IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v74y2012i10p1486-1493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • White, Heather L.
  • Mulambia, Chishimba
  • Sinkala, Moses
  • Mwanahamuntu, Mulindi H.
  • Parham, Groesbeck P.
  • Moneyham, Linda
  • Grimley, Diane M.
  • Chamot, Eric

Abstract

Invasive cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide, with approximately 85% of the disease burden occurring in developing countries. To date, there have been few systematic efforts to document African women's conceptualization of cervical cancer after participation in a visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA)-based “see and treat” cervical cancer prevention program. In this study, conducted between September, 2009–July, 2010, focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with 60 women who had recently undergone cervical cancer screening at a government-operated primary health care clinic in Lusaka, Zambia. Interviewers elicited participants' causal representations of cervical cancer, associated physical signs and symptoms, perceived physical and psychological effects, and social norms regarding the disease. The lay model of illness causation portrayed by participants after recent exposure to program promotion messages departed in several ways from causal models described in other parts of the world. However, causal conceptualizations included both lay and biomedical elements, suggesting a possible shift from a purely traditional causal model to one that incorporates both traditional concepts and recently promoted biomedical concepts. Most, but not all, women still equated cervical cancer with death, and perceived it to be a highly stigmatized disease in Zambia because of its anatomic location, dire natural course, connections to socially-condemned behaviors, and association with HIV/AIDS. No substantive differences of disease conceptualization existed according to HIV serostatus, though HIV positive women acknowledged that their immune status makes them more aware of their health and more likely to seek medical attention. Further attention should be dedicated to the processes by which women incorporate new knowledge into their representations of cervical cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Heather L. & Mulambia, Chishimba & Sinkala, Moses & Mwanahamuntu, Mulindi H. & Parham, Groesbeck P. & Moneyham, Linda & Grimley, Diane M. & Chamot, Eric, 2012. "‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1486-1493.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:10:p:1486-1493
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953612001451
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephenson, R. & Baschieri, A. & Clements, S. & Hennink, M. & Madise, N., 2007. "Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(7), pages 1233-1240.
    2. Wood, Katharine & Jewkes, Rachel & Abrahams, Naeemah, 1997. "Cleaning the womb: Constructions of cervical screening and womb cancer among rural Black women in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 283-294, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kangmennaang, Joseph & Onyango, Elizabeth O. & Luginaah, Isaac & Elliott, Susan J., 2018. "The next Sub Saharan African epidemic? A case study of the determinants of cervical cancer knowledge and screening in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 203-212.
    2. Le Thi Ngoc Phuc, 2016. "Understanding of cervical cancer and screening among Vietnamese female sex workers in Ho Chi Minh City," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 6(1), pages 24-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wray, Natalie & Markovic, Milica & Manderson, Lenore, 2007. "Discourses of normality and difference: Responses to diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological cancer of Australian women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 2260-2271, June.
    2. Masiano, Steven P. & Green, Tiffany L. & Dahman, Bassam & Kimmel, April D., 2019. "The effects of community-based distribution of family planning services on contraceptive use: The case of a national scale-up in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Katelyn Sileo & Rhoda Wanyenze & Haruna Lule & Susan Kiene, 2015. "Determinants of family planning service uptake and use of contraceptives among postpartum women in rural Uganda," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(8), pages 987-997, December.
    4. Esther O Lamidi, 2015. "State Variations in Women’s Socioeconomic Status and Use of Modern Contraceptives in Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Tamar Goldenberg & Rob Stephenson, 2019. "Applying a deviance framework to understand modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Hannah Tappis & Anis Kazi & Waqas Hameed & Zaib Dahar & Anayat Ali & Sohail Agha, 2015. "The Role of Quality Health Services and Discussion about Birth Spacing in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Sindh, Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2023. "The role of male partners in modern contraceptive use by women in South Africa: Does space also matter?," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Sylvain Dessy & Setou Diarra & Roland Pongou, 2017. "Underage Brides and Grooms’ Education," Working Papers 1704E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    9. Grant Miller & Aureo de Paula & Christine Valente, 2020. "Subjective Expectations and Demand for Contraception," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 20/724, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    10. Sylvain Dessy, Setou Diarra, Roland Pongou & Setou Diarra & Roland Pongou, 2016. "Adolescent Brides and Grooms' Education: Theory and Evidence," Cahiers de recherche 1610, Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques.
    11. Dessy, Sylvain & Diarra, Setou & Pongou, Roland, 2017. "Underage Brides and Grooms' Education," MPRA Paper 77326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Morojele, Neo K. & London, Leslie & Olorunju, Steve A. & Matjila, Maila J. & Davids, Adlai S. & Rendall-Mkosi, Kirstie M., 2010. "Predictors of risk of alcohol-exposed pregnancies among women in an urban and a rural area of South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 534-542, February.
    13. Muhammad Nadeem & Muhammad Irfan Malik & Mumtaz Anwar & Sobia Khurram, 2021. "Women Decision Making Autonomy as a Facilitating Factor for Contraceptive Use for Family Planning in Pakistan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 71-89, July.
    14. José G Dias & Isabel Tiago de Oliveira, 2015. "Multilevel Effects of Wealth on Women's Contraceptive Use in Mozambique," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Luca Zanin & Rosalba Radice & Giampiero Marra, 2015. "Modelling the impact of women’s education on fertility in Malawi," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 89-111, January.
    16. Øystein Kravdal, 2012. "Further evidence of community education effects on fertility in sub-Saharan Africa," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(22), pages 645-680.
    17. Priyanka Dixit & Laxmi Kant Dwivedi & Amrita Gupta, 2017. "Role of Maternal and Child Health Care Services on Postpartum Contraceptive Adoption in India," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    18. Dunn, Richard A. & Tan, Andrew K.G., 2010. "Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: Are targeted interventions necessary?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1089-1093, September.
    19. Markovic, Milica & Kesic, Vesna & Topic, Lidija & Matejic, Bojana, 2005. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study with women in Serbia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2528-2535, December.
    20. Sharad Kumar Sharma & Naresh Pratap & Dhruba Raj Ghimire, 2011. "Ethnic differentials of the impact of Family Planning Program on contraceptive use in Nepal," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(27), pages 837-868.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:10:p:1486-1493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.