IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v115y2005i1p41-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comonotonic theorem for BSDEs

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Zengjing
  • Kulperger, Reg
  • Wei, Gang

Abstract

Pardoux and Peng (Systems Control Lett. 14 (1990) 55) introduced a class of nonlinear backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs). According to Pardoux and Peng's theorem, the solution of this type of BSDE consists of a pair of adapted processes, say (y,z). Since then, many researchers have been exploring the properties of this pair solution (y,z), especially the properties of the first part y. In this paper, we shall explore the properties of the second part z. A comonotonic theorem with respect to z is obtained. As an application of this theorem, we prove an integral representation theorem of the solution of BSDEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Zengjing & Kulperger, Reg & Wei, Gang, 2005. "A comonotonic theorem for BSDEs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 41-54, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:115:y:2005:i:1:p:41-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4149(04)00134-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zengjing Chen & Larry Epstein, 2002. "Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1403-1443, July.
    2. N. El Karoui & S. Peng & M. C. Quenez, 1997. "Backward Stochastic Differential Equations in Finance," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 1-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Zengjing & Kulperger, Reg, 2005. "Inequalities for upper and lower probabilities," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 233-241, July.
    2. Ryota Iijima & Akitada Kasahara, 2016. "Gradual Adjustment and Equilibrium Uniqueness under Noisy Monitoring," ISER Discussion Paper 0965, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    3. He, Kun & Hu, Mingshang & Chen, Zengjing, 2009. "The relationship between risk measures and choquet expectations in the framework of g-expectations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 508-512, February.
    4. Ji, Shaolin & Shi, Xiaomin, 2018. "Reaching goals under ambiguity: Continuous-time optimal portfolio selection," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 63-69.
    5. Chen, Zengjing & Kulperger, Reg, 2006. "Minimax pricing and Choquet pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 518-528, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zengjing & Kulperger, Reg, 2006. "Minimax pricing and Choquet pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 518-528, June.
    2. Jianjun Miao, 2009. "Ambiguity, Risk and Portfolio Choice under Incomplete Information," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 10(2), pages 257-279, November.
    3. Carole Bernard & Shaolin Ji & Weidong Tian, 2013. "An optimal insurance design problem under Knightian uncertainty," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 36(2), pages 99-124, November.
    4. Jiang, Long, 2005. "Converse comparison theorems for backward stochastic differential equations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 173-183, February.
    5. Huiwen Yan & Gechun Liang & Zhou Yang, 2015. "Indifference Pricing and Hedging in a Multiple-Priors Model with Trading Constraints," Papers 1503.08969, arXiv.org.
    6. Shaolin Ji & Xiaomin Shi, 2016. "Recursive utility optimization with concave coefficients," Papers 1607.00721, arXiv.org.
    7. Kyoung Jin Choi & Hyeng Keun Koo & Do Young Kwak, 2004. "Optimal Stopping of Active Portfolio Management," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 5(1), pages 93-126, May.
    8. Shaolin Ji & Xiaomin Shi, 2016. "Recursive utility maximization under partial information," Papers 1605.05802, arXiv.org.
    9. Yuki Shigeta, 2016. "Optimal Switching under Ambiguity and Its Applications in Finance," Papers 1608.06045, arXiv.org.
    10. Stadje, M.A. & Pelsser, A., 2014. "Time-Consistent and Market-Consistent Evaluations (Revised version of 2012-086)," Discussion Paper 2014-002, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    11. Lazrak, Ali & Zapatero, Fernando, 2004. "Efficient consumption set under recursive utility and unknown beliefs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 207-226, February.
    12. Antoon Pelsser & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Time-Consistent And Market-Consistent Evaluations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 25-65, January.
    13. Cohen, Samuel N. & Ji, Shaolin & Yang, Shuzhen, 2014. "A generalized Girsanov transformation of finite state stochastic processes in discrete time," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 33-39.
    14. Vorbrink, Jörg, 2014. "Financial markets with volatility uncertainty," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 64-78.
    15. Wei Chen, 2013. "Fractional G-White Noise Theory, Wavelet Decomposition for Fractional G-Brownian Motion, and Bid-Ask Pricing Application to Finance Under Uncertainty," Papers 1306.4070, arXiv.org.
    16. Zhang, Huanjun & Yan, Zhiguo, 2020. "Backward stochastic optimal control with mixed deterministic controller and random controller and its applications in linear-quadratic control," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    17. Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2006. "Risk measures via g-expectations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 19-34, August.
    18. Zhao, Guoqing, 2009. "Lenglart domination inequalities for g-expectations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(22), pages 2338-2342, November.
    19. Roger J. A. Laeven & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Robust Portfolio Choice and Indifference Valuation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1109-1141, November.
    20. Hu, Mingshang & Ji, Shaolin, 2017. "Dynamic programming principle for stochastic recursive optimal control problem driven by a G-Brownian motion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 107-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:115:y:2005:i:1:p:41-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.