IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v126y2017icp97-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderate deviations for neutral stochastic differential delay equations with jumps

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Xiaocui
  • Xi, Fubao

Abstract

A moderate deviation principle for neutral stochastic differential delay equations driven by Poisson random measure is established. The weak convergence method introduced by Budhiraja et al. (2016) plays a key role.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Xiaocui & Xi, Fubao, 2017. "Moderate deviations for neutral stochastic differential delay equations with jumps," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 97-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:126:y:2017:i:c:p:97-107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715217300901
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 1999. "Asymptotically Optimal Importance Sampling and Stratification for Pricing Path‐Dependent Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 117-152, April.
    2. Budhiraja, Amarjit & Chen, Jiang & Dupuis, Paul, 2013. "Large deviations for stochastic partial differential equations driven by a Poisson random measure," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 523-560.
    3. Gao, Fu-Qing, 1996. "Moderate deviations for martingales and mixing random processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 263-275, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Chulwoo & Park, Frank C., 2022. "A geometric framework for covariance dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Xueping Wu & Jin Zhang, 1999. "Options on the minimum or the maximum of two average prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 183-204, May.
    3. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2000. "Variance Reduction Techniques for Estimating Value-at-Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(10), pages 1349-1364, October.
    4. Shih-Kuei Lin & Ren-Her Wang & Cheng-Der Fuh, 2006. "Risk Management for Linear and Non-Linear Assets: A Bootstrap Method with Importance Resampling to Evaluate Value-at-Risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 13(3), pages 261-295, September.
    5. Genin, Adrien & Tankov, Peter, 2020. "Optimal importance sampling for Lévy processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 20-46.
    6. Xiaoqun Wang & Ian H. Sloan, 2011. "Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 80-95, February.
    7. Pierre Etore & Gersende Fort & Benjamin Jourdain & Eric Moulines, 2011. "On adaptive stratification," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 127-154, September.
    8. Louis-Pierre Arguin & Nien-Lin Liu & Tai-Ho Wang, 2018. "Most-Likely-Path In Asian Option Pricing Under Local Volatility Models," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-32, August.
    9. Dingeç, Kemal Dinçer & Hörmann, Wolfgang, 2013. "Control variates and conditional Monte Carlo for basket and Asian options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 421-434.
    10. Adrien Genin & Peter Tankov, 2016. "Optimal importance sampling for L\'evy Processes," Papers 1608.04621, arXiv.org.
    11. Sak, Halis & Başoğlu, İsmail, 2017. "Efficient randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods for portfolio market risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 87-94.
    12. Benoist, Tristan & Fatras, Jan-Luka & Pellegrini, Clément, 2023. "Limit theorems for quantum trajectories," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 288-310.
    13. Hatem Ben-Ameur & Michèle Breton & Pierre L'Ecuyer, 2002. "A Dynamic Programming Procedure for Pricing American-Style Asian Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 625-643, May.
    14. Frikha Noufel & Sagna Abass, 2012. "Quantization based recursive importance sampling," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 287-326, December.
    15. Zhu, Lingjiong, 2013. "Moderate deviations for Hawkes processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 885-890.
    16. Paul Glasserman & Jingyi Li, 2005. "Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1643-1656, November.
    17. Antoine Jacquier & Alexandre Pannier, 2020. "Large and moderate deviations for stochastic Volterra systems," Papers 2004.10571, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    18. Kahalé, Nabil, 2020. "General multilevel Monte Carlo methods for pricing discretely monitored Asian options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 739-748.
    19. Arouna Bouhari, 2004. "Adaptative Monte Carlo Method, A Variance Reduction Technique," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Hernan P. Awad & Peter W. Glynn & Reuven Y. Rubinstein, 2013. "Zero-Variance Importance Sampling Estimators for Markov Process Expectations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 358-388, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:126:y:2017:i:c:p:97-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.