IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v74y2012i3p313-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public, private, neither, both? Publicness theory and the analysis of healthcare organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Stuart

Abstract

In England recent health reforms have resulted in a shift of emphasis from targets to outcomes, and to the provision of healthcare by any willing provider. The outcomes described encompass clinical and public service outcomes such as choice and access. The range of organisations providing healthcare services is large and increasing. Whilst many are clearly located in either the public or private sectors, others have features of both public and private organisations, and are not easily characterised as either one or the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Stuart, 2012. "Public, private, neither, both? Publicness theory and the analysis of healthcare organisations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 313-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:3:p:313-322
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611004862
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau & Stephen H. Linder, 2003. "Two Decades of Research Comparing For‐Profit and Nonprofit Health Provider Performance in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(2), pages 219-241, June.
    2. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Elizabeth Fournier, 2004. "Dimensions of publicness and performance in substance abuse treatment organizations," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 49-70.
    3. George Boyne & Jennifer Law, 2005. "Setting Public Service Outcome Targets: Lessons from Local Public Service Agreements," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 253-260.
    4. Paul C. Nutt, 2000. "Decision‐Making Success in Public, Private and Third Sector Organisations: Finding Sector Dependent Best Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-1, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Rauh, 2015. "Problems in Identifying Public and Private Organizations: A Demonstration Using a Simple Naive Bayesian Classification," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-47, March.
    2. Gábor Dávid Kiss & Mercédesz Mészáros, 2019. "Exchange Rate Modeling under Unconventional Monetary Policy on a European Panel Sample," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3), pages 05-24.
    3. Fabrice Hamelin & Vincent Spenlehauer, 2014. "Managing to Reinvent Strong Publicness in a Privatized World," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 419-438, September.
    4. Leroy White & Andy Lockett & Graeme Currie & James Hayton, 2021. "Hybrid Context, Management Practices and Organizational Performance: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 718-748, May.
    5. Angelovská Olga & Novotný Vilém, 2022. "Reforms of Czech Hospitals in Multiple Streams Perspective: The Cases of Success and Failure," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 30-45, December.
    6. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    7. Cheng, Terence C. & Joyce, Catherine M. & Scott, Anthony, 2013. "An empirical analysis of public and private medical practice in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 43-51.
    8. Currie, Graeme & Dingwall, Robert & Kitchener, Martin & Waring, Justin, 2012. "Let’s dance: Organization studies, medical sociology and health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 273-280.
    9. Iversen, Evald Bundgaard & Cuskelly, Graham, 2015. "Effects of different policy approaches on sport facility utilisation strategies," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 529-541.
    10. Faina MILMAN‐SIVAN & Yair SAGY, 2020. "On the International Labour Organization and prison labour: An invitation to recalibrate," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(4), pages 505-524, December.
    11. Josef Krupička, 2020. "The Management Accounting Practices in Healthcare: The Case of Czech Public Hospitals," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(1), pages 53-66.
    12. Alvaro S Almeida, 2016. "The Role Of Private Non-Profit Healthcare Organizations In Nhs Systems: Implications For The Portuguese Hospital Devolution Program," FEP Working Papers 577, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngju Kang & Minyoung Kim & Kwangho Jung, 2020. "The Equity of Health Care Spending in South Korea: Testing the Impact of Publicness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.
    3. Patrick J. Devlin, 2010. "Exploring efficiency's dominance: the wholeness of the process," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 141-162, June.
    4. Jonathan Rauh, 2015. "Problems in Identifying Public and Private Organizations: A Demonstration Using a Simple Naive Bayesian Classification," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-47, March.
    5. Woodward, Albert & Das, Abhik & Raskin, Ira E. & Morgan-Lopez, Antonio A., 2006. "An exploratory analysis of treatment completion and client and organizational factors using hierarchical linear modeling," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 335-351, November.
    6. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    7. Fabio DE MATTEIS & Daniela PREITE, 2013. "Italian Local Public Services: Some Governance Highlights From The Larger Cities� Experience," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 3(3), pages 7-17, June.
    8. Roberto A. Trevino & Alan J. Richard, 2012. "Public Funding and Affordability of Substance Abuse Treatment Services," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 72-83, February.
    9. Sverre Grepperud, 2015. "Is the hospital decision to seek accreditation an effective one?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 56-68, January.
    10. Karen Eggleston & Yu‐Chu Shen & Joseph Lau & Christopher H. Schmid & Jia Chan, 2008. "Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results in the literature?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(12), pages 1345-1362, December.
    11. Mati Dubrovinsky & Ralph A. Winter, 2015. "Organizational form and output quality," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(1), pages 189-206, February.
    12. Haslam Alyson & Nesbit Rebecca & Christensen Robert K., 2019. "The Dynamic Impact of Nonprofit Organizations: Are Health-Related Nonprofit Organizations Associated with Improvements in Obesity at the Community Level?," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Cristian A Herrera & Gabriel Rada & Lucy Kuhn-Barrientos & Ximena Barrios, 2014. "Does Ownership Matter? An Overview of Systematic Reviews of the Performance of Private For-Profit, Private Not-For-Profit and Public Healthcare Providers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Leroy White & Andy Lockett & Graeme Currie & James Hayton, 2021. "Hybrid Context, Management Practices and Organizational Performance: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 718-748, May.
    15. Julius A. Nukpezah & P. Edward French & Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski & Victor O. Flomo, 2022. "The Moderating Effects of Organizational Publicness on Determinants of the U.S. Federal Employee’s Job Satisfaction," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 883-901, December.
    16. Knudsen, Hannah K. & Abraham, Amanda J. & Oser, Carrie B., 2011. "Barriers to the implementation of medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders: The importance of funding policies and medical infrastructure," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 375-381, November.
    17. Manolopoulos Dimitris & Salavou Helen & Papadopoulos Andrew & Xenakis Michail, 2024. "Strategic Decision-Making and Performance in Social Enterprises: Process Dimensions and the Influence of Entrepreneurs’ Proactive Personality," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 631-675, April.
    18. Abdul Majid & Naila Tabassum, 2012. "Analysis of Environmental Complexities and the Associated Dynamics for Development of SME Sector in Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(9), pages 496-501.
    19. Tzafrir, Shay S. & Gur, Amit Ben-Aharon & Blumen, Orna, 2015. "Employee social environment (ESE) as a tool to decrease intention to leave," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 136-146.
    20. Mario Nicoliello & Dennis Tracchia, 2014. "La misurazione della performance nel settore pubblico: il caso del trasporto pubblico locale," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 35-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:3:p:313-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.