IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i11p2260-2271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourses of normality and difference: Responses to diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological cancer of Australian women

Author

Listed:
  • Wray, Natalie
  • Markovic, Milica
  • Manderson, Lenore

Abstract

By comparison to other cancers such as breast and lung cancer, women in Australia are relatively infrequently diagnosed with gynaecological cancers. Apart from cervical cancer, public health information on gynaecological cancer is limited, as are published stories from gynaecological cancer survivors in women's magazines. Our qualitative study investigated how women with gynaecological cancers develop an identity in relation to their illness, and examined the extent of, and reasons for, a sense of perceived difference. The study was conducted between 2001 and 2003 and included in-depth interviews with 52 women aged 27-80 years diagnosed with gynaecological cancer within the past 5 years. Our analysis illustrates how women draw on a wider cancer discourse to make sense of their own illness, which gave them a sense of commonality. However, some women, predominantly those who were diagnosed with cancer of the vulva or vagina, or who underwent particular uncommon or unfamiliar treatments such as brachytherapy, had difficulties situating their illness within the wider cancer discourse. This had implications for women when accessing social support.

Suggested Citation

  • Wray, Natalie & Markovic, Milica & Manderson, Lenore, 2007. "Discourses of normality and difference: Responses to diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological cancer of Australian women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 2260-2271, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:11:p:2260-2271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00083-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Katharine & Jewkes, Rachel & Abrahams, Naeemah, 1997. "Cleaning the womb: Constructions of cervical screening and womb cancer among rural Black women in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 283-294, July.
    2. Boonmongkon, Pimpawun & Nichter, Mark & Pylypa, Jen, 2001. "Mot Luuk problems in northeast Thailand: why women's own health concerns matter as much as disease rates," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 1095-1112, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karianne Oldertrøen Solli & Marjolein de Boer & Kari Nyheim Solbrække & Lisbeth Thoresen, 2019. "Male partners’ experiences of caregiving for women with cervical cancer—a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 987-996, March.
    2. Anne Sidenius & Lenore Manderson & Ole Mogensen & Martin Rudnicki & Lars Mikael Alling Møller & Helle Ploug Hansen, 2019. "“But this is a good cancer:” Patient perceptions of endometrial cancer in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 245-256, January.
    3. Guntram, Lisa, 2013. "“Differently normal” and “normally different”: Negotiations of female embodiment in women's accounts of ‘atypical’ sex development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 232-238.
    4. Willig, Carla, 2011. "Cancer diagnosis as discursive capture: Phenomenological repercussions of being positioned within dominant constructions of cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 897-903, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. White, Heather L. & Mulambia, Chishimba & Sinkala, Moses & Mwanahamuntu, Mulindi H. & Parham, Groesbeck P. & Moneyham, Linda & Grimley, Diane M. & Chamot, Eric, 2012. "‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1486-1493.
    2. Le Thi Ngoc Phuc, 2016. "Understanding of cervical cancer and screening among Vietnamese female sex workers in Ho Chi Minh City," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 6(1), pages 24-32.
    3. Dunn, Richard A. & Tan, Andrew K.G., 2010. "Cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: Are targeted interventions necessary?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1089-1093, September.
    4. Markovic, Milica & Kesic, Vesna & Topic, Lidija & Matejic, Bojana, 2005. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study with women in Serbia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2528-2535, December.
    5. Le Thi Ngoc Phuc, 2016. "Vietnamese female sex workers’ perception of the healthcare quality in cervical cancer screening in Ho Chi Minh city," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 6(1), pages 50-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:11:p:2260-2271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.