IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i8p1155-1158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential patient-caregiver opinions of treatment and care for advanced lung cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Amy Y.
  • Zyzanski, Stephen J.
  • Siminoff, Laura A.

Abstract

This study examined the differences of opinion between cancer patients and caregivers with regard to treatment and care decisions. 184 advanced lung cancer patients and 171 primary caregivers were recruited as a convenience sample from hospitals in Cleveland, Ohio. A telephone interview was conducted to collect data using a semi-structured questionnaire. Nonparametric tests and regression analysis were performed. The findings showed that patients and caregivers reported significant disagreement on three main issues: trade-off between treatment side effects and benefits; reporting treatment side effects to physicians, and hospice care. Caregivers were more concerned about patient's quality of life and more willing to discuss hospice issues than were patients (p

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Amy Y. & Zyzanski, Stephen J. & Siminoff, Laura A., 2010. "Differential patient-caregiver opinions of treatment and care for advanced lung cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1155-1158, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:8:p:1155-1158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00044-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas, Carol, 2005. "The place of death of cancer patients: can qualitative data add to known factors?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 2597-2607, June.
    2. Thomas, Carol & Morris, Sara M. & Harman, Juliet C., 2002. "Companions through cancer: : the care given by informal carers in cancer contexts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 529-544, February.
    3. Rodin, Gary & Lo, Christopher & Mikulincer, Mario & Donner, Allan & Gagliese, Lucia & Zimmermann, Camilla, 2009. "Pathways to distress: The multiple determinants of depression, hopelessness, and the desire for hastened death in metastatic cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 562-569, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine A. Ornstein & Melissa M. Garrido & Albert L. Siu & Evan Bollens-Lund & Omari-Khalid Rahman & Amy S. Kelley, 2019. "An Examination of Downstream Effects of Bereavement on Healthcare Utilization for Surviving Spouses in a National Sample of Older Adults," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 585-596, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leila Abou Salha & Julio Cesar Souza Silva & Cleusa Alves Martins & Cristiane Soares da Costa Araújo & Edinamar Aparecida Santos da Silva & Angela Gilda Alves & Cácia Régia de Paula & Flavio Henrique , 2021. "Caregivers of Individuals with Cancer in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    3. Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Hunter-Jones, Philippa & Al-Abdin, Ahmed & Lewin, Daniel & Spence, Rachel, 2020. "Conceptualizing experiential luxury in palliative care: Pathographies of liminal space, cathedral, and community," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 446-457.
    4. Katherine Ramos & Karena Leo & Laura S. Porter & Joan M. Romano & Brian R. W. Baucom & Shelby L. Langer, 2023. "Attachment in Couples Coping with Cancer: Associations with Observed Communication and Long-Term Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Cohen, Joachim & Bilsen, Johan & Hooft, Peter & Deboosere, Patrick & Wal, Gerrit van der & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "Dying at home or in an institution: Using death certificates to explore the factors associated with place of death," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(2-3), pages 319-329, October.
    6. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.
    7. Thompson, Tess & Coats, Jacquelyn & Croston, Merriah & Motley, Robert O. & Thompson, Vetta Sanders & James, Aimee S. & Johnson, LaShaune P., 2024. "“We need a little strength as well”: Examining the social context of informal caregivers for Black women with breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    8. Daniel JW Jones & Kate Harvey & John P Harris & Laurie T Butler & Emma C Vaux, 2018. "Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 193-204, January.
    9. Leeson, George W., 2019. "The ageing and de-institutionalisation of death—Evidence from England and Wales," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 435-439.
    10. Wilson, Donna M. & Truman, Corrine D. & Thomas, Roger & Fainsinger, Robin & Kovacs-Burns, Kathy & Froggatt, Katherine & Justice, Christopher, 2009. "The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 1994-2004," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1752-1758, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:8:p:1155-1158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.