Kawai, Reiichiro & Shimizu, Yasutaka & Yamazaki, Kazutoshi, 2023. "The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-28.
    7. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    8. Jianfa Cong & Ken Tan, 2016. "Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 177-202, February.
    9. Peralta, Oscar & Rojas-Nandayapa, Leonardo & Xie, Wangyue & Yao, Hui, 2018. "Approximation of ruin probabilities via Erlangized scale mixtures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 136-156.
    10. Laureano Escudero & Eva-María Ortega, 2009. "How retention levels influence the variability of the total risk under reinsurance," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(1), pages 139-157, July.
    11. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2011. "Stable solutions for optimal reinsurance problems involving risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 796-804, November.
    12. Caibin Zhang & Zhibin Liang & Kam Chuen Yuen, 2019. "Optimal dynamic reinsurance with common shock dependence and state-dependent risk aversion," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-45, March.
    13. Chi, Yichun & Liu, Fangda, 2017. "Optimal insurance design in the presence of exclusion clauses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-195.
    14. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2010. "Stability of the optimal reinsurance with respect to the risk measure," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb100201, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    16. Amir T. Payandeh-Najafabadi & Ali Panahi-Bazaz, 2017. "An Optimal Combination of Proportional and Stop-Loss Reinsurance Contracts From Insurer's and Reinsurer's Viewpoints," Papers 1701.05450, arXiv.org.
    17. Cheung, K.C. & Chong, W.F. & Yam, S.C.P., 2015. "The optimal insurance under disappointment theories," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-90.
    18. Jianfa Cong & Ken Seng Tan, 2016. "Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 177-202, February.
    19. Boonen, Tim J. & Tan, Ken Seng & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2021. "Optimal reinsurance with multiple reinsurers: Competitive pricing and coalition stability," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 302-319.
    20. Mario Brandtner, 2016. "Spektrale Risikomaße: Konzeption, betriebswirtschaftliche Anwendungen und Fallstricke," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 75-115, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:205:y:2024:i:c:s0167715223001864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.