Author
Listed:
- Katherine Ramos
(Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
Center for the Study of Human Aging and Development, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA)
- Karena Leo
(Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA)
- Laura S. Porter
(Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA)
- Joan M. Romano
(Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)
- Brian R. W. Baucom
(Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)
- Shelby L. Langer
(Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)
Abstract
Cancer poses a threat to well-being that may activate the attachment system and influence interpersonal dynamics, such as communication. Research indicates that avoidant and anxious attachment, as well as communication, are independently associated with poorer psychosocial well-being, yet studies examining links between attachment, communication, and long-term physical well-being are lacking. We examined (a) associations between patient and partner attachment (measured with the adult attachment scale [AAS-Revised]) and observed communication (across affect [the Relational Affective Topography System (RATS) coding system] and behavior [the Asymmetric Behavior Coding System (ABCS) coding system]) and (b) the extent to which attachment and communication independently predicted long-term physical well-being (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Population [FACT-GP]). Participants were 134 couples [mean age 53.9 ( SD = 13.4), 86.2% Caucasian, 66% of patients, 36% of partners female]. Patient participants had either breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Couples individually completed self-report measures of attachment (baseline) and physical well-being (baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months later). At baseline, couples engaged in a 15 min videorecorded cancer-related conversation coded for communication behavior and affective expression. Patients and partners with higher anxious and avoidant attachment exhibited more negative affect and negative approach behaviors. A greater avoidant attachment was associated with less positive affective expression. Attachment insecurity and affective expression were prospectively linked with physical well-being. Findings indicate that attachment is associated with overt communication behaviors and that insecure attachment and affective expression may be risk factors for poorer health outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Katherine Ramos & Karena Leo & Laura S. Porter & Joan M. Romano & Brian R. W. Baucom & Shelby L. Langer, 2023.
"Attachment in Couples Coping with Cancer: Associations with Observed Communication and Long-Term Health,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5249-:d:1105913
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Rodin, Gary & Lo, Christopher & Mikulincer, Mario & Donner, Allan & Gagliese, Lucia & Zimmermann, Camilla, 2009.
"Pathways to distress: The multiple determinants of depression, hopelessness, and the desire for hastened death in metastatic cancer patients,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 562-569, February.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5249-:d:1105913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.